Literature on caregiving identifies gender as a major social policy issue. It highlights caring as grounded in assumptions about women's natural caring role and embedded social expectations and behavioral patterns. This literature has typically employed a universalized notion of "woman." It has left differences between women substantially unexplored. Differences in caring practice between genders have been typically represented as fixed, and the dynamic and fluid dimension of gender has been suppressed. Based on a postmodern reading of accounts of caregiving by 28 New Zealand female and male White caregivers, the article theorizes gender as both unstable and rigid in its everyday manifestations. Gender categories are described as constituted by complex social processes and representations and as crossing sex-speciic boundaries. The article seeks to achieve an analysis of research data that accurately maps the complexities of gender and that begins to explore the processes by which individuals cross gender boundaries.
References
1.
Atkinson, P. (1990). The ethnographic imagination: Textual constructions of reality. London and New York: Routledge.
2.
Barthes, R. (1986). The rustle of language. (pp. 76-79). (Richard Howard, Trans.). New York: Hill & Wang. (Original work published 1984)
3.
Bauman, Z. (1989). Sociological responses to postmodernity. Thesis Eleven, 23, 35-63.
4.
Clifford, J. , & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Connell, R. W. (1991). A thumbnail dipped in tar or: Can we write sociology from the fringe of the world?Meanjin, 50(1), 37-47.
6.
Croft, S. (1986). Women, caring and the recasting of need—a feminist reappraisal. Critical Social Policy, 16, 23-39.
7.
de Lauretis, T. (1987). The technology of gender. In T. de Lauretis, The technology of gender (pp. 1-30). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8.
Finch, J. (1989). Family obligations and social change. Oxford: Polity Press/Blackwell.
9.
Finch, J. , & Groves, D. (1980). Community care and the family: A case for equal opportunities. Journal of Social Policy, 9(4), 487-511.
10.
Finch, J. , & Groves, D. (Eds.). (1983). A labour of love: Women, work and caring. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11.
Fitting, M. , Rabins, P., Lucan, M. J., & Eastham, J. (1986). Caregivers for dementia patients: A comparison of husbands and wives. The Gerontologist, 26, 253-259.
12.
Geertz, C. (1988). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
13.
George, L. , & Gwyther, L. (1986). Caregiver well-being: A multidimensional examination of family caregivers of demented adults. The Gerontologist, 26(3), 253-259.
14.
Green, B. (1983). Knowing the poor: A case-study in textual reality construction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15.
Greene, G. , & Kahn, C. (1985). Feminist scholarship and the social construction of women. In G. Greene, & C. Kahn (Eds.), Making a difference: Feminist literary criticism (pp. 1-36). New York and London: Methuen.
16.
Jack, A. (1987). Families care: Dependent persons and their caregivers. Wellington: Health Services Research and Development Unit.
17.
Johnson, C. , & Catelano, D. (1983). A longitudinal study of family supports to the impaired elderly. The Gerontologist, 23(6), 612-618.
18.
Koopman-Boyden, P. (1990). Social policy: Has there been one? In M. Holland & J. Boston (Eds.), The fourth labour government: Politics and policy in New Zealand (2nd ed.) (pp. 213-231). Auckland: Oxford University Press.
19.
Leitch, V. (1983). Deconstructive criticism: An advanced introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
Lewis, J. , & Meredith, B. (1988). Daughters who care: Daughters caring for mothers at home. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21.
Marsden, D. , & Abrahms, S. (1987). 'Liberators', 'companions', 'intruders', and 'cuckoos in the nest'. In P. Allat, T. Keil, A. Bryman, & B. Bytheway (Eds.), Women and the life cycle: Transitions and turning points (pp. 192-207). London: Macmillan.
22.
Opie, A. (1991). Community care of confused older people in New Zealand: Some policy implications. Mental Health News, 6(2), 2-27.
23.
Opie, A. (1992a). Qualitative research, appropriation of the "other" and empowerment. Feminist Review, 40, 52-69.
24.
Opie, A. (1992b). There's nobody there: Community care of confused older people. Auckland: Oxford University Press; Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
Parker, G. (1985). With due care and attention: A review of research on informal care. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
26.
Scott, J. W. (1988). Gender and the politics of history. New YorkColumbia University Press.
27.
Smith, D. (1990). Texts, facts and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London and Canada: Routledge.
28.
Tronto, J. (1989). Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring? In A. Jaggar & S. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge/feminist reconstruction of being and knowing (pp. 172-187). New Brunswick and London. Rutgers University Press.
29.
Ungerson, C. (1987). Policy is personal: Sex, gender, and informal care. London: Tavistock.
30.
Waerness, K. (1987). On the rationality of caring. In A. S. Sassoon (Ed.), Women and the state: The shifting boundaries of public and private (pp. 207-234). London: Hutchinson.
31.
Zarit, S. , Todd, P., & Zarit, J. (1986). Subjective burdens of husbands and wives as caregivers: A longitudinal study. The Gerontologist, 26(3), 260-267.
