Analytic and computational analysis of wing twist to minimize induced drag during roll

Abstract

Geometric and/or aerodynamic wing twist can be used to produce a lift distribution that results in a rolling moment. A decomposed Fourier-series solution to Prandtl’s lifting-line theory is used to develop analytic spanwise antisymmetric twist distributions for roll control that minimize induced drag on wings of arbitrary planform in pure rolling motion. Roll initiation, steady rolling rate, and the transition between the two are each considered. It is shown that if these antisymmetric twist distributions are used, the induced drag is proportional to the square of the rolling moment, and the induced drag during a steady rolling rate is equal to that on the wing at the same lift coefficient with no rolling rate or antisymmetric twist distribution. Results also show that if these antisymmetric twist distributions are used on straight, tapered wings without symmetric twist, any rolling maneuver for which the rolling rate and rolling moment have the same sign will always produce a yawing moment in the opposite direction. Computational results are also included, which were obtained using a gradient-based optimization algorithm in combination with a modern numerical lifting-line algorithm to find the optimum twist solutions. The resulting twist, induced drag, and yawing moment solutions compare favorably with the analytic solutions developed in the text. The solutions presented here can be used to inform the design of morphing aircraft.

Keywords

Analytical aerodynamics roll control morphing aircraft lifting-line theory minimum induced drag

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Glines

. The promise of flight fulfilled. Aviat Hist 2003; 14: 26–26.

Lougheed

. The secret experiments of the Wright Brothers. Pop Mech 1911, pp. 797–804.

Joo J, Marks C, Zientarski L, et al. Variable camber compliant wing – design. In: 23rd AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, Kissimmee, FL, 5–9 January 2015, paper no. AIAA-2015-1050.

Marks CR, Zientarski L, Culler AJ, et al. Variable camber compliant wing – wind tunnel testing. In: 23rd AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, Kissimmee, FL, 5–9 January 2015, paper no. AIAA-2015-1051.

Miller SC, Rumpfkeil MP and Joo JJ. Fluid-structure interaction of a variable camber compliant wing. In: 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, FL, 5–9 January 2015, paper no. AIAA-2015-1235.

Joo JJ, Marks CR and Zientarski L. Active wing shape reconfiguration using a variable camber compliant wing system. In: 20th International Conference on Composite Materials, Copenhagen, Denmark, 19–24 July 2015.

Marks CR, Zientarski L and Joo JJ. Investigation into the effect of shape deviation on variable camber compliant wing performance. In: 24th AIAA/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, San Diego, CA, 4–8 January 2016, paper no. AIAA-2016-1313.

Kudva J, Appa K, Martin C, et al. Design, fabrication, and testing of the DARPA/Wright Lab smart wing wind tunnel model. In: 38th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, FL, 7–10 April 1997, paper no. AIAA-1997-1198.

Gilbert WW. Development of a mission adaptive wing system for a tactical aircraft. In: Aircraft Systems Meeting, Aircraft Design and Technology Meeting, Anaheim, CA, 4–6 August 1980.

10.

Hall JM. Executive summary AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing. Technical Report, WRDC-TR-89-2083, Wright Research Development Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, September 1989.

11.

Hetrick J, Osborn R, Kota S, et al. Flight testing of mission adaptive compliant wing. In: 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu, HI, 23–26 April 2007, paper no. AIAA-2007-1709.

12.

Vos

Gurdal

Abdalla

. Mechanism for warp-controlled twist of a morphing wing. J Aircr 2010; 47: 450–457.

13.

Dale AS, Cooper JE and Mosquera A. Adaptive camber-morphing wing using 0-υ honeycomb. In: 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Boston, MA, 8–11 April 2013, paper no. AIAA-2013-1510.

14.

Khot

Appa

Eastep

. Optimization of flexible wing without ailerons for rolling maneuver. J Aircr 2000; 37: 892–897.

15.

Stanford

Abdulrahim

Lind

, et al. Investigation of membrane actuation for roll control of a micro air vehicle. J Aircr 2007; 44: 741–749.

16.

Pecora

Amoroso

Lecce

. Effectiveness of wing twist morphing in roll control. J Aircr 2012; 49: 1666–1674.

17.

Fage A. On the theory of tapered aerofoils. Aeronautical Research Council, Reports and Memoranda 806, 1923.

18.

Munk MM. On the distribution of lift along the span of an airfoil with displaced ailerons. NACA TN-195, 1924.

19.

Munk MM. A new relation between the induced yawing moment and the rolling moment of an airfoil in straight motion. NACA TR-197, June 1925.

20.

Scarborough JB. Some problems on the lift and rolling moment of airplane wings. NACA TR-200, 1925.

21.

Glauert H. Theoretical relationships for an airfoil with hinged flap. Aeronautical Research Council, Reports and Memoranda 1095, 1927.

22.

Wieselsberger C and Asano T. Determination of the air forces and moments produced by the ailerons of an airplane. NACA TM-488, 1928.

23.

Gates SB. An analysis of a rectangular monoplane with hinged tips. Aeronautical Research Council, Reports and Memoranda 1175, 1928.

24.

Hartshorn AS. Theoretical relationship for a wing with unbalanced ailerons. Aeronautical Research Council, Reports and Memoranda 1259, 1929.

25.

Lotz

. Berechnung der Auftriebsverteilung beliebig geformter Flugel. Zeitscrhift fur Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt 1931; 22: 189–195.

26.

Jacobs EN and Sherman A. Wing characteristics as affected by protuberances of short span. NACA TR-449, 1933.

27.

Lippisch A. Method for the determination of the spanwise lift distribution. NACA TM-778, 1935.

28.

Pearson HA. Span load distribution for tapered wings with partial-span flaps. NACA TR-585, 1937.

29.

Pearson HA. Theoretical span loading and moments of tapered wings produced by aileron deflection. NACA TN-589, 1937.

30.

Pearson HA and Jones RT. Theoretical stability and control characteristics of wings with various amounts of taper and twist. NACA TR-635, 1937.

31.

Prandtl L. Tragflügel theorie. In: Nachricten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen, Ges-chäeftliche Mitteilungen, Klasse, 1918, pp.451–477.

32.

Prandtl L. Applications of modern hydrodynamics to aeronautics. NACA TR-116, June 1921.

33.

Vernengo

Bonfiglio

Brizzolara

. Supercavitating three-dimensional hydrofoil analysis by viscous lifting-line approach. AIAA J 2017; 55: 4127–4141.

34.

Gamble

Pankonien

Inman

. Stall recovery of a morphing wing via extended nonlinear lifting-line theory. AIAA J 2017; 55: 2956–2963.

35.

Izraelevitz

Zhu

Triantafyllou

. State-space adaptation of unsteady lifting line theory: twisting/flapping wings of finite span. AIAA J 2017; 55: 1279–1294.

36.

Gallay

Laurendeau

. Preliminary-design aerodynamic model for complex configurations using lifting-line coupling algorithm. J Aircr 2016; 53: 1145–1159.

37.

Gallay

Laurendeau

. Nonlinear generalized lifting-line coupling algorithms for pre/poststall flows. AIAA J 2015; 53: 1784–1792.

38.

Spalart

. Prediction of lift cells for stalling wings by lifting-line theory. AIAA J 2014; 52: 1817–1821.

39.

Phillips

. Analytical decomposition of wing roll and flapping using lifting-line theory. J Aircr 2014; 51: 761–778.

40.

Phillips

Hunsaker

. Lifting-line predictions for induced drag and lift in ground effect. J Aircr 2013; 50: 1226–1233.

41.

Wickenheiser

Garcia

. Extended nonlinear lifting-line method for aerodynamic modeling of reconfigurable aircraft. J Aircr 2011; 48: 1812–1817.

42.

Phillips WF. Incompressible flow over finite wings. In: Kermode A (ed.) Mechanics of flight. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2010, pp.46–94.

43.

Junge

Gerhardt

Richards

, et al. Optimizing spanwise lift distributions yacht sails using extended lifting line analysis. J Aircr 2010; 47: 2119–2129.

44.

Alley

Phillips

Spall

. Predicting maximum lift coefficient for twisted wings using computational fluid dynamics. J Aircr 2007; 44: 911–917.

45.

Phillips

Alley

. Predicting maximum lift coefficient for twisted wings using lifting-line theory. J Aircr 2007; 44: 898–910.

46.

Wickenheiser

Garcia

. Aerodynamic modeling of morphing wings using an extended lifting-line analysis. J Aircr 2007; 44: 10–16.

47.

Phillips

Fugal

Spall

. Minimizing induced drag with wing twist, computational-fluid-dynamics validation. J Aircr 2006; 43: 437–444.

48.

Phillips

. New twist on an old wing theory. Aerosp Am 2005; 43: 27–30.

49.

Phillips

Alley

Goodrich

. Lifting-line analysis of roll control and variable twist. J Aircr 2004; 41: 1169–1176.

50.

Phillips

. Lifting-line analysis for twisted wings and washout-optimized wings. J Aircr 2004; 41: 128–136.

51.

Sugimoto

. Induced velocity in the plane of an elliptically loaded lifting line. AIAA J 2002; 40: 1233–1236.

52.

Phillips

Snyder

. Modern adaptation of Prandtl’s classic lifting-line theory. J Aircr 2000; 37: 662–670.

53.

Rasmussen

Smith

. Lifting-line theory for arbitrarily shaped wings. J Aircr 1999; 36: 340–348.

54.

Iosilevskii

. Lifting-line theory of an arched wing in asymmetric flight. J Aircr 1996; 33: 1023–1026.

55.

Jadic

Constantinescu

. Lifting line theory for supersonic flow applications. AIAA J 1993; 31: 987–994.

56.

Plotkin

Tan

. Lifting-line solution for a symmetrical thin wing in ground effect. AIAA J 1986; 24: 1193–1194.

57.

Cheng

Meng

Chow

, et al. Transonic swept wings studied by the lifting-line theory. AIAA J 1981; 19: 961–968.

58.

Anderson

Corda

. Numerical lifting line theory applied to drooped leading-edge wings below and above stall. J Aircr 1980; 17: 898–904.

59.

Cheng

Meng

. Lifting-line theory of oblique wings in transonic flows. AIAA J 1979; 17: 121–124.

60.

Cheng

. Lifting-line theory of oblique wings. AIAA J 1978; 16: 1211–1213.

61.

Small

. Transonic lifting line theory – numerical procedure for shock-free flows. AIAA J 1978; 16: 632–634.

62.

Lan

Fasce

. Applications of an improved nonlinear lifting-line theory. J Aircr 1977; 14: 404–407.

63.

Bera

. Comment on solution of the lifting line equation for twisted elliptic wings. J Aircr 1975; 12: 561–562.

64.

Bera

. Some remarks on the solution of the lifting line equation. J Aircr 1974; 11: 647–648.

65.

Lan

. An improved nonlinear lifting-line theory. AIAA J 1973; 11: 739–742.

66.

Kerney

. A correction to lifting-line theory as a singular perturbation problem. AIAA J 1972; 10: 1683–1684.

67.

Filotas

. Solution of the lifting line equation for twisted elliptic wings. J Aircr 1971; 8: 835–836.

68.

Lakshminarayana

. Extension of lifting-line theory to a cascade of split aerofoils. AIAA J 1964; 2: 938–940.

69.

Anderson

Millsaps

. Application of the Galerkin method to the Prandtl lifting line equation. J Aircr 1964; 1: 126–128.

70.

Tuyl

. The replacement of lifting surfaces by lifting lines with variable position. J Aerosp Sci 1959; 26: 127–128.

71.

Dengler

. Concerning the subsonic calculation of circulatory spanwise loadings for oscillating airfoils by lifting-line techniques. J Aeronaut Sci 1953; 20: 439–439.

72.

Dengler

. The subsonic calculation of circulatory spanwise loadings for oscillating airfoils by lifting-line techniques. J Aeronaut Sci 1952; 19: 751–759.

73.

Reissner

. Note on the relation of lifting-line theory to lifting-surface theory. J Aeronaut Sci 1951; 18: 212–214.

74.

Flax

. On a variational principle in lifting-line theory. J Aeronaut Sci 1950; 17: 596–597.

75.

Nickel

KLE

. Lösung eines Minimumproblems der Tragflügeltheorie. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 1951; 31: 72–77.

76.

Nickel KLE. Minimum drag for wings with prescribed lift, roll moment and yaw moment. University of Wisconsin MRC Technical Summary Report 2573, September 1983.

77.

Kutta

. Auftriebskräfte in Strömenden Flüssigkeiten. Illustrierte Aeronautische Mitteilungen 1902; 6: 133–135.

78.

Joukowski

. Sur les Tourbillons Adjionts. Traraux de la Section Physique de la Societé Imperiale des Amis des Sciences Naturales 1906; 13: 261–284.

79.

Hunsaker DF, Montgomery ZS and Joo JJ. Lifting-line analysis of wing twist to minimize induced drag during pure rolling motion. In: AIAA SciTech Forum, San Diego, California, 7–11 January 2019, paper no. AIAA-2019-2040.

80.

Feifel

. Combination of aileron and flap deflection for minimum induced drag roll control. Tech Soar 1980; 5: 15–23.

81.

Katz J and Plotkin A. Lifting-line solution by horseshoe elements. Low-speed aerodynamics. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp.331–338.

82.

Saffman

. Vortex dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

83.

Hodson J, Hunsaker DF and Spall R. Wing optimization using dual number automatic differentiation in MachUp. In: 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA SciTech Forum, Grapevine, Texas, 9–13 January 2017, paper no. AIAA-2017-0033.

84.

Kraft D. A software package for sequential quadratic programming. Technical Report, DFVLR-FB 88-28, DLR German Aerospace Center – Institute for Flight Mechanics, Koln, Germany, 1988.

85.

Montgomery ZS, Hunsaker DF and Joo JJ. A methodology for roll control of morphing aircraft. In: AIAA SciTech Forum, San Diego, California, 7–11 January 2019, paper no. AIAA-2019-2041.