Cross-cultural simulation to advance student inquiry

Abstract

This article reviews how and why the authors have used the cross-cultural simulation BAFA BAFA in a 1styear social sciences inquiry course on social identity. The article discusses modifications made to Shirts’s original script for BAFA BAFA, how the authors conduct the postsimulation debriefing, key aspects of the student-written reflection of the simulation, and research results on how students perceive and rate BAFA BAFA relative to their learning. Students enrolled in the course find the simulation to be important to various aspects of their learning, including helping them to understand cultural diversity. This is particularly true for students who score highly on measures of deep learning, that is, the ability to connect course content with meanings in other situations and experiences in reflective ways.

Keywords

BAFA BAFA cross-cultural debriefing identity inquiry reflection simulation games

References

Bogo, M. ,& Vayda, E. (1986). The practice of field instruction in social work theory and practice. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

Crookall, D. , & Saunders, D. (1989). Towards an integration of communication and simulation. In D. Crookall & D. Saunders (Eds.), Communication and simulation: From two fields to one theme(pp. 3-29). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Cuneo, C. , Inglis, S. , Justice, C. , Miller, S. , Rice, J. , Sammon., S. , et al. (2000). Turning the page: Student learning through a collaboratively-taught social science inquiry course. Retrieved August 24, 2004, from http://www.learnlink.mcmaster.ca/inquiry/ssc_inquiry.htm

Entwistle, N. J. , & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

Entwistle, N. J. ,& Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321-342.

Fowler, S. M. (1994). Two decades of using simulation games for cross-cultural training. Simulation& Gaming, 25, 464-476.

Horn, R. E. , & Cleaves, A. (Eds.). (1973). The guide to simulations/games for education and training(4th ed.). Cranford, NJ: Didactic Systems.

Jones, K. (1998). Hidden damage to facilitators and participants. Simulation & Gaming, 29, 165-172.

Justice, C. , Warry, W. , Cuneo, C. , Inglis, S. , Miller, S. , Rice, J. , et al. (2001). A grammar for inquiry: Linking goals and methods in a collaboratively taught social sciences inquiry course. The Alan Blizzard Award Guelph, Canada: Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.

10.

Laurillard, D. (1979). The processes of student learning. Higher Education, 8, 395-409.

11.

Marton, F. ,& Saljo, R. (1976). Onqualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.

12.

McKeachie, W. J. (1994). Teaching tip. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

13.

Petranek, C. F. (1989). Knowing oneself: A symbolic interactionist view of simulation. In D. Crookall & D. Saunders (Eds.), Communication and simulation: From two fields to one theme(pp. 109-116). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

14.

Petranek, C. F. (2000). Written debriefing: The next vital step in learning with simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 31, 108-111.

15.

Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, 411-427.

16.

Shirts, R. G. (1977). BAFA BAFA: A cross culture simulation. Director’s guide. Del Mar, CA: Simile II.

17.

Suransky, L. (1973). International relations games and simulations: An evaluation. In R. E. Horn & A. Cleaves (Eds.), The guide to simulations/games for education and training(4th ed., pp. 162-176). Cranford, NJ: Didactic Systems.

18.

Ting-Toomey, S. (1989). Intergroup communication and simulation in low-and high-context cultures. In D. Crookall & D. Saunders (Eds.), Communication and simulation: From two fields to one theme(pp. 169-176). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

19.

Wenzler, I. ,& Chartier, D. (1999). Why do we bother with games and simulations: An organizational learning perspective. Simulation & Gaming, 30, 375-384.