The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of persons with severe functional disabilities who receive personal assistance in their homes, the focus being on their daily life in relation to the ethical principles represented in the Swedish Disability Act: autonomy, integrity, influence and participation. Qualitative interviews were performed with 26 persons and thereafter subjected to qualitative latent content analysis. The experiences of personal assistance were very much in accordance with the said principles, the most important factor being that one is met with understanding. The participants described situations in which their integrity was violated in that they were not treated as competent adults. This indicates the importance of future efforts in nursing to support personal assistants with ethical knowledge and supervision so that they can empower people with disabilities and thereby enable them to maintain their self-esteem and dignity.
Charmaz K.Loss of self: a fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociol Health Illn1983; 5: 168-95.
2.
Nirje B.The normalization principle. In: Flynn RJ, Nitsch KE eds. Normalization, social integration, and community services. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1980: 31-49.
3.
Nirje B.A brief overview of the principle of normalization. In: Flynn RJ, Nitsch KE eds. Normalization, social integration, and community services. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1980: 7-29.
4.
Nirje B.How I came to formulate the normalization principle. In: Flynn RJ, Lemay RA eds. A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: evolution and impact. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press, 1999: 17-50.
5.
Wolfensberger W.The definition of normalization. Update, problems, disagreements, and misunderstandings . In: Flynn RJ, Nitsch KE eds. Normalization, social integration and community services. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1980: 71-115.
6.
Swedish Code of Statues, SFS (1993:387 and 1993:389). Act concerning support and service for persons with certain functional impairments and the Assistance Benefit Act . Stockholm: Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, International Secretariat, 1993.
7.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JFPrinciples of biomedical ethics, fifth edition. New York : Oxford University Press, 2001.
8.
Pellegrino E.The relationship of autonomy and integrity in medical ethics. Bull Pan Am Health Organ1990 ; 24: 361-71.
9.
Andersson M.Integritet som begrepp och princip: en studie av ett vårdetiskt ideal i utveckling. (Integrity as a concept and a principle. A study of a nursing ethics ideal in progress.) [Doctoral dissertation] Åbo : Åbo Akademis förlag, 1994 (in Swedish).
10.
Hyland D.An exploration of the relationship between patient autonomy and patient advocacy: implications for nursing practice. Nurs Ethics2002; 9: 472-82.
11.
Cahill J.Patient participation: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs1998; 7: 119-28.
12.
Sahlsten M., Larsson I., Sjöström B., Lindencrona C., Plos K.Patient participation in nursing care: towards a concept clarification from a nursing perspective. J Clin Nurs2007; 16: 630-37.
13.
Ahlström G.Experiences of loss and chronic sorrow in persons with severe chronic illness. J Clin Nurs2007; 16: 76-83.
14.
Marr J.The experience of living with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci Nurs1991; 23: 325-29.
15.
Schaefer K.Women living in a paradox: loss and discovery in chronic illness. Holist Nurs Pract1995; 9: 63-74.
16.
Wadensten B., Ahlström G.The struggle for dignity by people with severe functional disablilities. Nurs Ethics2009; 16: 453-65.
17.
Statistika centralbyrån. (Statistics Sweden.) Statistical yearbook of Sweden 2001. Vol. 87. Stockholm: SCB, 2000.
18.
Graneheim UH, Lundman B.Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurs Educ Today2004; 24: 105-12.
19.
Downe-Wamboldt B.Content analysis: methods, applications and issues. Health Care Women Int1992; 13: 313-21.
20.
Jumisko E., Lexell J., Söderberg S.The meaning of living with traumatic brain injury in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs2005; 37: 42-50.
21.
Isaksson AK, Ahlström G.From symptom to diagnosis: illness experiences of multiple sclerosis patients . J Neurosci Nurs2006; 38: 229-37.
22.
Edmonds P.Fighting for everything: service experiences of people severely affected by multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2007; 13: 660-67.
23.
Boström K., Ahlström G., Sunvisson H.Being the next of kin of an adult person with muscular dystrophy. Clin Nurs Res2006; 15: 86-104.
24.
Jumisko E., Lexell J., Söderberg S.Living with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. The meaning of family members’ experiences. J Fam Nurs2007 ; 13: 353-69.
25.
Papastavrou E., Charalambous A., Tsangari H.Exploring the other side of cancer care: the informal caregiver. Eur J Oncol Nurs2009; 13(2): 128-36. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
26.
Drought TS, Koenig BAChoice in end-of-life decision making: researching fact or fiction?Gerontologist2002; 42(3): 114-28.
27.
Gillon R.Ethics needs principles - four can encompass the rest - and respect for autonomy should be ‘first among equals’. J Med Ethics2003; 29: 307-12.
28.
Schröder A., Ahlström G., Wilde Larsson B.Patients’ perceptions of the concept of the quality of care in the psychiatric setting: a phenomenographic study . J Clin Nurs2006; 15: 93-102.
29.
Davies S., Laker S., Ellis L.Promoting autonomy and independence for older people within nursing practice: a literature review. J Adv Nurs1997; 26: 408-17.
30.
Moser A., Houtepen R., Widdershoven G.Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care: a review of theoretical and empirical literature. J Adv Nurs2007; 57: 357-65.
31.
Matsuda SJ, Clark MJ, Schopp LH, Mokelke EK, Hagglund KJBarriers and satisfaction associated with personal assistant services: result of consumer and personal assistant focus groups. OTJR Occup Participation Health2005; 25(2): 66-74.
32.
Hagglund KJ , Clark MJ, Farmer JE, Sherman AKA comparision of consumer-directed and agency-directed personal assistance services programmes. Disabil Rehabil2004; 26: 518-27.
33.
Rolland JSFamily systems and chronic illness: a typological model. J Psychother Fam1987; 3: 143-68.
34.
Huycke L., All ACQuality in health care and ethical principles. J Adv Nurs2000; 32: 562-71.
35.
Thomas S., Wolfensberger W.An overview of social role valorization. In: Flynn RJ, Lemay RA eds. A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: evolution and impactOttowa, ON: University of Ottawa Press, 1999; 125-59.
36.
Magnusson A. , Lützén K.Intrusion into patient privacy: a moral concern in the home care of persons with chronic mental illness . Nurs Ethics1999; 6: 399-410.
37.
Leino-Kilpi H., Välimäki M., Dassen T. et al. Perceptions of autonomy, privacy and informed consent in the care of elderly people in five European countries: comparison and implications for the future. Nurs Ethics2003; 10: 58-66.
38.
Hansson B., Ahlström G.Coping with chronic illness: a qualitative study of coping with postpolio syndrome. Int J Nurs Stud1999; 36: 255-62.
