How Resilient Is ASEAN-5 to Trade Shocks? A Comparison of Regional and Global Shocks

Abstract

This article studies the resilience of the ASEAN region to external shocks amid the unfolding effects of the USA–China trade war. It investigates and compares the effects of regional (ASEAN) and global (USA, China) shocks on ASEAN-5 using a Structural VAR (SVAR) framework. To identify the propagation of economic shocks and spillovers on ASEAN-5, the changing trade links between the economies considered are used to account for time variations spanning the period 1978Q1–2018Q2. Three major results follow from the analyses on trade links and output multiplier effects. First, the response of ASEAN-5 to shocks from the USA and China were more pronounced than regional shocks for the period after the Asian financial crisis. Second, the increasing cumulative impact of China’s shock on ASEAN was congruous to the growing trade links and trade intensities between ASEAN and China. Third, the USA and China were dominant growth drivers for the weaker trade-linked ASEAN partners. Taken together, the results suggest that global shocks matter for the region, and the economic resilience of the region to global shocks depends on indirect effects apart from the direct trade links.

Keywords

Trade links SVAR model ASEAN-5 China USA

References

Abeysinghe

(2003). China as an economic powerhouse: Implications on its neighbors. China Economic Review, 14(2), 164–185.

Abeysinghe

Forbes

(2005). Trade linkages and output-multiplier effects: A structural VAR approach with a focus on Asia. Review of International Economics, 13(2), 356–375.

Anya

(2019, June 25). Benefits of US–China trade war for ASEAN only temporary: Expert. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from: https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/06/25/benefits-of-us-china-trade-war-for-asean-only-temporary-expert.html

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2019). Asia regional integration centre—Integration indicators (online database). Retrieved from https://aric.adb.org/database/integration

Baig

Goldfajn

(1999). Financial market contagion in the Asian crisis. IMF Staff Paper, 46(2), 167–195.

Baxter

Kouparitsas

M. A.

(2004). Determinants of business cycle co-movement: A robust analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(1), 113–157.

Berkmen

S. P.

Gelos

Rennhack

Walsh

J. P.

(2012). The global financial crisis: Explaining cross-country differences in the output impact. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31(1), 42–59.

Blanchard

O. J.

Das

Faruqee

(2010). The initial impact of the crisis on emerging market countries. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 2010(1), 263–307.

Bollen

Rojas-Romagosa

(2018). Trade wars: Economic impacts of US tariff increases and retaliations: An international perspective. CPB Background Document, CPB Bureau of Economic Policy Analysis, Netherlands. Retrieved from https://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/omnidownload/CPB-Background-Document-November2018-Trade-Wars-update.pdf

10.

Canova

(1991). The sources of financial crisis: Pre-and post-fed evidence. International Economic Review, 32(3), 689–713.

11.

Canova

Dellas

(1993). Trade interdependence and the international business cycle. Journal of International Economics, 34(1–2), 23–47.

12.

Cheewatrakoolpong

Manprasert

(2014). Trade linkages and spillovers. Asian Economic Papers, 13(1), 84–103.

13.

Cheewatrakoolpong

Manprasert

(2015). Trade diversification and crisis transmission: A case study of Thailand. Asian Economic Journal, 29(4), 385–408.

14.

Dungey

Martin

V. L.

(1998). Contagion in the East Asian currency crisis. La Trobe University, mimeo. Retrieved from http://www.business.latrobe.edu.au/staffhp/mardihp/mardi3.1

15.

Dungey

Vehbi

(2015). The influences of international output shocks from the US and China on ASEAN economies. Journal of Asian Economics, 39, 59–71.

16.

Dungey

Khan

Raghavan

(2018). International trade and the transmission of shocks: The case of ASEAN-4 and NIE-4 economies. Economic Modelling, 72, 109–121.

17.

Feldkircher

Korhonen

(2014). The rise of China and its implications for the global economy: Evidence from a global vector autoregressive model. Pacific Economic Review, 19(1), 61–89.

18.

Genberg

(2005). External shocks, transmission mechanisms and deflation in Asia (BIS Working Paper No. 187). Basel, Switzerland: Bank of International Settlements (BIS). Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/work187.pdf

19.

Gong

Junjie

(2019, August 2). The four Asian tigers are not immune to US–China trade war. The Diplomat. Retrieved from: https://thediplomat.com/2019/08/the-four-asian-tigers-are-not-immune-to-us-china-trade-war/

20.

Grubel

H. G.

Lloyd

P. J.

(1975). Intra-industry trade: The theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products. London, UK: The MacMillan Press Ltd.

21.

Guo

Sheng

(2018). The day after tomorrow: Evaluating the burden of Trump’s trade war. Asian Economic Papers, 17(1), 101–120.

22.

Haidar

J. I.

(2012). Currency crisis transmission through international trade. Economic Modelling, 29(2), 151–157.

23.

Harrigan

(2000). The impact of the Asia crisis on US industry: An almost-free lunch? Economic Policy Review, (Sep), 71–78.

24.

(2019, July 15). China’s economic growth slumps to lowest in 27 years as the trade war hits. CNN Business. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/15/economy/china-gdp-growth/index.html

25.

Huang

Salike

Zhong

(2017). Policy effect on structural change: A case of Chinese intermediate goods trade. China Economic Review, 44, 30–47.

26.

Imbs

(2004). Trade, finance, specialization and synchronization. Review of Economics & Statistics, 86(3), 723–734.

27.

Ito

Hashimoto

(2005). High-frequency contagion of currency crises in Asia. Asian Economic Journal, 19(4), 357–381.

28.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2019a). Direction of Trade Statistics (DOTS) (online database). Retrieved from http://data.imf.org/?sk=9D6028D4-F14A-464C-A2F2-59B2CD424B85

29.

International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2019b). World economic outlook—Growth slowdown, precarious recovery. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund:.

30.

International Trade Centre (ITC). (2019). International trade statistics. Retrieved from http://www.intracen.org/itc/market-info-tools/trade-statistics/

31.

Kana

(2019, June 5). Nomura: M’sia 4th biggest beneficiary of trade war. The Star,. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2019/06/05/nomura-msia-4th-biggest-beneficiary-of-trade-war/

32.

Lau

E. K. P. L.

(2008). Interdependence of income between China and ASEAN-5 countries. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 1(2), 148–161.

33.

Lauria

(2019, February 19). U.S.–China trade war boosts fast-growing Southeast Asia. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/vinnielauria/2019/02/19/u-s-china-trade-war-boosts-fast-growing-southeast-asia-2/#24b1e2b66f5e

34.

Masson

P. R.

(1998). Contagion: Monsoonal effects, spillovers, and jumps between multiple equilibria (IMF Working Paper No. 98/142). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/Contagion-Monsoonal-Effects-Spillovers-and-Jumps-Between-Multiple-Equilibria-2755

35.

Moeller

J. O.

(2018). U.S.–China trade war: Opportunities & risks for Southeast Asia (ISEAS Perspective No. 64). Singapore: ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute. Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2018_64@50.pdf

36.

Ong

S. L.

Sato

(2018). Regional or global shock? A global VAR analysis of Asian economic and financial integration. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 46, 232–248.

37.

Prana

J. R.

(2018). Implications of the growing tensions over trade between the US and China for ASEAN: What to expect and a way forward. Jakarta, Indonesia: Op-Ed May, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), Retrieved from: http://www.eria.org/uploads/media/opinion-articles/Implications-of-the-Growing-Tensions-over-Trade-between-the-US-and-China-for-ASEAN-What-to-Expect-and-A-Way-Forward_1.pdf

38.

Sato

Shrestha

(2014). Global and regional shock transmission—An Asian perspective (CESSA WP 2014-04). Centre for Economic and Social Studies in Asia (CESSA), Yokohama National University. Retrieved from https://www.econ.ynu.ac.jp/cessa/publication/pdf/CESSA%20WP%202014-04.pdf

39.

Sato

Zhang

McAleer

(2011). Identifying shocks in regionally integrated Asian economies with structural VAR and block exogeneity. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 81(7), 1353–1364.

40.

Thomas

(2019, May 13). ASEAN to gain most from trade war. The ASEAN Post. Retrieved from https://theaseanpost.com/article/asean-gain-most-trade-war

41.

Tobin

Power

(2019, May 18). The spoils of trade war: Asia’s winners and losers in US–China clash. South China Morning Post,. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/3010733/spoils-trade-war-asias-winners-and-losers-us-china-clash

42.

United Nations (UN). (2019). UN Comtrade database. Retrieved from https://comtrade.un.org/data/

43.

Utlaut

J. F.

van Roye

(2010). The effects of external shocks to business cycles in emerging Asia: A Bayesian VAR approach (Kiel Working Papers 1668). Kiel, Germany: Kiel Institute for the World Economy. Retrieved from https://www.ifw-kiel.de/fileadmin/Dateiverwaltung/IfW-Publications/Bjoern_van_Roye/the-effects-of-external-shocks-on-business-cycles-in-emeerging-asia-a-bayesian-var-approach/the-effects-of-external-shocks-on-business-cycles-in-emerging-asia-a-bayesian-var-model.pdf

44.

Wong

Koty

A. C.

(2019). The US–China trade war: A time line. China Briefing, 2nd August. Retrieved from https://www.china-briefing.com/news/the-us-china-trade-war-a-timeline/

45.

World Bank. (2019). World development indicators. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

46.

Yeo

(2018). China’s trade war pain can be ASEAN’s gain: How Southeast Asia is reaping a windfall of shifting trade and investment? Geopolitics, 16th October. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2168703/chinas-trade-war-pain-can-be-aseans-gain-how-southeast-asia

47.

Yuning

Junyi

(2016). Emerging China and its interaction with ASEAN economies. In Kim

Y.-C.

(Ed.), Chinese global production networks in ASEAN (pp. 1–18). Switzerland: Springer.