People experiencing disability and chronic disease often feel powerless, relinquishing medical control to “more knowledgeable” professionals. This article presents qualitative and quantitative results from three individual patients experiencing an emerging procedure called Recovery Preference Exploration (RPE). To inspire greater patient involvement, self-direction, and individual choice, we instructed participants to create an imagined recovery path, exposing recovery preferences while learning about clinical rehabilitation concepts. Results uncovered important values and feelings about disability, providing a richer context for patient evaluation and treatment goal modification. Applying mixed methods, RPE is presented as an explanatory process for quantifying recovery preferences in a way that stimulates rich narrative of how people see different types of disabilities. RPE shows promise for increasing depth of discussions among patients, family, and clinicians. RPE may promote greater quality of life through patient empowerment by directed learning, increased communication, and enhanced self-knowledge.
Aharony, I., & Strasser, S. (1993). Patient satisfaction: What we know about and what we still need to explore. Medical Care Review, 50(1), 49-79.
2.
Baker, L.M. (1998). Sense making in multiple sclerosis: The information needs of people during an acute exacerbation. Qualitative Health Research, 8(1), 106-120.
3.
Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Bergeson, S.C., & Dean, J.D. (2006). A systems approach to patient-centered care. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 296(23), 2848-2851.
5.
Charmaz, K. (1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health and Illness, 5(2), 168-195.
6.
Creswell, J.W., Fetters, M.D., & Ivankova, N.V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Annals ofFamily Medicine, 2(1), 7-12.
7.
Ditunno, P.L., Patrick, M., Stineman, M., Morganti, B., Townson, A.F., & Ditunno, J.F. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in preference for recovery of mobility among spinal cord injury rehabilitation professionals. Spinal Cord, 44(9), 567-575.
8.
Docherty, D., & McColl, M.A. (2003). Illness stories: Themes emerging through narrative. Social Work in Health Care, 37(1), 19-39.
9.
Dunn, D.S., & Dougherty, S.B. (2005). Prospects for a positive psychology of rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(3), 305-311.
10.
Eisenberg, B. (1997). Customer service in healthcare: A new era. Hospital & Health Services Administration, 42(1), 17-31.
11.
Elander, J., & Barry, T. (2003). Analgesic use and pain coping among patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia, 9(2), 202-213.
12.
Fonteyn, M., Kuipers, B., & Grobe, S. (1993). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4), 430-441.
13.
Freas, D., & Stineman, M. (2005). An analysis of recovery preference: A tool to transcend professional bias. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
Gans, B.M. (2006). Is PM&R teetering on the precipice of a dark age?Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(3), 315-316.
Grosset, K.A., & Grosset, D.G. (2005). Patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction in Parkinson's disease: Effect on therapy decisions and quality of life. Movement Disorders, 20(5), 616-619.
17.
Holman, H., & Lorig, K. (2000). Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. BMJ, 320(7234), 526-527. Retrieved November 7, 2005, from http://www.bmj.com
18.
Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives. Suffering, healing and the human condition. New York: Basic Books.
19.
London Department of Health. (2001). The expert patient: A new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
Mishler, E.G. (1984). The discourse of medicine. The dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21.
National Institutes of Health, Office of Behavioral and Social Science Research. (1999). Qualitative methods in health research: Opportunities and considerations in application and review, organized by the NIH Culture and Qualitative Research Interest Group. Retrieved October 18, 2004, from http://www.csr.nih.gov/archives/reviewcriteria.htm
22.
Seligman, M.E., Steen, T.A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.
23.
Sox, H.C., Blatt, M.A., Higgins, M.C., & Marton, K.I. (1988). Medical decision making. Boston : Butterworth.
24.
Stewart, D., & Mickunas, A. (1990). Exploring phenomenology: A guide to the field and its literature (2nd ed.). Athens: Ohio University Press.
25.
Stewart, M., Brown, J.B., Weston, W.W.M.I., McWilliam, C.L., & Freeman, T.R. (2003). Patient-covered medicine transforming the clinical method (2nd ed.). Oxon, UK: Radcliffe.
26.
Stewart, M.A. (1995). Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: A review. Canadian Medical Association Journal , 152(9), 1423-1433.
27.
Stineman, M.G. (2000). Medical humanism and empowerment in medicine. Disability Studies Quarterly, 20(1), 11-16.
28.
Stineman, M.G. (2001). A model of health environmental integration. Top Stroke Rehabilitation, 8(2), 34-45.
29.
Stineman, M.G., Maislin, G., Nosek, M., Fiedler, R., & Granger, C.V. (1998). Comparing consumer and clinician values for alternative functional states: Application of a new feature trade-off consensus building tool. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79(12), 1522-1529.
30.
Stineman, M.G., Ross, R.N., Maislin, G., Marchuk, N., Hijirida, S., & Weiner, M. (2007). Recovery Preference Exploration. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.86(4), 272-281.
31.
Stineman, M.G., Wechsler, B., Ross, R., & Maislin, G. (2003). A method for measuring quality of life through subjective weighting of functional status. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4, Suppl. 2), S15-S22.
32.
Tsay, S.-L., & Li-Oer, H. (2004). Empowerment of patients with end-stage renal disease—A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(1), 59-65.
33.
UB Foundation Activities. (2001). IRF-PAI training manual (Vol. 3). Buffalo, NY: Author.
34.
Ware, N.C., & Kleinman, A. (1992). Culture and somatic experience: The social course of illness in neurasthenia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosomatic Medicine, 54(5), 546-560.
35.
Whitman, N. (1993). A review of constructivism: Understanding and using a relatively new theory. Family Medicine, 25(8), 517-521.
36.
Williams, B. (1994). Patient satisfaction: A valid concept?Social Science & Medicine, 383(4), 509-516.
37.
World Health Organization. (1977). Primary health care. Unpublished manuscript.
