A statistical evaluation of the effects of gender differences in assessment of acute inhalation toxicity

Abstract

Acute inhalation toxicity of chemicals has conventionally been assessed by the median lethal concentration (LC₅₀) test (organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD) TG 403). Two new methods, the recently adopted acute toxic class method (ATC; OECD TG 436) and a proposed fixed concentration procedure (FCP), have recently been considered, but statistical evaluations of these methods did not investigate the influence of differential sensitivity between male and female rats on the outcomes. This paper presents an analysis of data from the assessment of acute inhalation toxicity for 56 substances. Statistically significant differences between the LC₅₀ for males and females were found for 16 substances, with greater than 10-fold differences in the LC₅₀ for two substances. The paper also reports a statistical evaluation of the three test methods in the presence of unanticipated gender differences. With TG 403, a gender difference leads to a slightly greater chance of under-classification. This is also the case for the ATC method, but more pronounced than for TG 403, with misclassification of nearly all substances from Globally Harmonised System (GHS) class 3 into class 4. As the FCP uses females only, if females are more sensitive, the classification is unchanged. If males are more sensitive, the procedure may lead to under-classification. Additional research on modification of the FCP is thus proposed.

Keywords

acute inhalation toxicity OECD test guidelines fixed concentration procedure gender differences

References

Trevan J. The error of determination toxicity. Proc R Soc 1927; 101B: 483-514.

Botham PA Acute systemic toxicity - prospects for tiered testing strategies. Toxicol In Vitro 2004; 18: 227-230.

Oecd. Guidelines for the testing of chemical substances. Acute inhalation toxicity . No. 403. Paris, 1981.

Oecd. Guideline for the testing of chemicals. Acute oral toxicity. No. 401. Paris, 1981.

Oecd. Harmonized integrated hazard classification system for human health and environmental effects of chemical substances. Paris, 1998.

Dixon WJ , Mood AM A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data. J Am Stat Assoc 1948; 43: 109-126.

Brownlee KA , Hodges JL , Rosenblatt M. The up-and-down method with small samples. J Am Stat Assoc 1953; 48: 262-277.

Dixon WJ The up-and-down method for small samples. J Am Stat Assoc 1965; 60: 967-978.

Oecd. Guidelines for the testing of chemical substances. Acute inhalation toxicity (revised). No. 403. Paris, 2009.

10.

Oecd. Guidelines for the testing of chemical substances. Acute inhalation toxicity - acute toxic class method. No. 436. Paris, 2009.

11.

Greiner M. ‘Report on Biostatistical Performance Assessment of Draft TG 436 Acute Toxic Class Method for Acute Inhalation Toxicity’, http://www.oecd.org/LongAbstract/0,3425,en_33873108_33844437_41762050_1_1_1_1,00.html (2008). Accessed 23 April 2010.

12.

Oecd. Guidelines for testing of chemical substances. Acute inhalation toxicity- fixed concentration procedure. Draft No. 433. Paris , 2004.

13.

Oecd. Guidelines for the testing of chemical substances. Acute oral toxicity - fixed dose method. No. 420. Paris , 2000.

14.

Stallard N. , Whitehead A. , Indans I. Statistical evaluation of the fixed concentration procedure for acute inhalation toxicity assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol 2003; 22: 575-585.

15.

Zbinden G. , Fluryroversi M. Significance of the LD50-test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical-substances . Arch Toxicol 1981; 47: 77-99.

16.

Lorke D. A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing. Arch Toxicol 1983; 54: 275-287.

17.

Tamborini P. , Sigg H. , Zbinden G. Acute toxicity testing in the nonlethal dose range: a new approach. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1990; 12: 69-87.

18.

Lipnick RL , Cotruvo JA , Hill RN , Bruce RD , Stitzel KA , Walker AP , et al. Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures. Food Chem Toxicol 1995; 33: 223-231.

19.

DePass LR Alternative approaches in median lethality (LD50) and acute toxicity testing. Toxicol Lett 1989 ; 49: 159-170.

20.

Oecd. Guidance document on acute inhalation toxicity testing. Environmental health and safety monograph series on testing and assessment. No. 39. Paris, 2009.

21.

Stallard N. , Whitehead A. The fixed-dose procedure and the acute-toxic-class method: a mathematical comparison. Hum Exp Toxicol 1995; 14: 974-990.

22.

Stallard, N. , Price, C. , Creton, S. , et al. A new sighting study for the fixed concentration procedure to allow for gender differences. Hum Exp Toxicol (2010) DOI 10.1 177/0960327110370983.