Blum. H.L. (1974) Planning for Health. New York : Human Sciences Press.
2.
Brady. I. and B. Isaac (1975) A Reader in Cultural Change, Vols. I and II. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Campbell. D. (1971) "Reforms as experiments." Urban Affairs Q.7: 133-171.
4.
Davis, H.R. (1973) "Change and innovation," in S. Feldman (ed.) Administration and Mental Health. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
5.
Dimaggio, P. and M. Useem (1979) "Decentralized applied research: factors affecting the use of audience research by arts organizations." J. of Applied Bchavioral Science15: 79-94.
6.
Fairweather. G.W., D.H. Sanders. and L.G. Tornatzsky (1974) Creating Change in Mental Health Organizations. New York: Pergamon.
7.
Geertz. C. (1975) "Common sense as a cultural system." Antioch Rev.33.
8.
——— ( 1966) "Religion as a cuitural system," in M. Banton (ed.) Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. London: Tavistock.
9.
Glaser. E. et al. (1976) Putting Knowledge to Use: A Distilliation of the Literature Regarding Knowledge Transfer and Change. Los Angeles: Human Interaction Research Institute and the Mental Health Services Development Branch, NIMH.
10.
Holzner, B. (1968) Reality Construction in Society. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
11.
——— and J.H. Marx (1979) Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society. Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
12.
Jones. C.O. (1974) Doing before knowing: concept development in political research." Amer. J. of Political Science (February): 215-228.
13.
Koontz, V.L. (1976) "Determinants of individuals' levels of knowledge and attitudes towards and decisions regarding a health innovation in Maine." Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
14.
Lin, N. and G. Zaltman (1973) "Dimensions of innovations," in G. Zaltman (ed.) Processes and Phenomena of Social ScienceNew York: John Wiley.
15.
Lindblom, C.E. and D.K. Cohen (1979) Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
16.
Lippitt, G.L. (1973) Visualizing Change: Model Building and the Change Process, Fairfax, VA: NTL- Learning Resources Corporation.
17.
Mitroff, I. et al. (1979) "Selected factors affecting research use ." Research in progress.
18.
Provus, M. (1971) Discrepancy Evaluation. Berkeley. CA: McCutchan.
19.
Rogers, E.M. (1973) "What are the opportunities and limitations in the linking of research with use?" Presented at the International Conference on Making Population Family Planning Research Useful, Honolulu.
20.
Rogers. E.M. ( 1976) "New product adoption and diffusion." J. of Consumer Research2: 290-301.
21.
——— and F. SHOEMAKER (1971) The Communication of Innovations . New York: Free Press.
22.
Rothman. J. (1976) Promoting Innovation and Change in Organizations and Communities: A Planning Manual. New York: John Wiley.
23.
——— ( 1974) Planning and Organizing for Social Change: Action Principles from Social Science Research. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
24.
Scriven, M. (1973) "Goal-free evaluation." in E. R. House (ed.) School Evaluation: Politics and Process . Berkeley. CA: McCutchan.
25.
——— (1972) "Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation." Evaluation Comment2: 1-8.
26.
Weiss. C. and M.J. Bucuvalas (1978) "Truth tests and utility tests: decision-makers frames of reference for social science research." New York : Columbia University Center for Social Sciences.
27.
Zaltman, G. and R. Duncan (1977) Strategies for Planned Change. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
28.
Zaltman, G., D. Florio. and L. Sikorski (1977) Dynamic Educational ChangeNew York: Free Press.