Reduction of endwall secondary flow losses with leading-edge fillet in a highly loaded low-pressure turbine

Abstract

A detailed experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of leading-edge fillet on the endwall secondary flow was performed in a highly loaded low-pressure turbine cascade. The objective is to gain further understanding on the reduction mechanism of endwall secondary flow losses by leading-edge fillet. The results suggest that the numerical results offer a reliable prediction for the endwall secondary flow structure together with suction surface separation bubble. A pressure-side corner separation vortex is found in the front part of pressure surface/endwall junction, where an inverse flow goes upward and over the leading edge to suction side of the same blade. This inverse flow also takes part in the interaction between endwall secondary flow and separation bubble. However, the leading-edge fillet can fill the region of corner separation vortex, and the inverse flow is eliminated. Combined with the reduction of cross-pressure gradient achieved by this fillet, the loss coefficient and flow angle deviation at exit plane are decreased. Besides, the leading-edge fillet will reduce the intensity of leading-edge horseshoe vortex and thus decrease the loss of passage vortex and shed vortex. It is these three aspects introduced by leading-edge fillet that achieves an effective reduction of the endwall secondary loss in turbine.

Keywords

Secondary flow losses leading-edge fillet corner separation vortex horseshoe vortex secondary flow/separation bubble interaction teardrop highly loaded turbine

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Denton

. The 1993 IGTI scholar lecture: Loss mechanisms in turbomachines. J Turbomach 1993; 115: 621–656.

Sharma

Butler

. Predictions of endwall losses and secondary flows in axial flow turbine cascades. J Turbomach 1987; 109: 229–236.

Langston

Nice

Hooper

. Three-dimensional flow within a turbine cascade passage. J Eng Power 1977; 99: 21–28.

Sieverding

Bosche

. The use of coloured smoke to visualize secondary flows in a turbine-blade cascade. J Fluid Mech 1983; 134: 85–90.

Goldstein

Spores

. Turbulent transport on the endwall in the region between adjacent turbine blades. J Heat Transfer 1988; 110: 862–862.

Wang

Olson

Goldstein

. Flow visualization in a linear turbine cascade of high performance turbine blades. J Turbomach 1997; 119: 1–8.

Sung CH and Lin CW. Numerical investigation on the effect of fairing on the vortex flows around airfoil/flat-plate junctures. In: AlAA 26th aerospace sciences meeting, Reno, Nevada, 11–14 January 1988, AIAA-88-0615.

Sauer H and Wolf H. Influencing the secondary flow in turbine cascades by the modification of the blade leading edge. In: European conference on turbomachinery, Antwerpen, 1997.

Sauer

Muller

Vogeler

. Reduction of secondary flow losses in turbine cascades by leading edge modifications at the endwall. J Turbomach 2001; 123: 207–213.

10.

Zess

Thole

. Computational design and experimental evaluation of using a leading edge fillet on a gas turbine vane. J Turbomach 2002; 124: 167–175.

11.

Lethander AT, Thole KA, Zess G, et al. Optimizing the vane-endwall junction to reduce adiabatic wall temperatures in a turbine vane passage. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2003: Power for land, sea, and air, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 16–19 June 2003, GT2003-38940.

12.

Turgut ÖH and Camcı C. Experimental investigation and computational evaluation of contoured endwall and leading edge fillet configurations in a turbine NGV. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, 11–15 June 2012, GT2012-69304.

13.

Wei

Qiao

Zhao

. Numerical investigation of endwall losses control in turbine by leading edge fillet based on teardrop curves. J Aerosp Power 2015; 30: 473–482.

14.

Qiao

Sun

. Tip clearance flows in turbine cascades. Chin J Aeronaut 2008; 21: 193–199.

15.

Balasubramanian R, Barrows S and Chen JP. Investigation of shear-stress transport turbulence model for turbomachinery applications. In: 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 7–10 January 2008, AIAA-2008-566.

16.

Krishnababu S, Newton PJ, Dawes WN, et al. Aero-thermal investigations of tip leakage flow in axial flow turbines-Part I: Effect of tip geometry and tip clearance gap. In: Proceedings of GT2007, ASME turbo expo 2007: Power for land, sea and air, Montreal, Canada, 14–17 May 2007, GT2007-27954.

17.

Wei ZJ, Qiao WY, Shi PJ, et al. Influence of turbulence modeling on the secondary flow prediction. In: Proceedings of 4th international symposium on jet propulsion and power engineering, Xi’an, China, 10–12 September 2012, ISJPPE-2012-H0025.

18.

Mayle

. The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines. J Turbomach 1991; 113: 509–536.

19.

Langtry RB. A correlation-based transition model using local variables for unstructured parallelized CFD codes. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2006.

20.

Steurer A, Benton SI and Bons JP. Effect of endwall boundary layer thickness on losses in a LPT cascade with unsteady wakes. In: Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2014: Turbine technical conference and exposition, Düsseldorf, Germany, 16–20 June 2014, GT2014-26921.

21.

Gregory-Smith

Graves

Walsh

. Growth of secondary losses and vorticity in an axial turbine cascade. J Turbomach 1988; 110: 1–8.

22.

Blanco

Hodson

Vazquez

. Influence of the state of the inlet endwall boundary layer on the interaction between pressure surface separation and endwall flows. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 2003; 217: 433–441.

23.

Duden

Fottner

. Influence of taper, Reynolds number and Mach number on the secondary flow field of a highly loaded turbine cascade. Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy 1997; 211: 309–320.