Development and validation of a hybrid method for predicting helicopter rotor impulsive noise

Abstract

Prediction of helicopter rotor impulsive noise is practically a very challenging task. This paper describes a hybrid method to predict rotor impulsive noise for both high-speed impulsive noise and blade–vortex interaction noise. The hybrid solver has been developed by combining the advantages of three different methods: (1) a computational fluid dynamics method based on Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations to account for the viscous and compressible effects near the blade; (2) a vorticity transport model to predict rotor wake system without artificial dissipation; and (3) an acoustic calculation method, based on Ffowcs-Williams Hawkings equation implemented to a permeable data surface. The developed hybrid solver is validated through available test data, for the cases of UH-1H model rotor, AH-1 Operational Loads Survey rotor, and Helishape 7A rotor. Peak sound pressure level of high-speed impulsive noise is accurately predicted with relative errors less than 7%. Additionally, acoustic waveform of blade–vortex interaction noise is well captured though it is sensitive to small changes in aerodynamic load. It is suggested that present hybrid method is versatile for the prediction of rotor impulsive noise with moderate computational cost.

Keywords

Helicopter rotor aeroacoustics impulsive noise hybrid method permeable data surface

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Strawn

Biswas

Garceau

. Unstructured adaptive mesh computations of rotorcraft high-speed impulsive noise. J Aircr 1995; 32: 754–760.

Datta

Sitaraman

Chopra

et al.

CFD/CSD prediction of rotor vibratory loads in high-speed flight. J Aircr 2006; 43: 1698–1709.

Antoniadis

Drikakis

Zhong

et al.

Assessment of CFD methods against experimental flow measurements for helicopter flows. Aerosp Sci Technol 2012; 19: 86–100.

Pahlke

Wall

. Chimera simulations of multibladed rotors in high-speed forward flight with weak fluid-structure-coupling. Aerosp Sci Technol 2005; 9: 379–389.

Pomin

Wagner

. Navier–Stokes analysis of helicopter rotor aerodynamics in hover and forward flight. J Aircr 2002; 39: 813–821.

Jarkowski

Woodgate

Barakos

et al.

Towards consistent hybrid overset mesh methods for rotorcraft CFD. Int J Numer Meth Fluid 2014; 74: 543–576.

Drikakis

Hahn

Mosedale

et al.

Large eddy simulation using high resolution and high order methods. Philos T Roy Soc A 2009; 367: 2985–2997.

Thornber

Drikakis

. Implicit large eddy simulation of a deep cavity using high-resolution methods. AIAA J 2008; 46: 2634–2685.

Tsoutsanis

Kokkinakis

Könözsy

et al.

Comparison of structured- and unstructured-grid, compressible and incompressible methods using the vortex pairing problem. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 2015; 293: 207–231.

10.

Miller

Bliss

. Direct periodic solutions of rotor free wake calculations. J Am Helicopter Soc 1993; 38: 53–60.

11.

Wall BG. Helicopter rotor BVI airloads computation using advanced prescribed wake modeling. In: Twenty-ninth AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Honolulu, USA, 27–30 June 2011, pp. 1–21. Reston, VA, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

12.

Biava M, Bindolino G and Vigevano L. Single blade computations of helicopter rotors in forward flight. In: Proceedings of the 41st aerospace sciences meeting & exhibit, Reno, USA, 6–9 January 2003, pp. 1–10. Reston, VA, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

13.

Wie

Dong

Kwon

et al.

Numerical simulation of rotor using coupled computational fluid dynamics and free wake. J Aircr 2010; 47: 1167–1177.

14.

Sugiura

Tanabe

Sugawara

. Development of a hybrid method of CFD and prescribed wake model for helicopter BVI noise prediction. Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 2013; 27: 343–350.

15.

Algermissen G and Wagner S. Computation of helicopter BVI noise by coupling free-wake, Euler and Kirchhoff method. In: Fourth AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Toulouse, France, 2–4 June 1998, pp. 217–225. Reston, VA, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

16.

Cao

et al.

Combined free wake/CFD methodology for predicting transonic rotor flow in hover. Chin J Aeronaut 2002; 15: 65–71.

17.

Fletcher

Brown

. Helicopter tail rotor thrust and main rotor wake coupling in crosswind flight. J Aircr 2010; 47: 2136–2148.

18.

Zhao

. Modeling rotor wake dynamics with viscous vortex particle method. AIAA J 2012; 47: 902–915.

19.

Shi

Wei

. Rotor wake and flow analysis using a coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian method. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 2016; 10: 384–402.

20.

Williams

JEF

Hawkings

. Sound generated by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos Trans R Soc A 1969; 264: 321–342.

21.

Morgans

Karabasov

Dowling

et al.

Transonic helicopter noise. AIAA J 2012; 43: 1512–1524.

22.

Farassat

. Linear acoustic formulas for calculation of rotating blade noise. AIAA J 1981; 19: 1122–1130.

23.

Brentner KS. Prediction of helicopter discrete frequency rotor noise – a computer program incorporating realistic blade motions and advanced formulation. In: NASA TM-87721, Hampton, USA, October 1986, pp. 1–90. Washington, DC, USA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

24.

Strawn

Biswas

Lyrintzis

et al.

Helicopter noise predictions using Kirchhoff methods. J Comput. Acoust 2011; 4: 321–339.

25.

Brentner

. An efficient and robust method for predicting helicopter rotor high-speed impulsive noise. J Sound Vib 1997; 203: 87–100.

26.

Francescantonio

. A new boundary integral formulation for the prediction of sound radiation. J Sound Vib 1997; 202: 491–509.

27.

Brentner

Farassat

. Analytical comparison of the acoustic analogy and Kirchhoff formulation for moving surfaces. AIAA J 1998; 36: 1379–1386.

28.

Koushik S and Schmitz FH. Understanding in-plane helicopter Blade-Vortex Interaction (BVI) noise. In: American helicopter society 68th annual forum, Fort Worth, USA, 1–3 May 2012, pp. 1–12. Fairfax, VA, USA: American Helicopter Society.

29.

Ikeda T, Enomoto S, Yamamoto K, et al. Quadrupole effects in the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings equation using permeable control surface. In: Eighteenth AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Colorado Springs, USA, 4–6 June 2012, pp. 1–13. Reston, VA, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

30.

Shi

Zhao

. An analytical study of parametric effects on rotor–vortex interaction noise. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering 2011; 225: 259–268.

31.

Roe

. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J Comput Phys 1981; 43: 357–372.

32.

Leschziner

Drikakis

. Turbulence and turbulent-flow computation in aeronautics. Aeronaut J 2002; 106: 349–384.

33.

Spalart PR and Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: Thirtieth aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, USA, 6–9 January 1992, pp. 1–22. Reston, VA, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

34.

Jameson

Yoon

. Lower-upper implicit schemes with multiple grids for the Euler equations. AIAA J 1987; 25: 929–935.

35.

Brown

Line

. Efficient high-resolution wake modeling using the vorticity transport equation. AIAA J 2005; 43: 1434–1443.

36.

Zhao JG and He CJ. Enhancements of viscous vortex particle method for fundamental rotor wake dynamics simulation. In: Fiftieth AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Nashville, USA, 9–12 January 2012.

37.

Ying

Biros

Zorin

. A kernel-independent adaptive fast multipole algorithm in two and three dimensions. J Comput Phys 2004; 196: 591–626.

38.

Eldredge

Leonard

Colonius

. A general deterministic treatment of derivatives in particle methods. J Comput Phys 2002; 180: 686–709.

39.

Lighthill

. On sound generated aerodynamically. I: general theory. Proc Roy Soc A 1952; 211: 564–587.

40.

Quaranta

Drikakis

. Noise radiation from a ducted rotor in a swirling-translating flow. J Fluid Mech 2009; 641: 463–473.

41.

Hanson

Fink

. The importance of quadrupole sources in prediction of transonic tip speed propeller noise. J Sound Vib 1979; 62: 19–38.

42.

Boxwell

Schmitz

. Hovering impulsive noise – some measured and calculated results. Vertica 1978; 3: 35–45.

43.

Boxwell DA, Schmitz FH, Splettstoesser WR, et al. Model helicopter rotor high-speed impulsive noise: measured acoustics and blade pressures. In: NASA TM-85850, St Louis, USA, September 1983, pp. 1–33. Washington, DC, USA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

44.

Boxwell

Schmitz

Splettstoesser

et al.

Helicopter model rotor-blade vortex interaction impulsive noise: scalability and parametric variations. J Am Helicopter Soc 1987; 32: 3–12.

45.

Splettstoesser

Junker

Wagner

et al.

A parametric wind tunnel test on rotorcraft aerodynamics and aeroacoustics (Helishape) – test procedures and representative results. Aeronaut J 1997; 101: 143–154.