Cervical spondylosis is exerting an increasingly severe impact on people’s daily lives. Owing to the proven effectiveness of mechanical traction therapy in cervical rehabilitation, considerable research efforts have been devoted to the development of cervical rehabilitation robots (CRR). This paper presents the design and implementation of a CRR driven by pneumatic artificial muscle (PAM). In contrast to conventional motor-driven mechanisms, PAM provides superior compliance and continuous deformation capability, thereby offering cushioning protection for the cervical spine during traction. To guarantee both stability and safety during rehabilitation, an active disturbance rejection sliding mode–admittance control (ADRSM-AC) strategy is proposed for achieving force–displacement coupled compliant control of the PAM. Specifically, an inner-loop active disturbance rejection sliding mode control (ADRSMC) is designed to suppress the inherent nonlinearities of PAM and external disturbances, enabling high-precision displacement regulation. On this basis, an outer-loop admittance control scheme is implemented to evaluate deviations between actual and desired traction forces. By inferring the patient’s cervical muscle strength and movement intention, the system adaptively adjusts the target trajectory, thereby ensuring compliant interaction. Comprehensive experimental validation on a robotic prototype confirms the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The results demonstrate that the control scheme achieves accurate position tracking while adaptively regulating the trajectory in accordance with patient intention, ultimately safeguarding cervical spine safety throughout the rehabilitation process.
MuheremuASunYYanK, et al. Effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion on patients with atypical symptoms related to cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg2016; 77(5): 395–399. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582015
QayyumSWaqasSAsimHM.Outcomes of mechanical traction and manual therapy in c5-c6 cervical spondylosis for radicular pain relief. Man Ther2017; 25(6.2800): 2–20832.
6.
Abd ElshafyMMIbrahimMEMohammedAK.Comparative study between continuous and intermittent cervical traction in treatment of chronic mechanical neck pain. Med J Cairo Univ2024; 91(12): 1301–1307. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjcu.2024.342719
7.
SherrodBASchwehrTWaldramD, et al. Motorized robotic closed cervical traction: biomechanical proof of concept. Spine2023; 48(15): E247–E254. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004605
8.
ShoaibMLaiCYBab-HadiasharA. A novel design of cable-driven neck rehabilitation robot (carneck). In: 2019 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), 2019, pp.819–825. New York, NY: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2019.8868660
9.
ZhangHAgrawalSK.Kinematic design of a dynamic brace for measurement of head/neck motion. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2017; 2(3): 1428–1435. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2017.2671409
10.
ZhangHAgrawalSK.An active neck brace controlled by a joystick to assist head motion. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2018; 3(1): 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2017.2728858
ZhangHChangB-CAgrawalSK.Using a robotic neck brace for movement training of the head–neck. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2019; 4(2): 846–853. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2019.2893415
13.
ZhangHChangB-CAndrewsJ, et al. A robotic neck brace to characterize head-neck motion and muscle electromyography in subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol2019; 6(9): 1671–1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.50864
14.
ZhangHHChangB-CRueY-J, et al. Using the motion of the head-neck as a joystick for orientation control. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2019; 27(2): 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2894517
15.
DemareeDZhangHH.A structurally enhanced neck exoskeleton to assist with head-neck motion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on medical robotics (ISMR), 2023, pp.1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMR57123.2023.10130255
16.
WuDSWangLLiP.A 6-DOF exoskeleton for head and neck motion assist with parallel manipulator and sEMG-based control. In: Proceedings of the international conference on control, decision and information technologies (CoDIT), 2016, pp.341–344. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoDIT.2016.7593585
17.
ZhangHLMaHGRenJZ, et al. Design and kinematic analysis of a cable-driven exoskeleton for cervical rehabilitation. In: 2023 IEEE 18th conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA), Ningbo, China, 2023, pp.1495–1500. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA58696.2023.10241451
ZhaoLGeLLYangYF.Active disturbance rejection trajectory tracking control for two-joint driven by pneumatic artificial muscles. In: 2015 international conference on fluid power and mechatronics (FPM), Harbin, China, 2015, pp.972–977. https://doi.org/10.1109/FPM.2015.7337256
20.
LiuQZuoJZhuC, et al. Design and control of soft rehabilitation robots actuated by pneumatic muscles: state of the art. Future Gener Comput Syst2020; 113: 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.06.046
21.
PustavrhJHočevarMPodržajP, et al. Comparison of hydraulic, pneumatic and electric linear actuation systems. Sci Rep2023; 13(1): 20938. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47602-x
22.
ZhangDZhaoXHanJ.Active model-based control for pneumatic artificial muscle. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2017; 64(2): 1686–1695. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2016.2606080
23.
ChavoshianMTaghizadehMMazareM.Hybrid dynamic neural network and PID control of pneumatic artificial muscle using the PSO algorithm. Int J Autom Comput2020; 17(3): 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-019-1196-5
24.
LinCJSieTYChuWL, et al. Tracking control of pneumatic artificial muscle-activated robot arm based on sliding-mode control. Actuators2021; 10(3): 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/act10030066
25.
SunNLiangDWuY, et al. Adaptive control for pneumatic artificial muscle systems with parametric uncertainties and unidirectional input constraints. IEEE Trans Ind Inform2020; 16(2): 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2019.2923715
YuanYWangZYuY, et al. Active disturbance rejection control for a pneumatic motion platform subject to actuator saturation: an extended state observer approach. Automatica2019; 107: 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2019.05.056
28.
SunBWangHXSuT, et al. Nonlinear active disturbance rejection controller design and tuning for permanent magnet synchronous motor speed control system. Proc CSEE2020; 40(20): 6715–6726.
FujikiTTaharaK.Series admittance–impedance controller for more robust and stable extension of force control. ROBOMECH J2022; 9: 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40648-022-00237-5
CaiYQChenJ.Adaptive tuning method of parameters of active disturbance rejection controller for nonlinear system. In: 2022 34th Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC), 2022, pp.3013–3018. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC55256.2022.10033973
33.
LiZLiangSGuoM, et al. ADRC-based underwater navigation control and parameter tuning of an amphibious multirotor vehicle. IEEE J Oceanic Eng2024; 49: 775–792. https://doi.org/10.1109/joe.2024.3353413
34.
GaoBZhengLShenW, et al. A summary of parameter tuning of active disturbance rejection controller. Recent Adv Electr Electron Eng2023; 16(3): 180–196. https://doi.org/10.2174/2352096516666221026093613
35.
HuangYHanJ.Analysis and design for the second order nonlinear continuous extended states observer. Chin Sci Bull2000; 45(21): 1938–1944. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02909682
36.
HuangY.A new synthesis method for uncertain systems the self-stable region approach. Int J Syst Sci1999; 30(1): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/002077299292641
37.
ZhaoLYangYXiaY, et al. Active disturbance rejection position control for a magnetic rodless pneumatic cylinder. IEEE Trans Ind Electron2015; 62(9): 5838–5846. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2015.2418319
38.
YangEZhengDZhaoJ, et al. Active disturbance rejection super-twisting integral sliding mode control of wrist rehabilitation robot driven by foldable air bag. Control Eng Pract2025; 164: 106505.
ZhangBYouSLiuM, et al. Design and parameter tuning of nonlinear active disturbance rejection controller for permanent magnet direct drive wind power converter system. IEEE Access2021; 9: 33836–33848. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3054667
ZhangZKZhangH.Fractional-order sliding mode with active disturbance rejection control for UAVs. Appl Sci2025; 15(2): 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020556
45.
BrownDFXieSQ.Model predictive control with optimal modelling for pneumatic artificial muscle in rehabilitation robotics: confirmation of validity though preliminary testing. Biomimetics2025; 10(4): 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10040208
46.
ZhouKZongQZhangB, et al. Model predictive control of pneumatic artificial muscle antagonist joint angle tracking based on BP Neural Network Modeling. IEEE Sens J2026; 26: 2064–2077. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2025.3620097
47.
QuLQiaoWQuL.Active-disturbance-rejection-based sliding-mode current control for permanent-magnet synchronous motors. IEEE Trans Power Electron2021; 36(1): 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2020.3003666
48.
NguyenTANguyenTL.Nonlinear active disturbance rejection mechanism based sliding mode control for enhancing electric power assisted steering performance. PLoS One2025; 20(4): e0321664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321664
