Abstract
Introduction
Serum amylase has all along been used to aid the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in hospitals in Hong Kong. Another serum marker lipase, on the other hand, has been claimed to have better accuracy in other countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum lipase as a diagnostic tool compared to the traditional serum amylase.
Methods
This was a retrospective study in a district hospital in Hong Kong. The two serum markers were taken from 3451 patients with acute abdominal pain who presented to our emergency department over an eight-month period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of both markers. Other diagnostic efficacy modalities, including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictor values were also calculated.
Results
Both amylase and lipase had high accuracy index in the area under the ROC curve (0.992 and 0.996 respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of amylase at 3-fold above normal limit were 63.6% and 99.4% while those of lipase were 95.5% and 99.2% respectively.
Conclusion
Both serum enzymes had good diagnostic accuracy in our study but lipase was slightly better than amylase.