Abstract
Objective:
This paper aims to provide an overview of evidence-based psychological treatments for trichotillomania.
Conclusions:
Advances in the understanding of the phenomenology of trichotillomania has led to the augmentation of behavioural treatments with dialectical behaviour therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy. Further studies of treatment component efficacy and cognitive behavioural models are required.
Trichotillomania (TTM) is an obsessive compulsive-related disorder that is characterised by repeated removal of hair, typically from the scalp, eyebrows and eyelashes, resulting in hair loss.1,2 TTM is associated with low self-esteem, high distress, and significant social and vocational impairment.2,3 It is a chronic, relapsing and treatment-resistant disorder. 4 The difficulty in treating TTM is, in part, a result of limited awareness of effective treatment options. In a survey of 501 US psychologists and physicians, 72% of respondents believed that pharmacotherapies are effective treatments for TTM. 5 By contrast, expert consensus and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the most empirically validated treatment for TTM.6–8 Dissemination of treatment advances is a critical challenge in improving outcomes for TTM. 9 This paper provides an overview of evidence-based psychological treatments for TTM while highlighting areas in need of further study.
Habit reversal therapy
The specific style of behaviour therapy utilised in CBT trials is habit reversal therapy (HRT).7,8 When HRT was developed, TTM was conceptualised as a “nervous habit” occurring beyond the individual’s awareness. 10 Behavioural models of TTM posit that hairpulling is reinforced via conditioning processes, and HRT aims to inhibit or modify the factors that have become associated with hairpulling (Box 1).11,12 Despite positive outcomes using standard HRT in uncontrolled trials and case studies, 4 only two RCTs have been completed. Azrin and colleagues reported that single-session HRT (n=18) reduced self-reported hairpulling episodes by 99% compared with a reduction of 58% following 1 day of self-directed negative practice (n=15). 10 At 22-month follow-up, participants who completed a single HRT session and received telephone support for up to 4 months post-treatment maintained an 87% reduction in hairpulling episodes. More recently, van Minnen and colleagues compared six sessions of standard HRT over 12 weeks with fluoxetine treatment (60mg/day) or a waiting list. 13 HRT resulted in a significantly greater reduction of self-reported TTM severity. However, at 2-year follow-up, only nine of 24 participants had maintained a 50% or more reduction in symptom severity, while two participants reported increased symptom severity from baseline. 14
TTM: trichotillomania
Developments in treatment augmentation
Although HRT is an important component of TTM treatment, relapse rates suggest it is insufficient. Phenomenological research over the past decade has demonstrated that TTM is not simply characterised by habitual, “automatic” hairpulling. A second, “focused” style of hairpulling is intentionally performed in TTM to regulate negative internal experiences (i.e. emotions, cognitions, sensations). 15 Although less than 0.01% of individuals with TTM pull hair exclusively in either an automatic or focused manner, the distinction has generated speculation that HRT may be most effective for automatic hairpulling while emotion regulation and cognitive interventions may be most effective for focused hairpulling. 15 As such, HRT is increasingly being augmented with emotion regulation and cognitive interventions to simultaneously target both automatic and focused hairpulling styles.
Dialectical behaviour therapy
There is growing evidence that emotion dysregulation is implicated in TTM. Hairpulling is consistently associated with decreases in negative emotions like boredom, sadness and anxiety, and associated with increases in calmness.3,16 Furthermore, pre-treatment depression symptoms may moderate long-term TTM symptom outcomes. 14 This has led to the augmentation of HRT with dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) 17 to improve the emotion regulation and distress tolerance skills of individuals with TTM. The DBT-enhanced HRT protocol developed by Keuthen and colleagues18–20 consists of 11 weekly treatment sessions followed by four “booster” sessions held at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-treatment (see Box 2).
DBT: dialectical behaviour therapy; HRT: habit reversal therapy; TTM: trichotillomania
Expanding on an earlier pilot treatment trial,18,19 an RCT 20 found the DBT/HRT intervention (n=20) resulted in significantly greater reductions to self- and clinician-rated TTM severity and impairment compared with a minimal attention control condition (n=18). There were significantly greater pre- to post-treatment improvements in emotion regulation for the DBT group. Five participants receiving the DBT intervention were completely abstinent from hairpulling at the end of treatment, compared with one in the control group, with improvements generally maintained at 6-month follow-up.
Acceptance and commitment therapy
Experiential avoidance is the avoidance of unpleasant internal experiences through engaging in maladaptive behaviours. 21 Highly experientially avoidant participants with TTM had more frequent and intense hairpulling urges, felt less ability to control those urges, and experienced greater hairpulling-related distress. 22 Although high versus low experiential avoidance did not differentiate between actual hairpulling, these findings led researchers to trial acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) 21 as an augmentation to HRT. Mindfulness, values work, and “defusion” from the literal interpretation of thoughts are some of the core components of ACT-enhanced HRT for TTM (Box 3).23–25
Treatment structure of ACT-enhanced HRT for TTM (Woods and colleagues) 24
ACT: acceptance and commitment therapy; HRT: habit reversal therapy; TTM: trichotillomania
ACT for TTM has been trialled in one RCT, which comprised 10 sessions over 12 weeks. 24 Compared with a waitlist condition (n=13), the ACT intervention (n=12) produced significantly greater reductions in self- and clinician-rated TTM severity/impairment from pre- to post-treatment. There were also significantly greater pre- to post-treatment reductions in depression, anxiety and experiential avoidance among the ACT group. At 3-month follow-up, self-rated TTM severity had significantly increased from post-treatment; however, there were no significant changes in clinician-rated impairment or the average daily number of hairs pulled.
Critique and future research
Both DBT- and ACT-enhanced HRT reduce acute TTM symptoms, with preliminary support for maintenance of reductions at 319,20,24 and 6 months post-treatment.19,20 Meta-analyses demonstrate that these “mood-enhanced” HRT trials result in a significantly larger treatment effect than standard HRT or CBT trials. 8 Correlations between TTM symptom reduction and changes in emotion dysregulation and experiential avoidance suggest that these processes are possible change mechanisms, although specific studies are needed. 24
Lacking in research is an understanding of the effectiveness of traditional CBT for TTM. Two RCTs have trialled cognitive restructuring as part of CBT protocols, but have small sample sizes and lack follow-up data.26,27 Investigations regarding the content and role of cognitions in TTM are limited. These issues, combined with behavioural models that underestimate the role of cognitions and beliefs in TTM without strong evidence 11 have resulted in this potentially important element of TTM phenomenology being ignored. However, emerging research has identified several classes of cognitions that are important in TTM, including negative self-beliefs, perfectionism and desire for control, and a preference to avoid expressing negative emotion. 28 When CBT has addressed maladaptive cognitions specific to TTM and repetitive behaviours (including perfectionism and self-critical statements), significant acute and long-term symptom reductions have been reported.29,30 There is a strong need for this research to be replicated under controlled conditions and with larger sample sizes of TTM-only patients.
Conclusion
Phenomenological research in the last decade has revealed that TTM is a more complex disorder than previously believed. New understandings of the relationship between emotion regulation processes and TTM severity3,16,22 combined with unacceptable relapse rates following behavioural treatment 14 suggest that HRT does not target the complete phenomenological picture of antecedent and maintaining factors. This has culminated in the augmentation of HRT with interventions that address emotion regulation and experiential avoidance, namely, DBT18–20 and ACT.23–25 RCTs of both interventions have promising outcomes; however, replications and treatment component sequencing studies are necessary. Lastly, CBT protocols that explicitly target cognitions of empirically demonstrated relevance to TTM have also shown some promise.29,30 To ensure the efficacy of psychological treatments for TTM, continued development and evaluation of comprehensive cognitive behavioural models will be essential.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
This paper was presented at the International Anxiety Disorders Society Conference which was held in Melbourne in November 2014.
