Ashour, A.S. (1973a) "The contingency model of leadership effectiveness: an evaluation." Org. Behavior and Human Performance9: 339-355.
2.
——— (1973b) "Further discussion of Fiedler's contingency model of leadership effectiveness." Org. Behavior and Human Performance9: 269-376.
3.
Chemers, M.M. and R.W. Rice (1973) "A theoretical and empirical examination of Fiedler's contingency model of leadership effectiveness," in J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson (eds.) Contingency Approaches to Leadership. Carbondale : Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
4.
Chemers, M.M. and G.J. Skrzypek (1972) "Experimental test of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness." J. of Personality and Social Psychology24: 173-177.
5.
Fiedler, R.E. (1977) "A reply and a rejoinder on Schriesheim and Kerr's comments about the contingency theory of leadership effectiveness," in J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson (eds.) Leadership: The Cutting Edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press .
6.
——— ( 1973) "The contingency model—a reply to Ashour ." Org. Behavior and Human Performance9: 356-368.
7.
——— (1971) "Validation and extension of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness : a review of empirical findings." Psych. Bull.76: 128-146.
8.
——— ( 1967) A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Hall, J. (1971) "Decisions, decisions." Psychology Today5: 51-54.
10.
Posthuma, A.B. (1970) Normative Data on the Least Preferred Coworker Scale (LPC) and the Group Atmosphere (GA. Office of Naval Research Technology Report No. 70-8. Seattle: Organizational Research Group, University of Washington.
11.
Rice, R.W. (1978) "Construct validity of the least preferred co-worker scale." Psych. Bull.85: 1199-1237.
12.
Schriesheim, C.A. and S. Kerr (1977a) "Theories and measures of leadership: a critical appraisal of current and future directions," in J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson (eds.) Leadership: The Cutting Edge. Carbondale : Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
13.
——— (1977b) "R. I. P. L. P. C. (a reply to Fiedler," in J. G. Hunt and L. L. Larson (eds.) Leadership: The Cutting Edge. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press .
14.
Schwab, D.P. and L.L. Cummings (1970) "Theories of performance and satisfaction : a review ." Industrial Relations9: 408-430.
15.
Shaw, M.E. (1963) Scaling Group Tasks: A Method for Dimensional Analysis. Tech. Report 1. Gainesville: University of Florida.
16.
Shiflett, S.C. (1972) The Contingency Model: Some Implications of its Statistical and Methodological Properties. U.S. Army Medical Research Laboratory Report No. 966. Fort Knox, Kentucky .
17.
Smith, P.C., L.M. Kendall, and C.L. Hulin (1969) The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement . Chicago: Rand McNally.
18.
Steiner, E.D. (1972) Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press.
19.
Vecchio, R.P. (1977) "An empirical examination of the validity of Fiedler's model of leadership effectiveness." Org. Behavior and Human Performance19: 180-206.
20.
Yukl, G. (1971) "Toward a behavioral theory of leadership." Org. Behavior and Human Performance6: 414-440.