Evaluation of postural steadiness in below-knee amputees when wearing different prosthetic feet during various sensory conditions using the Biodex ® Stability System

Abstract

In recent years, computerized posturography has become an essential tool in quantitative assessment of postural steadiness in the clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to explore the ability of the Biodex^® Stability System (BSS) to quantify postural steadiness in below-knee amputees. A convenience sample of 10 below-knee amputees participated in the study. The overall (OSI), anterior–posterior (APSI) and medial–lateral (MLSI) stability indexes as well as the percentage of time spent in left and right quadrants and four concentric zones were measured under altered sensory conditions while standing with solid ankle cushion heel (SACH), single-axis (SA) and energy storage and release (ESAR) feet. Significant difference was found between sensory conditions in SACH and ESAR feet for OSI (SACH, p = 0.002; ESAR, p = 0.005), APSI (SACH, p = 0.036; ESAR, p = 0.003) and MLSI (SACH, p = 0.008; ESAR, p = 0.05) stability indexes. The percentage of time spent in Zone A (0°–5°) was significantly greater than the other three concentric zones (p < 0.01). The loading time percentage on their intact limb (80%–94%) was significantly longer than the amputated limb (20%–6%) in all conditions for all three prosthetic feet. Below-knee amputees showed compromised postural steadiness when visual, proprioceptive or vestibular sensory input was altered. The findings highlight that the characteristics of postural stability in amputees can be clinically assessed by utilizing the outcomes produced by the BSS.

Keywords

Amputees Biodex Stability System postural balance prosthesis rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Melzer

Benjuya

Kaplanski

. Postural stability in the elderly: a comparison between fallers and non-fallers. Age Ageing 2004; 33: 602–607.

Prieto

Myklebust

. Characterization and modeling of postural steadiness in the elderly: a review. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1993; 1: 26–34.

Horak

. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?Age Ageing 2006; 35: ii7–ii11.

Blackburn

Prentice

Guskiewicz

. Balance and joint stability: the relative contributions of proprioception and muscular strength. J Sport Rehabil 2000; 9: 315–328.

Shumway-Cook

Woollacott

. Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000; 55: M10–M16.

Winter

Patla

Frank

. Assessment of balance control in humans. Med Prog Technol 1990; 16: 31–51.

Miller

Deathe

Speechley

. The influence of falling, fear of falling, and balance confidence on prosthetic mobility and social activity among individuals with a lower extremity amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1238–1244.

Geurts

ACH

Mulder

. Reorganisation of postural control following lower limb amputation: theoretical considerations and implications for rehabilitation. Physiother Theor Pract 1992; 8: 145–157.

Blumentritt

Schmalz

Jarasch

. Effects of sagittal plane prosthetic alignment on standing trans-tibial amputee knee loads. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999; 23: 231–238.

10.

Buckley

O’Driscoll

Bennett

. Postural sway and active balance performance in highly active lower-limb amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 13–20.

11.

Isakov

Mizrahi

Ring

. Standing sway and weight-bearing distribution in people with below-knee amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 174–178.

12.

Barnett

Vanicek

Polma

RCJ

. Postural responses during volitional and perturbed dynamic balance tasks in new lower limb amputees: a longitudinal study. Gait Posture 2012; 37: 319–325.

13.

Kozakova

Svoboda

Janura

. Assessment of postural stability in patients with a transtibial amputation with various times of prosthesis use. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Gymn 2009; 39: 51–59.

14.

Vanicek

Strike

McNaughton

. Postural responses to dynamic perturbations in amputee fallers versus non-fallers: a comparative study with able-bodied subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1018–1025.

15.

Yim-Chiplis

Talbot

. Defining and measuring balance in adults. Biol Res Nurs 2000; 1: 321–331.

16.

Hinman

. Factors affecting reliability of the Biodex Balance System: a summary of four studies. J Sport Rehabil 2000; 9: 240–252.

17.

Testerman

Griend

. Evaluation of ankle instability using the Biodex Stability System. Foot Ankle Int 1999; 20: 317–321.

18.

Aydog

Bal

Aydog

. Evaluation of dynamic postural balance using Biodex Stability System in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol 2006; 25: 462–467.

19.

Salsabili

Bahrpeyma

Forogh

. Dynamic stability training improves standing balance control in neuropathic patients with type 2 diabetes. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011; 48: 775–786.

20.

Devlin

Pauley

Head

. Houghton Scale of prosthetic use in people with lower-extremity amputations: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1339–1344.

21.

Wong

Chen

Welsh

. Preliminary assessment of balance with the Berg Balance Scale in adults who have a leg amputation and dwell in the community: Rasch rating scale analysis. Phys Ther 2013; 93: 1520–1529.

22.

English

Hubbard

McElroy

. Establishment of consistent gait after fitting of new components. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995; 32: 32–35.

23.

Goh

JCH

Solomonidis

Spence

. Biomechanical evaluation of SACH and uniaxial feet. Prosthet Orthot Int 1984; 8: 147–154.

24.

Hafner

. Clinical prescription and use of prosthetic foot and ankle mechanisms: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Orthot 2005; 17: 5–11.

25.

Noonan

. Productivity commission submission inquiry into disability care & support, http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/disability-support/submissions/sub0301.pdf (2010, accessed 12 October 2014).

26.

Arnold

Schmitz

. Examination of balance measures produced by the Biodex Stability System. J Athl Train 1998; 33: 323–327.

27.

Burke

Roman

Wright

. Bone and joint changes in lower limb amputees. Ann Rheum Dis 1978; 37: 252–254.

28.

Mcllroy

Maki

. Preferred placement of the feet during quiet stance: development of a standardized foot placement for balance testing. Clin Biomech 1995; 12: 66–70.

29.

Borg

Laxaback

. Entropy of balance—some recent results. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010; 38: 1–11.

30.

Woollacott

. Multisensory training of standing balance in older adults: I. Postural stability and one-leg stance balance. J Gerontol 1994; 49: M52–M61.

31.

Cachupe

Shifflett

Kahanov

. Reliability of Biodex Balance System measures. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2001; 5: 97–108.

32.

Gear

Bookhout

Solyntjes

. Effect of ankle taping and bracing on dynamic balance and perception of stability. Int J Exerc Sci 2011; 5: S13–S14.

33.

Cohen

. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.

34.

Horak

Nashner

. Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 1986; 55: 1369–1381.

35.

Mayer

Tihanyi

Bretz

. Adaptation to altered balance conditions in unilateral amputees due to atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled study. BMC Muscoskel Disord 2011; 12: 118–124.

36.

Nadollek

Brauer

Isles

. Outcomes after trans-tibial amputation: the relationship between quiet stance ability, strength of hip abductor muscles and gait. Physiother Res Int 2002; 7: 203–214.

37.

Clark

Zernicke

. Balance in lower limb child amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1981; 5: 11–18.

38.

Gailey

Allen

Castles

. Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45: 15–29.