This article examines whether Eastern enlargement has led the EU 15 member states to enter strategic interactions implying a race to the bottom. The question is whether concerns about welfare migration have led to downward pressure on the EU 15 member states in the form of more restrictive access to their labour markets and adjustments of their social policy benefits. We find little empirical evidence to support the asumption that welfare states with generous benefits and accessible labour markets will become magnets for welfare migration. Nevertheless, the study demonstrates that the EU 15 member states do enter strategic interactions as if such migration would occur. The majority of them have temporarily restricted the free movement of workers from the acceding countries. EU 15 member states with the least restrictions are the ones most active in adjusting their social policies. Strategic interactions in social policy may thus intensify in the future as transitional periods come to an end and future enlargements come into place.
Ahern, B. (2004) ‘Ahern Speaks of Possible Impact of Enlargement on Irish Labour Market’, press release (23 Feb.). [www.eu2004.ie].
2.
BeskÊftigelsesministeriet (2003a) Danske sociale ydelser i lyset af udvidelsen af EU. Copenhagen: Ministry of Employment.
3.
BeskÊftigelsesministeriet (2003b) Agreement among the Liberals, the Conservatives, the Social Democrats, the Socialist People’s Party, the Social Liberals and the Christian DemocratsConcerning Access to the Danish Labour Market after the Enlargement of the European Union on 1 May 2004. Copenhagen: Ministry of Employment.
4.
Boeri, T. and Brücker, H. (2003) Potential Migration from Central and Eastern Europe, an Update. Brussels: DG Employment and Social Affairs.
5.
Brücker, H. et al. (2001) The Impact of EasternEnlargement on Employment and Labour Markets in the EU Member States, Analysis Part A and B. Brussels: DG Employment and Social Affairs.
6.
Brueckner, J. K. (2000) ‘Welfare Reform and the Race to the Bottom: Theory and Evidence’, Southern Economic Journal66 (3): 505–525.
7.
Buller, J. and Gamble, A. (2002) ‘Conceptualising Europeanisation’, Public Policy and Administration17 (2): 4–24.
8.
Commission of the European Communities (2002) Free Movement of Workers – Achieving the Full Benefits and Potential. Communication from the Commission COM (2002) 694 final.
9.
Coughlan, M. (2004) ‘Minister for Social and Family Affairs, Mary Coughlan, to Announce New Social Welfare Code Restrictions for Ireland’, press release (24 Feb.). [www.eu2004.ie].
10.
Dagbladet (2004a) ‘Polske bêrplukkere vil f kontantstøtte’(7 Jan). www.dagbladet.no
11.
Dagbladet (2004b) ‘Arbeidsnekt for nye EUmedlemmer’ (31Jan.). www.dagbladet.no
12.
Dagens Nyheter (2004) ‘Regeringen vill 0begr‰nsa rörligheten inom EU’ (3 Feb.).www.dn.se
13.
Dustmann, C., Casanova, M., Fertig, M., Preston I. and Smith, C. (2003) The Impact of EU Enlargement on Migration Flows, Home Office Online Report 25/03. London: Home Office.
14.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
European Commission (2001) The Free Movement of Workers in the Context of Enlargement, Information Note. Brussels: European Commission.
16.
Eurostat (1999) Demographic Statistics Data 1960– 1999. Luxembourg: European Commission.
17.
Eurostat (2000) Patterns and Trends in International Migration in Western Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission.
18.
Eurostat (2003) ‘Purchasing Power Parities and Related Economic Indicators for EU, Acceding and Candidate Countries and EFTA’, Statistics in Focus, Economy and Finance, 64/2003.
19.
Eurostat (2004a) ‘First Demographic Estimates for 2003’, Statistics in Focus, Population and Social Conditions, 1/2004.
20.
Eurostat (2004b) ‘Quarterly Accounts’, Statistics in Focus, Economy and Finance, 2/2004.
21.
Ferrera, M. (2003) ‘European Integration and National Social Citizenship: Changing Boundaries, New Structuring?’, Comparative Political Studies36 (6): 611–652.
22.
Frederiksen, C. H. (2003) ‘Bred aftale om adgang til det danske arbejdsmarked for arbejdstagere fra de nye EU-lande’, press release by the Danish Minister of Employment (2 Dec.), Copenhagen.
23.
Guardian(2004a) ‘Benefit Hedge against New EU Workers’ (3 Feb.). [www.guardian.co.uk]
24.
Guardian(2004b) ‘EU Enlargement: Facts and Fears’ (23 Feb.). [www.guardian.co.uk]
25.
Guardian(2004c) ‘UK May Tighten Benefit Controls to Deter New EU Immigrants’ (5 Feb.). [www.guardian.co.uk]
26.
Haas, E. B. (1968) [1956] The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social and Economic Forces, 2nd edn.Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.
27.
Hansard(2004a) Commons Hansard Debates text for Monday 23 February.
28.
Hansard(2004b) Commons Hansard Debates text for Wednesday 4 and 11 February.
29.
Krieger, H. (2004) Migration Trends in an Enlarged Europe. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
30.
Kvist, J. (ed.) (2002a) VelfÊrdspolitik i et nyt Europa. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute of Social Research.
31.
Kvist, J. (ed.) (2002b) BeskÊftigelsespolitik i et nyt Europa. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute of Social Research.
32.
Leibfried, S. and Pierson, P. (2000) ‘Social Policy – Left to Courts and Markets?’, in H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds) Policy-making in the European Union, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
Martinsen, D. S. (2003) ‘Who Has the Right to Intra European Social Security? From Market Citizens to European Citizens and Beyond’, EUI Working Paper Law, No. 2003/13.
34.
OECD (various years) National Accounts, Vols I and II. Paris: OECD.
35.
Pierson, P. (2001) ‘Post-industrial Pressures on the Mature Welfare State’, in P. Pierson (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Rasmussen, A. F. (2002) ‘The European Council: One Europe’, speech by the Danish Prime Minister, Meeting of the European Council in Copenhagen on 12–13 December 2002.
37.
RollÈn, B. (2003) EU:s utvidgning och arbetskraftens rörlighet, SOU 2002:116. Stockholm: Foreign Ministry.
38.
Scharpf, F. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2002) ‘Theorizing EU Enlargement: Research Focus, Hypotheses, and the State of Research’, Journal of European Public Policy9 (4): 500–528.
40.
Schram, S., Nitz, L. and Krueger, G. (1998) ‘Without Cause or Effect: Reconsidering Welfare Migration as a Policy Problem’, American Journal of Political Science42 (1): 210–230.
41.
Sinn, H-W. (2002) ‘EU Enlargement and the Future of the Welfare State’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy49 (1): 104–115.
42.
Streeck, W. (1995) ‘From Market Making to State Building? Reflections on the Political Economy of European Social Policy’, in S. Leibfried and P. Pierson (eds) European Social Policy. Between Fragmentation and Integration. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
43.
SZW (2004) Middenen Oost-Europese werknemers onder vorwaarden toegelaten tot Nederlandse arbeidsmarket. Haag: Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid.
44.
UKonline(2004) ‘No UK Benefits for New EU Members’ (23 Feb.).
45.
UN (2000) ‘Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Ageing and Declining Populations?’, ESA/P/WD 160.
