Assessment of organic working fluids feasibility for an ORC plant with waste heat recovery coupled to the gas turbine: Case study of the SGT-A65 intercooler unit
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Assessment of organic working fluids feasibility for an ORC plant with waste heat recovery coupled to the gas turbine: Case study of the SGT-A65 intercooler unit
This study investigates the application of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) technology for recovering waste energy from the intercooler in the Siemens SGT-A65 gas turbine. ORC demonstrates high energy recovery potential for mid-grade waste heat within the 100–200°C range, which aligns with the temperature range available from the intercooler. Using EES software for thermodynamic modeling and analysis to evaluate various working fluids and operating conditions, comparing the performance of the standard gas turbine cycle with modified configurations. Findings indicate that ORC integration significantly enhances energy recovery efficiency, achieving an improvement of up to 7.51% in overall thermal performance while using R123 as the working fluid, along with a reduction of 9.65 $/MWh in LCOE compared to the baseline while using Ethanol as the working fluid. Furthermore, environmental analysis reveals a 14.85% reduction in carbon emissions (0.354 kg CO2/kWh) while using R123 at 3.5 MPa HRVG pressure, enhancing the system’s environmental sustainability. Economic feasibility is also examined, emphasizing the potential for sustainable energy management. Recommendations focus on optimizing performance and minimizing environmental impact to encourage broader adoption.
AbdallahLEl-ShennawyT. A feasibility study for utilizing waste heat to generate electrical power using organic rankine cycle (ORC). Int J Innovat Sustain Dev2023; 4(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijisd.2023.195227.1031
CampanaFBianchiMBranchiniL, et al.ORC waste heat recovery in European energy intensive industries: energy and GHG savings. Energy Convers Manag2013; 76: 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.07.041
ZhangTLiuLHaoJ, et al.Correlation analysis based multi-parameter optimization of the organic rankine cycle for medium- and high-temperature waste heat recovery. Appl Therm Eng2021; 188: 116626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116626
8.
DalbakkenHErtesvågIS. Safety aspects of organic rankine cycles (ORC) with combustible working fluid and sub-ambient condenser pressure. Energy Rep2023; 11: 877–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.12.050
PasinatoHD. Working fluid dependence on source temperature for organic rankine cycles. J Energy Resour Technol2019; 142(1): 012103. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045383
12.
SprouseCE. Review of organic rankine cycles for internal combustion engine waste heat recovery: latest decade in review. Sustainability2024; 16(5): 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051924
13.
ShiLShuGTianH, et al.A review of modified organic rankine cycles (ORCs) for internal combustion engine waste heat recovery (ICE-WHR). Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018; 92: 95–110, ISSN 1364-0321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.023
14.
SánchezFDSalvadorJBMontesCM. Organic rankine cycle system review: thermodynamic configurations, working fluids, and future challenges in low-temperature power generation. Energies2025; 18(24): 6561. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18246561
15.
ZharRAllouhiAJamilA, et al.A comparative study and sensitivity analysis of different ORC configurations for waste heat recovery. Case Stud Therm Eng2021; 28: 101608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101608
16.
PatilVRBiradarVIShreyasR, et al.Techno-economic comparison of solar organic rankine cycle (ORC) and photovoltaic (PV) systems with energy storage. Renew Energy2017; 113: 1250–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.107
17.
ZhangXCaoMYangX, et al.Economic analysis of organic rankine cycle using R123 and R245FA as working fluids and a demonstration project report. Applied Sciences2019; 9(2): 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9020288
18.
CandraOAliAAskarS, et al.Thermal and environmental optimization of an intercooled gas turbine toward a sustainable environment. Chemosphere2023; 339: 139624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139624
19.
LiuCHeCGaoH, et al.The environmental impact of organic rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment. Energy2013; 56: 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.045
SongJGuC. Analysis of ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) systems with pure hydrocarbons and mixtures of hydrocarbon and retardant for engine waste heat recovery. Appl Therm Eng2015; 89: 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.055
WeiDLuXLuZ, et al.Performance analysis and optimization of organic rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery. Energy Convers Manag2007; 48(4): 1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.10.020
25.
WangHLiHWangL, et al.Thermodynamic analysis of organic rankine cycle with hydrofluoroethers as working fluids. Energy Proc2017; 105: 1889–1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.554
26.
Özdeṁ iRE. Thermodynamic analysis of basic and regenerative organic rankine cycles using dry fluids from waste heat recovery. J Therm Eng2018; 4(5): 2381–2393. https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.439288
ElmaihyARashadAElweteedyA, et al.Energy and exergy analyses for organic rankine cycle driven by cooling water of passenger car engine using sixteen working fluids. Energy Convers Manag2023; X(20): 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100415
NiuJWangJLiuX. Thermodynamic and economic analysis of organic rankine cycle combined with flash cycle and ejector. Energy2023; 282: 128982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128982
MosaffaAFarshiLGFerreiraCI, et al.Exergoeconomic and environmental analyses of CO2/NH3 cascade refrigeration systems equipped with different types of flash tank intercoolers. Energy Convers Manag2016; 117: 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.03.053
HuSLiJYangF, et al.How to design organic Rankine cycle system under fluctuating ambient temperature: a multi-objective approach. Energy Convers Manag2020; 224: 113331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113331
36.
EshaghiSHamrangF. An innovative techno-economic analysis for the selection of an integrated ejector system in the flare gas recovery of a refinery plant. Energy2021; 228: 120594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120594
37.
LiTGaoHGaoX. Synergetic mechanism of organic Rankine flash cycle with ejector for geothermal power generation enhancement. J Clean Prod2022; 375: 134174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134174
TashtoushBMorosukTChudasamaJ. Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a cogeneration hybrid solar organic rankine cycle with ejector. Entropy2020; 22(6): 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22060702
40.
MignardD. Correlating the chemical engineering plant cost index with macro- economic indicators. Process Safety and Environmental Protection/Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers. Part B, Process Safety and Environmental Protection/Chemical Engineering Research and Design/Chemical Engineering Research & Design2014; 92(2): 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2013.07.022
41.
LyuLKanAChenW, et al.Energy, exergy and environmental analysis of ORC waste heat recovery from container ship exhaust gases based on voyage cycle. J Mar Sci Eng2023; 11(10): 2029. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11102029
42.
MaQChenYLiuA, et al.Benefit analysis of organic rankine cycle power generation by using waste heat recovery in refinery. E3S Web of Conferences2022; 352: 02014. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235202014
43.
AbdunnabiMEtiabNNassarYF, et al.Energy savings strategy for the residential sector in Libya and its impacts on the global environment and the nation economy. Adv Build Energy Res2023; 17(4): 379–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2023.2209094
