Multinational companies are often seen as (potential) agencies for disseminating similar employment practices across countries and hence encouraging industrial relations convergence. The relationship between centre and periphery helps determine the extent to which they perform this role. This article reports findings from research in the Spanish and British subsidiaries of a multinational, which indicate that, despite the considerable formal autonomy of local management, there were many indirect methods by which the head office could ensure conformity with common industrial relations policies.
References
1.
Burns, J.
, King, R., Delay, F. and Mallet, L. (1993) Training in the Agrofood Sector: A Survey of the FORCE Programme. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
2.
Cray, D.
(1984) `Control and Coordination in Multinational Corporations', Journal of International Business Studies15(2): 85-98.
3.
Doz, Y.L.
and Prahalad, C.K. (1991) `Managing DMNCs: A Search for a New Paradigm', Strategic Management Journal12 (special issue): 145-164.
4.
Edwards, P.K.
, Ferner, A. and Sisson, K. (1993) People and the Process of Management in the Multinational Company: A Review and some Illustrations. IRRU Working Papers in Industrial Relations, 43. Coventry: University of Warwick.
5.
Edwards, T. (1993) `Perceptions of Control: A Comparison of the Perceptions of Managers at the European and UK Headquarters of Foreign-Owned Firms in Britain', MA dissertation, University of Warwick.
6.
Egelhoff, W.G.
(1984) `Patterns of Control in US, UK, and European Multinational Corporations', Journal of International Business Studies15(2): 73-83.
7.
Ferner, A.
(1994) `Multinational Companies and Human Resource Management: An Overview of Research Issues', Human Resource Management Journal4(3): 79-102.
8.
Ferner, A.
and Edwards, P.K. (1995) `Power and the Diffusion of Organizational Change within Multinational Enterprises', European Journal of Industrial Relations1(2): 229-257.
9.
Geary, J.F.
(1992) `Employment Flexibility and Human Resource Management: The Case of Three American Electronics Plants', Work, Employment & Society6(2): 251-270.
10.
Ghoshal, S.
and Bartlett, C.A. (1990) `The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network', Academy of Management Review15: 603-625.
11.
Hamill, J.
(1984) `Labour Relations Decision Making within Multinational Corporations', Industrial Relations Journal15(2): 30-34.
12.
Harrison, B.
(1994) Lean and Mean. New York: Basic Books.
13.
Hedlund, G.
(1981) `Autonomy of Subsidiaries and Formalization of Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Swedish MNCs', in L. Otterbeck (ed.) The Management of Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in MNCs, pp. 25-78. London: Gower.
14.
Marginson, P.
(1992) `European Integration and Transnational Management-Union Relations in the Enterprise', British Journal of Industrial Relations30(4): 529-545.
15.
Marginson, P.
and Sisson, K. (1994) `The Structure of Transnational Capital in Europe: The Emerging Euro-company and its Implications for Industrial Relations', in R. Hyman and A. Ferner (eds) New Frontiers in European Industrial Relations, pp. 15-51. Oxford: Blackwell.
16.
Marginson, P.
, Buitendam, A., Deutschmann, C. and Perulli, P. (1993) `The Emergence of the Euro-company: Towards a European Industrial Relations?', Industrial Relations Journal24(3): 182-190.
17.
Martinez Lucio, M.
and Weston, S. (1994) `New Management Practices in a Multinational Corporation: The Restructuring of Worker Representation and Rights?', Industrial Relations Journal25(2): 110-121.
18.
Mendez, A.
(1994) `Which Articulations between Multinational Companies' Strategies and National Labour Frameworks? A French Case Study', paper for IREC Network Conference on `Multinational Companies and the Future of Collective Bargaining', Dublin, July.
19.
Mueller, F.
and Purcell, J. (1992) `The Europeanization of Manufacturing and the Decentralization of Collective Bargaining', InternationalJournal of Human Resource Management3(1): 15-34.
20.
Nohria, N.
and Ghoshal, S. (1991) `Requisite Complexity: Organizing Headquarters-Subsidiary Relations in MNCs', Working Paper 92-041. Cambridge: Harvard Business School.
21.
Perlmutter, H.
(1969) `The Tortuous Evolution of the Multinational Corporation', Columbia Journal of World Business4(1): 9-18.
22.
Perrow, C.
(1986) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 3rd edn.New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Pollert, A.
(1994) `The Single European Market, Multinational and Concentration: The Case of Food Manufacturing', Journal of Public Policies13(3): 77-96.
24.
Ramsay, H.
and Haworth, N. (1990) `Managing the MNE: The Emerging Theory of MNE and its Implications for Labour Resistance', in S. Clegg (ed.) Organization Theory and Class Analysis: New Approaches and New Issues, pp. 275-297. Berlin: De Gruyter.
25.
Rapakko, T.
(1987) Corporate Control and Parent Firms' Liability for their Controlled Foreign Subsidiaries: A Study on the Regulation of Corporate Conduct. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics.
26.
Sabel, C.F.
(1989) `Flexible Specialization and the Re-emergence of Regional Economies', in P. Hirst and J. Zeitlin (eds) Reversing Industrial Decline?, pp. 17-70. New York: St Martin's Press.
27.
Wickens, P.
(1987) The Road to Nissan: Flexibility, Quality, Teamwork. London: Macmillan.
