There is a positive relationship between how much we talk about politics and current events and how much we participate in civic activities. However, analytical biases make it difficult to accurately estimate the causal influence of talk on individual behavior. Moreover, existing data sources do not include information on the mechanisms that might explain how individuals translate talk into action. These problems are addressed with new data that were collected through a natural experiment. The results show that civic discussions promote civic participation largely because during such discussions we are recruited to become involved.
Best, Samuel J., Brian Krueger, Clark Hubbard, and Andrew Smith.2001. An assessment of the generalizability of Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review19:131-45.
2.
Brady, Henry.1999. Political participation. In Measures of political attitudes, ed. John P. Robinson, Phillip R. Shaver, and Lawrence S. WrightsmanSan Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
Brady, Henry E., Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Sidney Verba.1999. Prospecting for participants: Rational expectations and the recruitment of political activists. American Political Science Review93:153-68.
4.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes .1960. The American voter. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Campbell, David E., and Christina Wolbrecht.2006. See Jane run: Women politicians as role models for adolescents . Journal of Politics68:233-47.
6.
Couper, Mick P.2000. Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly64:464-94.
7.
Dillman, Don A.2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method . New York: John Wiley.
8.
Downs, Anthony.1957. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
Eliasoph, Nina.1998. Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Gerber, Alan, and Donald Green.2000. The effects of personal canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review94:641-52.
11.
Godwin, R. Kenneth, and Robert Cameron Mitchell.1984. The implications of direct mail for political organizations. Social Science Quarterly65:829-39.
12.
Harris-Lacewell, Melissa Victoria.2004. Barbershops, Bibles, and BET: Everyday talk and black political thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul Allen Beck, Russell J. Dalton, and Jeffrey Levine.1995. Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science39:1025-54.
14.
Huckfeldt, Robert, Ken'ichi Ikeda, and Franz Urban Pappi .2000. Political expertise, interdependent citizens, and the value added problem in democratic politics. Japanese Journal of Political Science1:171-95.
15.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague.1991. Discussant effects on vote choice: Intimacy, structure, and interdependence. Journal of Politics53:122-58.
16.
———. 1995. Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Kenny, Christopher.1992. Political participation and effects for the social environment . American Journal of Political Science36:259-67.
18.
———. 1994. The microenvironment of attitude change. Journal of Politics56:715-28.
19.
Lake, R.L., and Robert Huckfeldt.1998. Social capital, social networks, and political participation . Political Psychology19:567-83.
20.
Laver, Michael.2005. Book review of The social logic of politics. Perspectives on Politics3:933-34.
21.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet.1968. The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election . 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Levine, Jeffrey, 2002. Choosing alone? A return to the network basis of political choice. Manuscript.
23.
McClurg, S.D.2003. Social networks and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly56:449-64.
24.
———. 2004. Indirect mobilization: The social consequences of party contacts in an election campaign. American Politics Research32:406-43.
25.
Mutz, Diana C.2002. The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science46:838-55.
26.
Popkin, Samuel.1995. Information shortcuts and the reasoning voter. In Information, participation, and choice, ed. Bernard Grofman. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
27.
Rosenstone, Steven, and John Mark Hansen .1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
28.
University of Wisconsin—Madison Division of University Housing.2004. University housing application process. http://www.housing.wisc.edu (accessed January 17, 2007).
29.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady.1995. Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Walsh, Katherine Cramer.2004. Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Zhang, Yin.2000. Using the Internet for survey research: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science51:57-68.
32.
Zuckerman, Alan S.2004. Returning to the social logic of politics. In The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior, ed. Alan S. Zuckerman.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
