This work proposes a finite-horizon servo state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE) to control two classes of aerospace systems. The SDRE is widely used for nonlinear and optimal control of different systems in theory and practice. In this work, an augmented integrator was added to the SDRE (servo SDRE) to increase performance of the controller, especially to decrease steady-state error. The finite-horizon structure developed for servo SDRE features the advantages of both methods. Attitude control of super-maneuverable aircraft was modeled and simulated. It was then compared with a conventional SDRE controller to show the advantages of the proposed combination. A magnetically suspended double-gimbal control moment gyroscope was tested using the finite-horizon servo SDRE because the control moment gyroscope is the primary attitude control actuator for spacecraft. The results showed that the servo structure improved the performance and decreased the error of the SDRE using a simple systematic approach. The finite-horizon option completes the task sooner than common controllers.
FangJCZhengSQHanBC. AMB vibration control for structural resonance of double-gimbal control moment gyro with high-speed magnetically suspended rotor. IEEE/ASME Trans Mech2013; 18: 32–43.
2.
HuXKarimiHRWuL. Model predictive control-based nonlinear fault tolerant control for air-breathing hypersonic vehicles. IET Control Theory Appl2014; 8: 1147–1153.
3.
ShaoXWangH. Active disturbance rejection based trajectory linearization control for hypersonic reentry vehicle with bounded uncertainties. ISA Trans2014. (Article in Press).
4.
Zhang J, Sun C, Zhang R, et al. Adaptive backstepping controller design for reentry attitude of near space hypersonic vehicle. Intelligence Science and Big Data Engineering, LNCS, 8261, 2013, pp.642–648.
5.
Zhang R, Sun C, Zhang J, et al. Robust continuous terminal sliding mode control design for a near-space hypersonic vehicle. Intelligence Science and Big Data Engineering, LNCS, 8261, 2013, pp.691–696.
6.
XieD-CWangZ-WZhangW-H. Attitude controller for reentry vehicles using state-dependent Riccati equation method. J Central South Univ2013; 20: 1861–1867.
7.
Lam Q and Oppenheimer M. Investigation of adaptive SDRE control reconfiguration subject to control surface failures. In: AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2010, 20–22 April 2010, Atlanta, Georgia.
8.
GengJShengYLiuX. Finite-time sliding mode attitude control for a reentry vehicle with blended aerodynamic surfaces and a reaction control system. Chin J Aeronaut2014; 27: 964–976.
9.
HeydariABalakrishnanSN. Path planning using a novel finite-horizon suboptimal controller. J Guid Control Dyn2013; 36: 1210–1214.
10.
WangFZongQTianB. Adaptive backstepping finite time attitude control of reentry RLV with input constraint. J Math Prob Eng2014. Article ID 801747, 19 pages.
11.
LuKXiaY. Finite-time fault-tolerant control for rigid spacecraft with actuator saturations. IET Control Theory Appl2013; 7: 1529–1539.
12.
WangXWangJ. Partial integrated missile guidance and control with finite time convergence. J Guid Control Dyn2013; 36: 1399–1409.
13.
Cloutier JR and Stansberyt DT. Nonlinear, hybrid bank-to-turn/skid-to-turn missile autopilot design. In: AIAA Guidance, navigation, and control conference, Montreal, Canada, August 2001.
14.
NekooSR. Nonlinear closed loop optimal control: A modified state-dependent Riccati equation. ISA Trans2013; 52: 285–290.
15.
Rafee NekooSGeranmehrB. Control of non-affine systems using the state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE). Majlesi J Mechatron Syst2013; 2: 1–5.
16.
Beeler S. State-dependent Riccati equation regulation of systems with state and control nonlinearities. Technical report, NASA/CR-2004-213245, 2004.
17.
Rafee NekooSGeranmehrB. Nonlinear observer-based optimal control using the state-dependent Riccati equation for a class of non-affine control systems. J Control Eng Appl Inform2014; 16: 5–13.
18.
GeranmehrBRafee NekooS. Nonlinear suboptimal control of fully coupled non-affine six-DOF autonomous underwater vehicle using the state-dependent Riccati equation. J Ocean Eng2015; 96: 248–257.
19.
BeelerSCTranHTBanksHT. Feedback control methodologies for nonlinear systems. J Optim Theory Appl2000; 107: 1–33.
20.
ÇimenTBanksSP. Global optimal feedback control for general nonlinear systems with non quadratic performance criteria. Syst Control Lett2004; 53: 327–346.
21.
ÇimenTBanksSP. Nonlinear optimal tracking control with application to super-tankers for autopilot design. Automatica2004; 40: 1845–1863.
22.
Heydari A and Balakrishnan SN. Approximate closed-form solutions to finite horizon optimal control of nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, article no. 6315505, June 2012, pp.2657–2662.
23.
BaigzadehBNazarzehiVKhaloozadehH. Simulation of the performance of novel nonlinear optimal control technique on two cart-inverted pendulum systems. World Acad Sci Eng Technol2010; 70: 524–528.
24.
AbdelrahmanMChangIParkSY. Magnetic torque attitude control of a satellite using the state-dependent Riccati equation technique. Int J Nonlinear Mech2011; 46: 758–771.
25.
KorayemMHNekooSR. Finite-time state-dependent Riccati equation for time-varying non-affine systems: Rigid and flexible joint manipulator control. ISA Trans2015; 57: 125–144.
26.
KorayemMHNekooSR. State-dependent differential Riccati equation to track control of time-varying systems with state and control nonlinearities. ISA Trans2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.02.008.
27.
JungJParkSYKimSW. Hardware-in-the-loop simulations of spacecraft attitude synchronization using the state-dependent Riccati equation technique. Adv Space Res2013; 51: 434–449.
28.
Alizadeh S, Adhami A and Yazdanpanah MJ. Optimal control of drug administration in cancer treatment via state-dependent Riccati equation (SDRE) method. In: Proceedings of the 20th Iranian conference on electric engineering, Tehran, Iran, May 2012.
29.
KirkDE. Optimal control theory, Mineola, New York: Dover Publications Inc., 1970.
30.
NazarzadehJRazzaghiMNikraveshKY. Solution of the matrix Riccati equation for the linear quadratic control problems. Math Comput Model1998; 27: 51–55.
31.
NguyenTGajicZ. Solving the matrix differential Riccati equation: A Lyapunov equation approach. IEEE Trans Autom Control2010; 55: 191–194.
32.
Cloutier JR and Stansbery DT. The capabilities and art of State-dependent Riccati equation-based design. In: Proceedings of the American control conference, vol. 1, 2002, pp.86–91.
33.
StengelRF. Flight dynamics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
34.
MeriamJLKraigeLG. Engineering mechanics: Dynamics, 7th ed. SI Version. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012.
35.
SnellSAEnnsDFGarrardWL. Nonlinear inversion flight control for a super manoeuvrable aircraft. J Guid Control Dyn1992; 15: 976–984.
36.
Wang L, Sheng Y, Liu X, et al. SDRE based optimal time-varying sliding mode control for re-entry vehicle. In: The 25th Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC), Guiyang, China, 25–27 May 2013.
37.
WeiTFangJ. Moving-gimbal effect and angular rate feed forward control in magnetically suspended rotor system of CMG. J Astronaut Sci2005; 26: 19–23.
38.
PengCFangJ. High-precision control for double-gimbal magnetically suspended control moment gyro via composite anti-disturbance control. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2014.
39.
FangJRenY. Decoupling control of magnetically suspended rotor system in control moment gyros based on an inverse system method. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2012; 17: 1133–1144.
40.
XiaocenCMaoyinC. Precise control of a magnetically suspended double-gimbal control moment gyroscope using differential geometry decoupling method. Chin J Aeronaut2013; 26: 1017–1028.
