Throughout Europe, science and technology policy within the environmental field is currently in a process of transformation, which has been characterised by many observers as ecological modernisation. Emphasis is being given to preventive principles and so-called cleaner technologies in the quest for a more sustainable development. Each European country has, however, adapted the new doctrines and practices in distinctive ways. The main aim of the paper is to show how contemporary policies have been shaped by history, more specifically, by institutional and cognitive traditions, and by national policy styles. By comparing ‘ecological modernisation’ in Sweden and Denmark, we attempt to indicate how such national cultural differences affect the ways in which science and technology policies in the environmental field are formulated and implemented.
AndersenMikael Skou1997. ‘Conflict and Compromise in Environmental Policy: Capacity Building in Denmark’, in JänickeMartin and WeidnerHelmut (eds), National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study of Capacity Building, pp. 157–174. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
2.
BerggrenNiclas1997. Teskedsjobben: en kritisk granskning av idéerna om ‘gröna jobb’. Stockholm: Timbro.
3.
BorishSteven M.1991. The Land to the Living: The Danish Folk High Schools and Denmark's Non-violent Path to Modernization.Nevada City, CA: Blue Dolphin Publishing.
4.
EdquistCharles and Bengt-ÅkeLundvall1993. ‘Comparing the Danish and Swedish Systems of Innovation’, in NelsonRichard R. (ed.), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, pp. 265–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
ElzingaAant and JamisonAndrew1984. ‘Making Dreams Come True: On the Role of Practical Utopias in Science’, in EverettMendelsohn and HelgaNovotny (eds), Science Between Utopia and Dystopia (Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook), pp. 147–172. Dordrecht: Reidel.
6.
ElzingaAant, JamisonAndrew and MithanderConny1998. ‘Swedish Grandeur: Contending Reformulations of the Great Power Doctrine’, in HårdMikael and JamisonAndrew (eds), The Intellectual Approriation of Technology: Discourses on Modernity, 1900–1941, pp. 129–161. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
EyermanRon and JamisonAndrew1991. Social Movements. A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
FoucaultMichel1973. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage Books.
9.
HajerMaarten1996. ‘Ecological Modernisation as Cultural Politics’, in ScottLash, BronislawSzerszynski and BrianWynne (eds), Risk, Environment, Modernity, pp. 246–268. London: Sage.
10.
HårdMikael and JamisonAndrew (eds) 1998. The Intellectual Appropriation of Technology: Discourses on Modernity, 1900–1939. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
JamisonAndrew1982. National Components of Scientific Knowledge: A Contribution to the Social Theory of Science. Lund: Research Policy Institute.
12.
JamisonAndrew1996. ‘The Shaping of the Global Environmental Agenda: The Role of Non-governmental Organisations’, in ScottLash, BronislawSzerszynski and BrianWynne (eds), Risk, Environment, Modernity, pp. 224–245. London: Sage.
13.
JamisonAndrew and PerØstby (eds) 1997. Public Participation and Sustainable Development; Comparing European Experiences. PESTO Papers 1. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
14.
JamisonAndrew, RonEyerman, CramerJacqueline with LæssøeJeppe1990. The Making of the New Environmental Consciousness: A Comparative Study of the Environmental Movements in Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
15.
JørgensenUlrik and KarnøePeter1995. ‘The Danish Wind-Turbine Story: Technical Solutions to Political Visions?’, in RipArie, MisaTom and SchotJohan (eds), Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, pp. 57–82. London: Pinter Publishers.
16.
LindrothSten1952. Swedish Men of Science. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
17.
LæssøeJeppe1995. Folkeoplysning – en vej til miljøansvarlig handlen? (Arbejdsrapport fra Miljøstyrelsen, No. 2, 1995). Copenhagen: Miljøstyrelsen
18.
LundqvistLennart J.1996. ‘Sweden’, in ChristiansenPeter Munk (ed.), Governing the Environment: Politics, Policy, and Organisation in the Nordic Countries, pp. 259–338. Oslo: Nordic Council of Ministers, 1996.
19.
LundvallBengt-Åke1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
20.
NelsonRichard (ed.) 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
RemmenArne1995. ‘Pollution Prevention, Cleaner Technologies and Industry’, in RipArie, MisaTom and SchotJohan (eds), Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, pp. 199–224. London: Pinter Publishers.
22.
RemmenArne1998. ‘Innovation Concepts and Cleaner Technologies: Experiences from three Danish Action Plans’, in JamisonAndrew (ed.), Technology Policy Meets the Public. PESTO Papers 2. Aalborg University Press.
23.
RingMagnus1997. ‘Vägar till en hållbart samhälle. En fallstudie av tre svenska kommuners Agenda 21 arbete’, Paper presented at the Nordic Congress of Sociology, Copenhagen, June.
24.
SenghaasDieter1982. Von Europa Lernen: Entwicklungsgeshiichtliche Betrachtungen.Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
25.
SöderqvistThomas1986. The Ecologists: From Merry Nauralists to Saviiours of the Nation. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.
26.
VeblenThorstein1915. Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution. New York: Macmillan.
27.
WorsterDonald1977. Nature's Economy: The Roots of Ecology. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
