While the election of racial/ethnic minority lawmakers has diversified American legislative institutions, scholars continue to find evidence of racial backlash in public policy decisions. This seems to undermine the Madisonian conception of the ability of minority interests to offset majoritarian resentment through representation and raises the question, Can minority group representatives influence policy decisions in majoritarian institutions? Using evidence from the American states, this study shows that the fastest-growing ethnic minority group, Latinos, do benefit from descriptive representation, as increases in Latino representation and legislative incorporation offset the negative effects of Latino population size on social welfare policy.
Barrilleaux, Charles, Thomas Holbrook, and Laura Langer.2002. Electoral competition, legislative balance, and American state welfare policy. American Journal of Political Science46 (2): 415-27.
2.
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz .1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89 (3): 634-47.
3.
———. 1996. Nuisance vs. substance: Specifying and estimating time-series cross-section models. Political Analysis6:1-36.
4.
Blalock, Hubert M., Jr. 1967. Toward a theory of minority-group relations . New York: John Wiley.
5.
Branton, Regina.2007. Latino attitudes toward various areas of public policy: The importance of acculturation. Political Research Quarterly60 (2): 293-303.
6.
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Kerry L. Haynie .1999. Agenda setting and legislative success in state legislatures: The effects of gender and race. Journal of Politics61 (3): 658-79.
7.
Brown, Robert D.1995. Party cleavages and welfare effort in the American states . American Political Science Review89 (1): 23-33.
8.
Browning, Rufus P., Dale R. Marshall, and David H. Tabb.1984. Protest is not enough: The struggle of blacks and Hispanics for equality in urban politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Bullock, Charles S. I.1992. Minorities in state legislatures. In Changing patterns in state legislative careers, ed. Gary F. Moncrief and Joel A. Thompso, 39-58. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10.
Council of State Governments (CSG). n.d. State leadership directory: legislative leadership, committees, and staff. 1984-2002. Lexington, KY: CSG.
11.
Davidson, Chandler, and George Korbel.1981. At-large elections and minority-group representation: A re-examination of historical and contemporary evidence. Journal of Politics43 (4): 982-1005.
12.
Deering, Christopher J., and Steven S. Smith .1990. Committees in Congress. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
13.
Dovi, Suzanne.2002. Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, black or Latino do?American Political Science Review94 (4): 745-54.
14.
Engstrom, Richard, and Michael McDonald .1981. The election of blacks to city councils: Clarifying the impact of electoral arrangements on the seats/population relationship. American Political Science Review75 (2): 344-54.
15.
———. 1986. The effect of at-large versus district elections on racial representation in U.S. municipalities. In Electoral laws and their political consequences, ed. Bernard Grofman and Arend Lijphart.New York: Agathon Press.
16.
———. 1987. The election of blacks to southern city councils: The dominant impact of electoral arrangements. In Blacks in southern politics, ed. Laurence Moreland, Robert Steed, and Tod Baker , 245-58. New York: Praeger.
17.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver.1993. Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in the American states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Fellowes, Matthew C., and Gretchen Rowe.2004. Politics and the new American welfare states. American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 362-73.
19.
Fraga, Luis R.1992. Latino political incorporation and the Voting Rights Act . In Controversies in minority voting: The Voting Rights Act in perspective, ed. Bernard Grofman and Chandler Davidson, 278-82. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
20.
Fraga, Luis R., Kenneth J. Meier, and Robert E. England .1986. Hispanic Americans and educational policy: Limits to equal access. Journal of Politics48 (4):850-76.
21.
Francis, Wayne L.1989. The legislative committee game: A comparative analysis of the fifty states. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
22.
Fording, Richard.1997. The conditional effect of violence as a political tactic: Mass insurgency, electoral context and welfare generosity. American Journal of Political Science41 (1): 1-29.
23.
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media and the politics of antipoverty policy . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Giles, Michael W., and Arthur Evans.1986. The power approach to intergroup hostility . Journal of Conflict Resolution30 (3): 469-86.
25.
Grofman, Bernard, and Lisa Handley.1989. Black representation: Making sense of electoral geography at different levels of government. Legislative Studies Quarterly14 (2): 265-79.
26.
Guiner, Lani.1992. Voting rights and democratic theory—Where do we go from here? In Controversies in minority voting: The Voting Rights Act in perspective, ed. Bernard Grofman and Candler Davidson, 283-91. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
27.
Haider-Markel, Donald P., Alana Querze, and Kara Lindaman.2007. Lose, win, or draw? A reexamination of direct democracy and minority rights. Political Research Quarterly60 (2): 304-14.
28.
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003 . Congressional enactments of race-gender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review97 (4): 529-50.
29.
Haynie, Kerry L.2001. African American legislators in the American states. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
Hedge, David, James Button, and Mary Spear.1996. Accounting for the quality of black legislative life: The view from the states. American Journal of Political Science40 (1): 82-98.
31.
Hero, Rodney E.1998. Faces of inequality: Social diversity and American politics . New York: Oxford University Press .
32.
Hero, Rodney E., and Caroline J. Tolbert .1995. Latinos and substantive representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, indirect or nonexistent?American Journal of Political Science39 (3): 640-52.
33.
Hochschild, Jennifer L.1995. Facing up to the American dream: Race, class and the soul of the nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Holbrook, Thomas A., and Emily Van Dunk.1993. Electoral competition in the American states. American Political Science Review87 (4): 955-62.
35.
Huntington, Samuel P.2004. Who are we: The Challenges to America's national identity . New York: Simon & Schuster .
36.
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Marcia L. Whicker .1994. Legislative leadership in the American states. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37.
Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.2004. Table 2: Black elected officials 1999. http://jointcenter.org/DB/table/graphs/heo_99.pdf (accessed October 25, 2004).
38.
Karnig, Albert K., and Susan Welch.1982. Electoral structure and black representation on city councils . Social Science Quarterly63 (1): 99-114.
39.
Keele, Luke, and Nathan J. Kelly .2005. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. June 21. http://polmeth.wustl.edu/workingpapers.php?year=2005 (accessed July 6, 2005).
40.
Key, V.O.1949. Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Knopf.
41.
Klinkner, Philip A., and Rogers M. Smith .1999. The unsteady march: The rise and decline of racial equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Leal, David L., Valarie Martinez-Ebers, and Kenneth J. Meier .2004. The politics of Latino education: The biases of at-large elections. Journal of Politics66 (4): 1124-1244.
43.
Lower-Basch, Elizabeth.2000. TANF leavers, applicants, and caseload studies: Preliminary analysis of racial differences in caseload trends and leaver outcomes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/leavers99/race.htm (accessed July 6, 2006).
44.
Lublin, David.1997. The paradox of representation: Racial gerrymandering and minority interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent yes . Journal of Politics61 (3): 628-57.
46.
Meier, Kenneth J., Eric Gonzalez Juenke, Robert Wrinkle, and J.L. Polinard.2005. Structural choices and representational biases: The post-election color of representation. American Journal of Political Science49 (4): 758-68.
47.
Meier, Kenneth J., and Joseph Jr. Stewart .1991. The politics of Hispanic education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48.
Mindiola, Tatcho, Jr., and Armando Gutierrez .1988. Chicanos and the legislative process: Reality and illusion in the politics of change. In Latinos and the political system, ed. F. C. Garcia, 349-62. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
49.
National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO). n.d. National roster of Hispanic elected officials. 1984-. Washington, DC: NALEO Education Fund.
50.
Nelson, Albert J.1991. Emerging influentials in state legislatures. New York: Praeger.
51.
Owens, Chris T.2005. Black substantive representation in state legislatures from 1971-1999. Social Science Quarterly84 (5): 779-91.
52.
Pachon, Harry, and Louis DeSipio.1992. Latino elected officials in the 1990s . PS: Political Science and Politics25 (2): 212-17.
53.
Peterson, Paul.1981. City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
Pitkin, Hanna.1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley : University of California Press.
55.
Preuhs, Robert R.2005. Descriptive representation, legislative leadership, and direct democracy: Latino influence on English only laws in the states, 1984-2002 . State Politics and Policy Quarterly5 (3): 203-24.
56.
———. 2006. The conditional effects of minority descriptive representation: Black legislators and policy influence in the American states. Journal of Politics68 (3): 585-99.
57.
Radcliff, Benjamin, and Martin Saiz.1995. Race, turnout, and public policy in the American states . Political Research Quarterly48 (4): 775-94.
58.
Rocha, Rene.2007. Black-brown coalitions in local school board elections . Political Research Quarterly60 (2): 315-27.
59.
Santoro, Wayne A.1999. Conventional politics takes center stage: The Latino struggle against English-only laws. Social Forces77 (3): 887-909.
60.
Soss, Joe, Sanford F. Schram, Thomas P. Vartanian, and Erin O'Brien.2001. Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science45 (2): 378-95.
61.
Swain, Carol M.1995. Black faces, black interests: The representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Tatalovich, Raymond.1995. Nativism reborn? The official English language movement and the American states. Lexington: The University of Kentucky Press.
63.
Tate, Katherine.2001. African Americans and their representation in Congress: Does race matter?Legislative Studies Quarterly26:623-38.
64.
U.S. Census Bureau.2004a. Voting and registration in the election of November 1984. July 22. http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/voting/p20-405.html (accessed October 26, 2004).
65.
———. 2004b. Voting and registration in the election of November 2000 . February 24. http://www.census.gov/population/www./socdemo/voting/p20-542.html (accessed October 26, 2004).
66.
Wildavsky, Aaron.1988. The new politics of the budgetary process. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
67.
Wright, Gerald C.2004. Zip file of the CBS/New York Times national polls, ideology party identification, 1976-2003 [Stata 7.0 format]. http://mypage.iu.edu/∼wright1/ (accessed June 30, 2006).
68.
Zogby, John, and Rebecca Wittman .2004. Hispanic perspectives. Prepared for the National Council of La Raza, June 2004. www.nclr.org (accessed October 25,2004).
