There have been few studies of how New Zealand employers manage the increasing diversity in their workplaces and how workers respond to these efforts. This paper reports a telephone survey of 500 New Zealand workers’ perceptions of, and responses to, diversity management activities. Conducted in 2010, the survey was designed to reflect the gender and ethnicity profile of the contemporary workforce, and enables us to compare responses across different types and sizes of organisation. While the use of formal diversity policies and support activities is higher in the public sector, we find widespread use of family-friendly employment practices and a general perception of a good climate for diversity. Employees who report higher levels of family-friendly and proactive EEO practices are more committed to their organisation, more satisfied in their jobs, and more trusting of their employer. This helps to underline the ‘employee case’ for diversity management.
AronsonD. 2002. Managing the diversity revolution: Best practices for 21st century business. Civil Rights Journal6: 46–66.
2.
ArredondoP. 1996. Successful diversity management initiatives: A blueprint for planning and implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
3.
CookJWallT. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology53: 39–52.
4.
CoxT. 1993. Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
5.
CoxT. 2001. Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
6.
EdgarF. 2003. Equal employment opportunities: An empirical examination of employer and employee attitudes in New Zealand. International Journal of Employment Studies11(9): 97–130.
GreeneAKirtonG. 2009. Diversity management in the UK: Organizational and stakeholder experiences. New York: Routledge.
12.
HymanP. 2007. Pay equity and equal employment opportunity: Development between 2004–2007 and evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations32(3): 18–30.
13.
HymanP. 2008. Pay equity and equal employment opportunity – developments 2004/2006 and evaluation. In Proceedings of twelfth conference on labour, employment and work, BlumenfeldSBLaffertyG, 283–288. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
14.
JacksonSEJoshiA. 2004. Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multi-level analysis of team diversity and performance in a sales organization. Journal of Organizational Behavior25: 675–702.
15.
JehnKANorthcraftGBNealeMA. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 741–63.
16.
Jones D. 1998. Possibilities of transformation: discourses of difference in organisational communication. PhD thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
KalevADobbinFKellyE. 2006. Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review71: 589–617.
19.
KellerRR. 2001. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal44: 547–55.
20.
KirtonGGreeneA. 2005. The dynamics of managing diversity: A critical approach. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
21.
KochanTBezrukovaKElyRJacksonSJoshiAJehnKLeonardJLevineDThomasD. 2003. The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management42: 3–21.
22.
KonradAM. 2003. Defining the domain of workplace diversity scholarship. Group and Organization Management28: 4–17.
23.
KossekEEPichlerS. 2007. EEO and the management of diversity. The Oxford handbook of human resource management, BoxallPPurcellJWrightP, 251–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
LayneP. 2002. Best practices in managing diversity. Leadership and Management in Engineering2(4): 28–30.
25.
McKayPFAveryDRMorrisMA. 2008. Mean racial-ethnic differences in employee sales performance: The moderating role of diversity climate. Personnel Psychology61: 349–75.
26.
MackyKBoxallP. 2007. The relationship between high-performance work practices and employee attitudes: An investigation of additive and interaction effects. International Journal of Human Resource Management18: 537–67.
27.
MackyKBoxallP. 2008. High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: A study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources46: 38–55.
28.
MillikenFJMartinsL. 1996. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multipleeffects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review21: 402–33.
29.
Mor BarakME. 2005. Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
30.
New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs. 2008. Briefing to Minister of Ethnic Affairs 2008. Wellington.
New Zealand Ministry of Social Development. 2009. The social report 2009. Ministry of Social Development: Wellington.
33.
PlummerDL. 2003. Diagnosing diversity in organizations. Handbook of diversity management: Beyond awareness to competency based learning, PlummerDL, 243–69. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
34.
PodsiadlowskiA. 2006. Facilitating migrants’ entry and integration into the workplace: Final report. Strangers in town (FRST project, led by R Bedford). Hamilton: University of Waikato.
35.
Podsiadlowski A. 2007. Managing culturally diverse workforces: issues of recruitment and selection. Paper presented at Pathways, circuits and crossroads: New public good research on population, migration and community dynamics seminar, May, Wellington, New Zealand.
36.
PorterJC. 1995. Facilitating cultural diversity. Journal of Management in Engineering11: 39–43.
37.
PrasadPMillsAJ. 2000. From showcase to shadow: understanding the dilemmas of managing workplace diversity. Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity, PrasadPMillsAJElmesMPrasadA, 3–27. London: SAGE Publications.
38.
RichardOCMcMillanAChadwickKDwyerS. 2003. Employing an innovation strategy in racially diverse workforces: effects on firm performance. Group and Organization Management28: 107–26.
39.
RutherfordSOllerearnshawS. 2002. The business of diversity. How organizations in the public and private sectors are integrating equality and diversity to enhance business performance. Andover: Schneider-Ross.
40.
SadriGTranH. 2002. Managing your diverse workforce through improved communication. Journal of Management Development21: 227–37.
41.
ShawJBarrett-PowerE. 1998. The effects of diversity on small work group processes and performance. Human Relations51: 1307–25.
42.
SinghamM. 2006. Multiculturalism in New Zealand: The need for a new paradigm. Aotearoa Ethnic Network Journal1(1): 33–7.
43.
Statistics New Zealand2006. 2006 Census of population and dwellings: National summary. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.
ThomasDElyR. 1996. Making differences matter: a new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review74(5): 79–90.
47.
ThomasDElyR. 2001. Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly46: 229–73.
48.
ThomasRRJr. 1990. From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review68: 107–17.
van KnippenbergDSchippersM. 2007. Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology58: 515–41.
51.
WarrPCookJWallT. 1979. Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. Journal of Occupational Psychology52: 129–48.
52.
WilliamsKYO'ReillyCA. 1998. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior20: 77–140.
53.
WrenchJ. 2007. Diversity management and discrimination: Immigrants and ethnic minorities in the EU. Burlington, UK: Ashgate.
