CassidyJ. (1981). Inquiry reading for the gifted. The Reading Teacher, 35, 17–21.
9.
CecilN. (1999). Primary reading attitude survey. In CecilN. (Ed.), Striking a balance—Positive balances for early literacy.Scottsdale, AZ: Holcomb Hathaway Publishers.
10.
ChallJ.ConardW. (1991). Should textbooks challenge students? The case for easier or harder textbooks.New York: Teachers College Press.
11.
CherryL. (2000). The great kapok tree: A tale of the Amazon Rain Forest.Stillwater, MN: Voyager Publishing.
12.
CollinsN.AiexN. (1995). Gifted readers and reading instruction.Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading English and Communication. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED379637).
13.
ComoL.MandinachE. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88–108.
14.
DenoS.MarstonD. (1987). Test of Oral Reading Fluency.Minneapolis, MN: Children's Educational Services.
15.
DooleyC. (1993). The challenge: Meeting the needs of gifted readers. Reading Teacher, 46, 546–551.
16.
DukeN. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of international texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
17.
FoxM. (2004). When Little Bear bragged. In FoxM. (Ed.), Little Bear at work and play.Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing.
18.
GentryM. (1999). Promoting student achievement and exemplary classroom practices through cluster grouping: A research-based alternative to heterogeneous elementary classrooms.Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
19.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (2001). DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency. Retrieved June 3, 2005 from http://dibels.uoregon.edu.
20.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A.DillS. (2002). DIBELS Retell Fluency. Retrieved June 3, 2005 from http://dibels.uoregon.edu.
21.
HalstedJ. W. (1994). Some of my best friends are books: Guiding gifted readers from preschool to high school (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
22.
HansenV. R.RobenhagenO. (1993). Abdullah's Genuine Indonesian Curry Powder: About early readers and differentiated teaching.Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
23.
HooverH.DunbarS.FrisbieD. (2001). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills.Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
24.
Iran-NejadA. (1990). Active and dynamic self-regulation of learning processes. Review of Educational Research, 60, 573–602.
25.
JacksonN. E. (1991). Are early readers gifted?Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
26.
JohansenH. (2005). The duck and the owl.Boston: David R. Godine Publishing.
27.
JohnstonT. (2000). The barn owls.Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge Publishing.
KingoreB. (2001). Gifted kids, gifted characters, and great books. Gifted Child Today, 24(1), 30–32.
30.
KulikJ. (1992). Analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives.Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
31.
KulikJ.KulikC. (1996). Ability grouping and gifted students. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
LakesK. D.HoytW. T. (2003). The response to challenge scale (RCS): Technical manual. (Available from Kimberley Lakes, Children's Hospital of Orange County, 455 S. Main Street, Orange, CA92868).
33.
LefevreJ.SenechalM. (1999, March 2). The relations among home-literacy factors, language and early-literacy skills, and reading acquisition. In EvansM. A. (Chair), Home literacy practices: Precursors, dimensions and outcomes in the early school years. Symposium presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
34.
McIntoshM. E. (1982). A historical look at gifted education as it relates to reading programs for the gifted. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED244472).
35.
McKennaM.KearD. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 43, 626–639.
36.
McLeodE. (2002). Lessons from Mother Earth.Vancouver, BC: Douglas & McIntyre.
37.
MillsJ. R.JacksonN. E. (1990). Predictive significance of early giftedness: The case of young gifted reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 410–419.
ReisS.BurnsD.RenzulliJ. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high-ability students.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
40.
ReisS. M.RenzulliJ. S. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
41.
RenzulliJ. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
42.
RenzulliJ. S. (1988). A decade of dialogue on the three-ring conception of giftedness. Roeper Review, 11, 18–25.
43.
RenzulliJ. S. (1998). The three-ring conception of giftedness. In BaumS.ReisS. M.MaxfieldL. R. (Eds.), Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students (pp. 1–25). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
RhemJ. (1999). Pygmalion in the classroom. National Teaching and Learning Forum, 8(2), 1–4.
46.
RichertE. S. (1997). Excellence with equity in identification and programming. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 75–88). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
47.
RogersK. (1998). Using current research to make “good” decisions about grouping. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 38–46.
48.
RohrkemperM.ComoL. (1988). Success and failure on classroom tasks: Adaptive learning and classroom teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 297–326.
49.
SchnurJ. O.LowreyM. A. (1986). Some characteristics of young gifted readers. Early Child Development & Care, 26, 191–198.
50.
StarkoA. J.SchackG. D. (1989). Perceived need, teacher efficacy, and teaching strategies for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 118–122.
51.
SwansonD. (1997). Welcome to the world of owls.New York: Walrus Books.
52.
TolanS. S. (1985, November/December). Stuck in another dimension: The exceptionally gifted child in school. G/C/T41(4), 22–26.
53.
TomlinsonC. A. (1999). The Differentiated Classroom.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
54.
TomlinsonC.KaplanS.RenzulliJ.PurcellJ.LeppienJ.BurnsD. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
55.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ.BrownE. F. (2001). An analysis of gifted education curriculum models. In KarnesF. A.BeanS. M. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted.Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
56.
VosslamberA. (2002). Gifted readers: Who are they and how can they be served in the classroom?Gifted Child Today, 25(2), 14–21.
57.
WangM. C.PalincsarA. S. (1989) Teaching students to assume an active role in their learning. In ReynoldsM. C. (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher, (pp. 71–84). Oxford: Pergamon.
58.
PetersL. Westberg (2003). Earthshake: Poems from the ground up.New York: Greenwillow.
59.
WildsmithB. (2000). The owl and the woodpecker.England: Oxford University Press.
60.
WinebrennerS.DevlinB. (2001). Cluster grouping of gifted students: How to provide fulltime services on a part-time budget: Update 2001.Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451663).