Long-Term Benefits and Limitations of Combined Antianginal Drug Therapy in Elderly Patients with Symptomatic Chronic Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Chronic angina is a common and disabling disorder in the elderly. Combined antianginal drug treatment represents the mainstay of therapy in this population. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the effect of this strategy on long-term outcome in the elderly.

Methods: To assess the long-term effect of combined antianginal drug therapy in elderly individuals, we performed a long-term follow-up analysis of all 148 patients of the Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in Elderly (TIME) patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease assigned to an optimized medical therapy strategy. Angina severity, measures of quality of life (QOL), and survival were assessed after a median of 3.7 (0.1-6.9) years.

Results: At baseline, patients were 79.8 ± 3.5 years old with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class angina 3.0 ± 0.7 despite the use of 2.4 ± 0.6 antianginal drugs. Although antianginal drugs were increased to 2.8 ± 0.9 (P < .01), 63 (43%) patients needed revascularization for refractory symptoms during the first year of observation (REVASC). At baseline, REVASC patients had more frequently CCS class 4 angina (37% vs 20%, P < 0.05) but reported less prior heart failure (5% vs 20%, P < 0.01), fewer prior cerebral events (3% vs 13%, P < .05) and a lower rate of two or more comorbidities (10% vs 33%, P < .01) than patients on continued drug therapy (DRUG). At long-term follow-up, angina severity was still higher in DRUG compared to REVASC patients (CCS class, 1.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.0 ± 1.4, P < .05) despite more antianginal drugs (2.1 ± 1.1 vs 1.5 ± 1.0, P < .01), whereas measures of QOL had improved similarly in both groups. In addition, long-term mortality was significantly higher in DRUG than in REVASC patients (38% vs 13%, P < .01).

Conclusion: Combined antianginal drug therapy successfully relieved symptoms in most elderly patients with chronic angina but failed to do so in 43%. Patients who needed revascularization for refractory symptoms reported less angina, despite lower drug use during long-term follow-up and had a better long-term survival. Thus, the widely used strategy to increase antianginal drug therapy in elderly patients instead of evaluating them for revascularization should be reconsidered.