This article focuses on practical reasoning in political discourse and argues for a better integration of argumentation theory with critical discourse analysis (CDA). Political discourse and its specific genres (for example, deliberation) primarily involve forms of practical reasoning, typically oriented towards finding solutions to problems and deciding on future courses of action. Practical reasoning is a form of inference from cognitive and motivational premises: from what we believe (about the situation or about means—end relations) and what we want or desire (our goals and values), leading to a normative judgement (and often a decision) concerning action. We offer an analysis of the main argument in the UK government’s 2008 Pre-Budget Report (HM Treasury, 2008) and suggest how a critical evaluation of the argument from the perspective of a normative theory of argumentation (particularly the informal logic developed by Douglas Walton) can provide the basis for an evaluation in terms of characteristic CDA concerns. We are advancing this analysis as a contribution to CDA, aimed at increasing the rigour and systematicity of its analyses of political discourse, and as a contribution to the normative concerns of critical social science.
Audi, R. ( 2001) The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Audi, R. ( 2006) Practical Reasoning and Ethical Decision. London and New York: Routledge .
3.
Audi, R. ( 2009) Business Ethics and Ethical Business. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bickenbach, J.E. and Davies, J.M. ( 1998) Good Reasons for Better Arguments. OntarioBroadview Press.
5.
Billig, M. ( 1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, new edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Blackburn, S. ( 1998) Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
Bowell, T. and Kemp, G. ( 2005) Critical Thinking: A Concise Guide. London and New York: Routledge .
8.
Dryzek, J.S. ( 2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Fairclough, N. ( 1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge : Polity Press.
10.
Fairclough, N. ( 2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research . London and New York: Routledge.
11.
Fairclough, N. and Fairclough, I. ( 2010) ‘Argumentation Theory in CDA: Analyzing Practical Reasoning in Political Discourse’, in R. de Cillia, H. Gruber, M. Krzyzanowski and F. Menz (eds) Diskurs-Politik-Identität [Discourse-Politics-Identity] , pp. 59-70. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
12.
Fairclough, N. and Fairclough, I. (forthcoming a) Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
13.
Fairclough, I. and Fairclough, N. (forthcoming b) ‘Practical Reasoning in Political Discourse: Moral and Prudential Arguments in the Debate over Bankers’ Bonuses in the British Press’ , Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat.
14.
Fairclough, N., Jessop, B. and Sayer, A. ( 2004) ‘Critical Realism and Semiosis’, in J. Joseph and J.M. Robe (eds) Realism, Discourse and Deconstruction. London: Routledge.
15.
Gauthier, D. ( 1963) Practical Reasoning: The Structure and Foundations of Prudential and Moral Arguments and their Exemplification in Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.
Govier, T. ( 2001) A Practical Study of Argument, 5th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
17.
Habermas, J. ( 1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society . London: Heinemann.
18.
HM Treasury (2008) ‘Pre-Budget Report Statement to the House of Commons, Delivered by the Rt Hon Alistair Darling MP, Chancellor of the Exchequer’, at www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/prebud_pbr08_speech.htm (accessed 25 March 2010).
19.
Ieţcu, I. (2006a ) Dialogue, Argumentation and Ethical Perspective in the Essays of H-R. Patapievici. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
20.
Ieţcu, I. (2006b ) Discourse Analysis and Argumentation Theory: Analytical Framework and Applications. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
21.
Ieţcu, I. ( 2006c) ‘Argumentation, Dialogue and Conflicting Moral Economies in Post-1989 Romania’, Discourse & Society17(5): 627-50.
22.
Ieţcu-Fairclough, I. ( 2008) ‘Legitimation and Strategic Maneuvering in the Political Field’, Argumentation22: 399-417.
23.
Ieţcu-Fairclough, I. ( 2009) ‘Legitimation and Strategic Maneuvering in the Political Field’, in F.H. van Eemeren (ed.) Examining Argumentation in Context, pp. 131-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24.
Johnson, R.H. ( 2000) Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kock, C. ( 2007b) ‘Dialectical Obligations in Political Debate’ , Informal Logic27(3): 233-47.
27.
Millgram, E. (ed.) (2001) Varieties of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Millgram, E. ( 2005) Ethics Done Right: Practical Reasoning as a Foundation for Moral Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Raz, J. (ed.) (1978) Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Reed, C. and Rowe, G. ( 2005) Araucaria, Version 3. Available at: www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/araucaria (accessed 10 October 2010).
31.
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. ( 2001) Discourse and Discrimination. London : Routledge.
32.
Ricoeur, P. ( 2008) From Text to Action. London: Continuum.
33.
Searle, J.R. ( 2010) Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
34.
Van Eemeren, F.H. (ed.) (2009) Examining Argumentation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35.
Van Eemeren, F.H. ( 2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36.
Van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. ( 2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Walton, D. ( 2007) Media Argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Walton, D. ( 2008) Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Walton, D., Reed, C. and Macagno, F. ( 2008) Argumentation Schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Williams, B. ( 2001) ‘Internal and External Reasons, with Postscript’ , in E. Millgram (ed.) Varieties of Practical Reasoning, pp. 77-98. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
41.
Wodak, R. ( 2009) The Discourse of Politics in Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. and Liebhart, K. ( 1999) The Discursive Construction of Austrian National Identity . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
43.
Zagar, I.Z. ( 2010) ‘Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis’, Lodz Papers in Pragmatics6.1( 2010): 3-27.
44.
Zagar, I.Z. (forthcoming) ‘The Use and Misuse of Topoi: Critical Discourse Analysis and Discourse-Historical Approach’, Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat.
