Effects of Personal Control Beliefs: An Explanatory Analysis of Bargaining Outcomes in Intergroup Negotiations

Abstract

A simulated collective bargaining game characterized by face-to-face interaction between five-person bargaining teams was used to investigate the effects of team locus of control on level of aspiration and bargaining outcomes (either strike or settlement). Locus of control was measured using an IE scale developed espe cially for use with persons having business training. Level of aspiration was measured by (a) magnitude of target point and (b) magnitude of resistance point. Results suggest that the more internal a team's personal control beliefs, the more likely it is that the team would not reach a negotiated settlement with its oppo nent. The results are discussed in light of previous findings from bargaining studies.

References

Bigoness, W.G. Effects of locus of control and style of third party intervention upon bargaining behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976 , 61, 305-312.

Deutsch, M. Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: 1962 . Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1962.

Druckman, D. Prenegotiation experience and dyadic conflict resolution in a bargaining situation . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1968, 4, 367-383.

Evans, M.G. The moderating effect of internal versus external control on the relationship between various aspects of job satisfaction. Studies in Personnel Psychology, 1973, 5, 37-45.

Faucheaux, C. , & Moscovici, S. Self-esteem and exploitive behavior in a game against chance and nature . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 1, 83-88.

Goodstadt, B.D. , & Hjelle, L.A. Power to the powerless: Locus of control and the use of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973 , 27, 190-196.

Hamner, W.C. The influence of structural, individual and strategic differences on bargaining outcomes. In D. L. Harnett & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Bargaining behavior: An international study. Houston: Dame Publications, 1980.

Heisler, W.J. A performance correlate of personal control beliefs in an organizational context . Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974 , 59, 505-506.

Lopez-Roig, L. The development of a locus of control scale. Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, 1972.

10.

Mitchell, T.R. , Symser, C.M. , & Weed, S.E. Locus of control: Supervision and work satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 1975, 18, 623-631.

11.

Organ, D.W. , & Greene, C.N. Role ambiguity, locus of control, and work satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59,101-102.

12.

Rotter, J.B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement . Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80 (1, Whole No. 609).

13.

Siegel, S. , & Fouraker, L.F. Bargaining and group decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

14.

Tseng, M.S. Locus of control as a determinant of job proficiency, employability, and training satisfaction of vocational rehabilitation clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1970, 57, 49-54.

15.

Walton, R.E. How to choose between strategies of conflict and collaboration. In L. Porter & B. Mohr (Eds.), Reading book for human relations training . Rosslyn, VA: NTL Institute, 1982 .

16.

Walton, R.E. , & McKersie, T.B. A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

17.

Wilson, W. , & Robinson, C. Selective intergroup bias in both authoritarians and non-authoritarians after playing a modified prisoner's dilemma game. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 27, 1051-1058.