This article documents the development of synthetic jet actuator array hardware to augment high-lift system effectiveness in a wind tunnel model. The study involved the design, manufacture and bench test of a synthetic jet actuator array based on an inclined actuator configuration to reduce volume installation requirements without a loss in jet velocity relative to a non-inclined baseline model; incorporation of proper synthetic jet actuator systems wiring and internal synthetic jet actuator chamber pressure-sensing for actuator health monitoring. The peak velocity obtained from the inclined synthetic jet actuator array was 100 m/s, which favourably compares to the baseline array (∼90 m/s), while reducing the usable depth requirements by 50%. The final outcome of this study has been to apply the design lessons learned to develop a methodology for designing a synthetic jet actuator array with the constraints of using piezoelectric-based actuator technology for flow separation control applications.
BushnellDM. Aircraft drag reduction – a review. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2003; 217: 1–18.
2.
Meunier M and Brunet V. High-lift device performance enhancement using flow control strategies. In: Proceedings of the 7th ONERA-DLR Aerospace symposium, Toulouse, France, 4–6 October 2006, pp. 1–15.
3.
JoslinRDThomasRHChoudhariMM. Synergism of flow and noise control technologies. Prog Aerosp Sci2005; 41: 363–417.
4.
Bushnell DM. Application frontiers of ‘designer fluid mechanics’ – visions versus reality or an attempt to answer the perennial question ‘why isn’t it used?’. AIAA paper 97-2110, June 1997.
Aider JL, Harambat F, Lasserre JJ, et al. Characterization of MEMS pulsed micro-jets with large nozzles. In: Proceedings of IUTAM Symposium on flow control and MEMS (Eds Morrison JF, Birch DM and Lavoie P), London, England, 19–22 September 2006. Berlin: Springer, pp.53–58.
7.
FrutosJRVernierDBastienF. An electrostatically actuated valve for turbulent boundary layer control. IEEE Sens2005; 7: 82–88.
DuclouxOViardRTalbiA. A magnetically actuated, high momentum rate MEMS pulsed microjet for active flow control. J. Micromech Microeng2009; 19: 115031–115031.
10.
Coe DJ, Allen MG, Smith BL, et al. Addressable micromachined jet arrays. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Solid-state sensors and actuators, and eurosensors IX, Transducers 95, Stockholm, Sweden, 25–29 June 1995, pp.329–332.
11.
MallinsonSGKwokCYReizesJA. Numerical simulation of micro-fabricated zero mass-flux jet actuators. Sens Actuators, A2003; 105: 229–236.
12.
Pimpin A, Suzuki Y and Kasagi N. Micro electrorestrictive actuator with metal compliant electrodes for flow control applications. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Micro electro mechanical systems, Maastricht, 25–29 January 2004. pp.478–481.
13.
GimenoLTalbiAViardR. Synthetic jets based on micro magneto mechanical systems for aerodynamic flow control. J Micromech Microeng2010; 20: 075004–075004.
14.
LiddleSCJabbalMCrowtherWJ. Systems and certification issues for civil transport aircraft flow control systems. Aeronaut J2009; 113(1147): 575–586.
15.
CollisSSJoslinRDSeifertA. Issues in active flow control: theory, control, simulation and experiment. Prog Aerosp Sci2004; 40: 237–289.
16.
KesslerSSMarkSS. Design of a piezoelectric-based structural health monitoring system for damage detection in composite materials. Proc SPIE – Smart Struct Mater2002; 4701(86): 86–96.
17.
ParkGInmanDJ. Structural health monitoring using piezoelectric impedance measurements. Philos Trans R Soc2007; 365: 473–392.
18.
ZhaoXQianTMeiG. Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with an embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: II. Wireless approaches. Smart Mater Struct2007; 16: 1218–1225.
19.
Nokhimovitch M, Benima R, Aharonov H, et al. Closed-loop control of a ball position on a beam using piezoelectric fluidic jets. In: Proceedings of the 42nd ISR Aero Meeting, 2002.
20.
JabbalMLiddleSCCrowtherWJ. Active flow control systems architectures for civil transport aircraft. J Aircr2010; 47(6): 1966–1981.
21.
ThompsonHA. Wireless and internet communications technologies for monitoring and control. Control Eng Pract2004; 12: 781–791.
22.
BürKOmiyiPYangY. Wireless sensor and actuator networks: enabling the nervous system of the active aircraft. IEEE Commun Mag2010; 48(7): 118–125.
23.
GlezerAAmitayM. Synthetic jets. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2002; 34: 503–529.
24.
CattafestaLN IIISheplakM. Actuators for active flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2011; 43: 247–272.
25.
ShusterJMSmithDR. Experimental study of the formation and scaling of a round synthetic jet. Phys Fluids A2007; 19: 045109-1–045109-27.
26.
SlipherGAHubbard JnrJE. Description and characterisation of an electroactive polymer synthetic jet actuator. Proc SPIE – Electroact Polym Actuators Devices2007; 6524: 1–12.
27.
LeeSKimKJParkHC. Modelling of an IPMC actuator-driven zero-net-mass-flux pump for flow control. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2006; 17: 533–541.
28.
LiangYKugaYTayaM. Design of membrane actuator based on ferromagnetic shape memory alloy composite for synthetic jet applications. Sens Actuators A2006; 125: 512–518.
29.
ManePMossiKBryantR. Experimental design and analysis for piezoelectric circular actuators in flow control applications. Smart Mater Struct2008; 17: 1–12.
30.
Gomes LT, Crowther WJ and Wood NJ. Towards a practical piezoelectric diaphragm based synthetic jet actuator for high subsonic applications. AIAA paper 06-2859, June 2006.
31.
CrowtherWJGomesLT. An evaluation of the mass and power scaling of synthetic jet actuator flow control technology for civil transport aircraft applications. Proc IMechE, Part I: J Systems and Control Engineering2008; 222(5): 357–372.
32.
Liddle SC. The use of synthetic jet actuators to enhance deflected surface controls. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, UK, 2007.
33.
GodardGStanislasM. Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: optimisation of passive vortex generators. Aeros Sci Technol2006; 10(3): 181–191.
34.
GodardGStanislasM. Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 3: optimisation of round jets vortex generators. Aerosp Sci Technol2006; 10(6): 455–464.
35.
CrowtherWJ. Control of separation on a trailing edge flap using air jet vortex generators. J Aircr2006; 43(5): 1589–1593.
36.
RusoviciRLesieutreGA. Design of a single-crystal piezoceramic-driven synthetic-jet actuator. Proc SPIE – Smart Struct Mater2004; 5390: 276–283.
37.
GallasQHolmanRNishidaT. Lumped element modelling of piezoelectric-driven synthetic jet actuators. AIAA J2003; 41(2): 240–247.
38.
BlevinsRD. Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape, 2nd edn. New York: Von Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1979, p.429–429.
39.
Gomes LD. On the modelling of anisotropic piezoelectric diaphragms for the development of high subsonic synthetic jet actuators. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, UK, 2010.
40.
TangHZhongSJabbalM. Towards the design of synthetic-jet actuators for full-scale flight conditions. Part 2: low-dimensional performance prediction models and actuator design method. Flow Turbul Combust2007; 78: 309–329.
Garcillan L, Liddle S, Sunneechurra K, et al. PIV measurements of the effect of pitch and skew on a circular orifice synthetic jet in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA paper 06-0318, January 2006.
43.
JabbalMZhongS. The near wall effect of synthetic jets in a boundary layer. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2008; 29: 119–130.
44.
JabbalMZhongS. Particle image velocimetry measurements of the interaction of synthetic jets and a zero pressure gradient laminar boundary layer. Phys Fluids A2010; 22(6): 063603–1–063603-17.
