A simulation study compared 36 young adult drivers’ task completion time, eye behavior, and driving performance while dialing a flip-phone with tactile pushbuttons and an iPhone which provides a touch screen interface. Participants who often use a traditional manual button phone completed the dialing task faster when using the flip-phone compared to touch screen users using the iPhone. Females using the flip phone had the highest percentage of time spent with eyes on the road. Females were also less likely to exhibit glances greater than 2 seconds in duration with both phone types and particularly with the flip-phone. Some advantages may exist in a traditional tactile manual interface in terms of the percentage of time drivers kept their eyes on the road.
References
1.
AngellL.AuflickJ.AustriaP. A.KochharD.TijerinaL.BieverW.. (2006). Driver Workload Metrics Task 2 Final Report. Washington, DC: U.S. DOT National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
2.
BasacikD.ReedN.RobbinsR. (2012). Smartphone use while driving: a simulator study. Berkshire, UK: Transport Research Laboratory.
3.
ColletC.GuillotA.PetitC. (2010a). Phoning while driving I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies. Ergonomics, 53(5), 589-601.
4.
ColletC.GuillotA.PetitC. (2010b). Phoning while driving II: a reivew of driving conditions. Ergonomics, 53(3), 602-616.
5.
DrewsF. A.YazdaniH.GodfreyC. N.CooperJ. M.StrayerD. L. (2009). Text messaging during simulated driving. Human Factors, 51(5), 762-770.
6.
EvansL. (1991). Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
7.
HoffmanJ. D.LeeJ. D.McGeheeD. V.MaciasM.GellatlyA. W. (2005). Visual sampling of in-vehicle text messages: effects of number of lines, page presentation, and message controlTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1937, 22-30.
8.
HorreyW. J.LeschM. (2008). Assessing the awareness of performance decrements in distracted drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 675-682.
9.
HorreyW. J.WickensC. D. (2006). Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48(1), 196-205.
10.
HoskingS. G.YoungK. L.ReganM. A. (2009). The effects of text messaging on young drivers. Human Factors, 51(4), 582-592.
11.
ISO 15007-1. (2002). Road vehicles - Measurement of driver visual behaviour with respect to transport information and control systems - Part 1: Definitions and parameters. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.
12.
ISO 15007-2. (2001). Road vehicles - Measurement of driver visual behaviour with respect to transport information and control systems - Part 2: Equipment and procedures. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.
13.
LeeW.ChengB. (2010). Comparison of portable and onboard navigation system for the effects in real driving. Safety Science, 48(10), 1421-1426.
14.
RanneyT. A. (1994). Models of driving behavior: A review of their evolution. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 26(6), 733-750.
15.
RanneyT. A.BaldwinG. H. S.ParmerE.MartinJ.MazzaeE. N. (2011). Distraction effects of manual number and text entry while driving. Washington, DC: U.S. DOT National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
16.
RanneyT. A.HarblukJ. L.NoyY. I. (2005). Effects of voice technology on test track driving performance: implications for driver distraction. Human Factors, 47(2), 439-454.
17.
RedelmeierD. A.TibshiraniR. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7), 453-458.
18.
ReedM. P.GreenP. A. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialing task. Ergonomics, 42(8), 1015-1037.
19.
ReimerB.MehlerB. (2011). The impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers: a field study and simulation validation. Ergonomics, 54(10), 932-942.
20.
SamuelS.PollatsekA.FisherD. L. (2011). Texting while driving: Evaluation of glance distributions for frequent/infrequent texters and keypad/touchpad texters. Proceedings of the Sixth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Lake Tahoe, CA, 424-432.
21.
SchreinerC. S. (2006). The effect of phone interface and dialing method on simulated driving performance and user preference. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2359-2363.
22.
ViolantiJ. M. (1997). Cellular phones and traffic accidents. Public Health, 111, 423-428.
23.
ViolantiJ. M. (1998). Cellular phones and fatal traffic collisions. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(4), 519-524.
24.
ViolantiJ. M.MarshallJ. R. (1996). Cellular phone and traffic accidents: an epidemiological approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28(2), 265-270.
25.
WalshS. P.WhiteK. M.HydeM. K.WatsonB. (2008). Dialling and driving: Factors influencing intentions to use a mobile phone while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(6), 1893-1900.
26.
WangY.ReimerB.MehlerB.LammersV.D’AmbrosioL. A.CoughlinJ. F. (2010). The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: a comparison with field testing. Ergonomics53(3), 404-420.
27.
WilsonF. A.StimpsonJ. P. (2010). Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2213-2219.
