Abstract
Using the 5E inquiry model to plan learning experiences in literacy and mathematics provides opportunities for centering students’ thinking and reasoning and engaging students in the productive struggle. This shift in pedagogical approach necessitates planning with student inquiry in mind. As the teacher’s role shifts from provider of information to facilitator of students’ learning experiences, students demonstrate their learning progress through the five phases of this inquiry-based approach, Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate. Throughout the phases of a 5E inquiry lesson, there are multiple opportunities for students to apply, share, and discuss their thinking. Gauging student progress in each phase allows teachers to plan follow-up experiences that provide additional challenge and continued opportunities for growth.
Keywords
Planning and teaching a lesson with the 5E model is a departure from more traditional, teacher-centered methods of content delivery in literacy and mathematics.”
During a recent research project, teachers used an inquiry-based lesson plan framework for designing lessons that focused on supporting grades K-3 teachers in recognizing and responding to signs of advanced academic potential. In this project, teachers implemented inquiry-based lessons in literacy and mathematics with all learners and observed how students engaged with the work. As they developed these lessons, teachers anticipated possible responses they might see from students and planned for specific ways to provide additional challenge or support based on student response. Evidence from classroom observations demonstrated increased use of several important discourse practices (e.g., teacher and student linking of ideas in discussion), and teachers reported high levels of student responsiveness and indicators of advanced potential from a diverse range of learners (Little & O’Brien, 2025).
The 5E Instructional Model (Bybee et al., 2006) was the inquiry-based framework selected for this project. While originally designed to guide the development of inquiry-based science lessons, this approach can be used across content areas to provide opportunities for students to interact deeply with content as they develop conceptual understandings. Such an approach provides the context for students to demonstrate their learning progress and needs and for teachers to interpret and respond accordingly, including providing additional challenge and scaffolding.
Some students demonstrate clear signs of advanced learning and a need for additional challenge early in school, but for other young children advanced academic potential may be more hidden (VanTassel-Baska & Stambaugh, 2007). Therefore, support for all children to have access to learning experiences that will uncover and promote their talent development is necessary (Horn et al., 2021; Olszewski-Kubilius & Clarenbach, 2012). When learning experiences invite behaviors indicative of high potential, teachers can engage in “talent spotting” efforts with all their learners and adjust follow-up instruction to support appropriate levels of challenge (Robinson et al., 2018).
Inquiry-based lessons can be useful contexts for inviting all students to demonstrate behaviors indicating high potential. Such lessons provide multiple opportunities for student response to challenging tasks that might be open-ended or slightly ambiguous, or might include multiple reasonable answers. When designed to engage all students while also including space for students to show different levels of complexity and understanding, inquiry-based lessons offer teachers opportunities to observe and respond to a wide range of learners through differentiation. Such responses occur through application of discourse practices to challenge and support student thinking as well as extension questions and activities tailored to individual needs. This article provides an example of 5E lessons that were created in mathematics and literacy to show how teachers can shift their focus to fostering student-centered learning, encouraging inquiry, and promoting deeper engagement with concepts through hands-on exploration and critical thinking.
Overview of the 5E Model
The 5E model provides a framework for designing and implementing inquiry-based lessons to offer opportunities for students to develop ideas and questions about a concept based on their experiences and further investigate these ideas. As the name would suggest, there are five phases of a lesson designed with the 5E model: Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate (see Figure 1). Phases of the 5E model.
In the first phase, Engage, “[t]he main point is that the students are puzzled and thinking about content related to the learning outcomes of the instructional sequence” (Bybee, 2014, p. 11). By presenting a hook related to the focus concept of the lesson, teachers engage students in opportunities to discuss what they already know about it and/or develop questions related to it. These ideas and questions lead to the Explore phase, where students begin to investigate a problem or question related to the concepts. Students work collaboratively on the exploration, which often involves “concrete, hands-on experiences where students express their current conceptions and demonstrate their abilities as they try to clarify puzzling elements of the Engage phase” (Bybee, 2014, p. 11).
In the Explain phase, “the teacher introduces scientific or technological concepts briefly and explicitly” (Bybee, 2014, p. 11) and based on ideas generated by the students through their explorations and investigations. This allows the teacher to provide specific information to help focus and refine students’ ideas and for students to make connections between their initial ideas and the information provided. The students have the chance to then deepen their understanding, when in the Elaborate phase “students are engaged in learning experiences that extend, expand, and enrich the concepts and abilities developed in the prior phases” (Bybee, 2014, p. 11). One way to provide these experiences is to introduce a task related to the concept that is more complex. This task also can be differentiated to provide more support for or further extend students’ thinking about the concept.
While some informal assessment takes place throughout the phases of an inquiry-based lesson, the Evaluation phase is when teachers may formatively assess students’ learning. This may occur as students share their ideas through written and/or oral means. Teachers then can provide students with feedback and help students to continue to refine their ideas about the concept.
Shifting Towards Planning for Inquiry in Mathematics and Literacy
While inquiry-based lessons in science are fairly common, mathematics and literacy lessons are more often taught using a direct instruction approach. In most direct instruction lessons, teachers present information at the outset and provide students with opportunities to incorporate the ideas into existing schema through practice. In contrast, in an inquiry-based approach, teachers design learning opportunities to facilitate students’ creation of meaning based on their experiences as they move through the lesson—which is an approach that can be applied across content areas. Additionally, it is valuable for students to engage in explorations and investigations of concepts, develop connections, and engage in in-depth thinking to build their own understanding around concepts in both mathematics and literacy (Beach & Cleovoulou, 2014; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2014).
This shift in pedagogical approach, in mathematics and literacy lessons, necessitates planning with inquiry in mind. The teacher’s role shifts from the provider of information to facilitator of students’ learning experiences. To adjust lesson planning in the areas of mathematics and literacy to this inquiry approach, teachers should start with identifying the intended learning outcome, consider ways to center student thinking, identify areas of the lesson in which students may demonstrate advanced understanding and areas of struggle, and consider ways to further students’ thinking and understanding when they do. In addition to these planning efforts, teachers also have to think about the ways in which the format of the lesson is different from what they and students are used to and consider how to respond to that within the context of the lesson.
Starting with the Learning Outcome
Although there is not one right sequence of steps to design a lesson with the 5E model, identifying the intended learning outcome, often a grade level standard, should be the starting place. This learning outcome provides direction for the overall lesson as teachers use it to guide their thinking to plan each phase. Teachers can also use it as the basis for developing an open-ended, slightly ambiguous, or appropriately complex task for students to investigate during the lesson. This task may provide a useful opportunity for teachers to observe the different levels of thinking students bring to their work.
Centering Student Thinking
Throughout the phases of a 5E inquiry lesson, there should be multiple opportunities for students to apply, share, and discuss their thinking. Teachers must purposely develop tasks and questions that have multiple reasonable responses and that require students to engage in higher levels of thinking—thus, the questions should require more than recall, and the tasks should not be possible for students to complete through rote application of a practiced skill. At different stages of the lesson, students have opportunities to generate new ideas in response to a question, prompt or task; make decisions about how to approach a problem or situation; and apply new information, background knowledge, or personal experiences to their learning.
Essential to student-centered discourse in an inquiry context is that teachers plan how to help students think about concepts before telling them what to think. This requires developing purposeful, open-ended questions that will engage higher-level thinking skills and allow for a range of student responses related to the lesson’s concepts. To plan the facilitation of this student-centered discourse, teachers should intentionally organize the classroom space so students can see and hear one another during discussions and develop classroom routines for prompting students to expand on their thinking and evaluate the reasoning of others, such as the “Say More” and “Agree/Disagree and why” talk moves (Chapin et al., 2013).
Identifying Opportunities to Observe Student Understanding
Typically, students are asked to demonstrate their understanding of the topic at the end of a lesson. While this allows them to express what they have learned about the concepts, it may limit teachers’ opportunity to capitalize on students’ understandings during the lesson. An inquiry-based approach encourages ongoing opportunities for students to share understandings and for teachers to respond and differentiate throughout the learning experience. For example, in the lesson design process, teachers should anticipate moments where students may demonstrate higher-level thinking skills and/or high-potential behaviors, as well as moments when misconceptions and potential struggle may arise. Intentionally anticipating these instances provides the teacher the chance to plan ahead for ways to support and provide additional challenge or extension.
While engaged in learning experiences, students may demonstrate indicators of a range of high-potential behaviors, such as perceptive, strategic, communicative, resourceful, creative, curious, leadership, and resilient behaviors. These high-potential behaviors are connected to students’ ability to learn, apply knowledge, show creativity, and demonstrate motivation (Horn, 2015; Shaklee, 2002) and therefore can indicate a need for challenge or extension. A critical part of this discussion is recognizing that the behaviors may look different across students. Teachers can think about what they might expect from students based on what they know of students’ background and recognize when the students are showing behaviors that are exceptional based on that understanding (Horn et al., 2021).
Planning Ways to Respond to Student Understanding
Once opportunities for observing student understanding are identified during the lesson planning process, teachers should plan how they would respond when they notice that students are finding a task too easy or have advanced understanding of the content, in addition to when students are struggling in ways that are unproductive (e.g., showing frustration). The goal here is for teachers to plan to respond to students’ understanding in ways that enable all students to engage in productive struggle (NCTM, 2014). Practically, this may look like teachers writing strategies and questions directly into lesson plans that represent these types of responses to students’ thinking. This helps with maintaining high expectations and providing appropriate levels of challenge and support.
To prepare for responding to students who have demonstrated advanced understanding and/or the task is too easy for them, teachers should plan ways to re-engage students with productive struggle by increasing challenge. Differentiation strategies include providing higher-level or more complex questions, problems, or examples for students to explore, investigate, and discuss. In mathematics, for example, if students are exploring ways to create different representations of a number (e.g., ten frames, base-ten blocks), teachers could ask the students to evaluate their representations to develop one that they think none of their classmates would use. This would encourage flexibility and originality in thinking. Similarly, in literacy, students who demonstrate that they are able to make strong text-to-self connections about a text the class has read could be asked to extrapolate beyond themselves to connect the text to other texts the class has read, or to situations happening in the world. These connections allow students to demonstrate perceptiveness by looking for commonalities among themes and plots across multiple texts to better understand how authors use these literary elements to build meaning.
Grade 1 Literacy Lesson Example.
Lesson Examples
The following are brief descriptions of grade 1 literacy and mathematics inquiry-based lessons that were developed by teachers as part of a research study using the 5E model. The teachers attended professional learning workshops, worked collaboratively in grade level teams to develop the lessons, implemented the lessons with their students, and revised the lessons based on feedback gathered across multiple classrooms and schools. Throughout the planning and revising of each of the lessons, the teachers in the study also considered moments in the lesson at which students may demonstrate behaviors indicating high-potential. They wrote reflections on each lesson after implementing it, and then shared these reflections with one another to support their lesson revisions. The examples below represent only two examples of the lessons developed by the teachers throughout the study. All of the lessons developed throughout the project are available here: https://lift.uconn.edu/lessons/.
Sample Literacy Lesson
In the lesson “What Love is to Me,” first graders explore the concept of “Love” based on their own perspective, the perspective of their peers, and also by identifying words and phrases from the text, Love (de la Peña, 2018), that contribute to their understanding. Students refine their definition of love throughout the lesson, thinking about different points of view and gathering information from various sources to connect to their own ideas. The tasks in this lesson are aligned to the Common Core ELA Literacy Standard RL.1.4—“Identify words and phrases in stories or poems that suggest feelings or appeal to the senses.”
Using the 5E Model in this lesson allows students to rethink and refine their definition and helps teachers determine which students are grasping the concept at a more advanced level. During the Explore and Explain phases, for example, a teacher might notice that students are finding relevant details from the words and pictures to describe and elaborate on how the author shows love, and recognizing the ways in which peers’ definitions of love are similar to and different from their own. One teacher reflected, The kids enjoyed [sharing] their view point of love. The abstract idea of love is difficult for them to understand but some children were able to say love is kindness or friendship, not just playing with my dog. One student said, “Treat people how you want to be treated.” Love means happy. Those children were my deeper thinkers. The students were able to talk about the feelings they saw in the book. (Teacher 48, Lesson Reflection, Nov. 19, 2021)
Grade 1 Mathematics Lesson Example.
Sample Mathematics Lesson
This first-grade lesson engages students in exploring place value and the understanding that the value of each digit is determined by its place in a number. They play a game that requires them to think strategically about place value to reach a target number. The lesson aligns with the Common Core Mathematics Standard 1. NBT.B.2—“Understand that the two digits of a two-digit number represent amounts of tens and ones” (NGA & CCSSO, 2010).
In this sample mathematics lesson, students may demonstrate indicators of high potential while planning and making decisions. Some students may recognize patterns and key details as they represent numbers in different ways in the Explore phase, thus showing perceptive thinking and potential readiness for additional challenge and complexity. During the Elaborate phase, students may show strategic thinking in how they reason and make decisions before rolling the dice in the game. When students demonstrate these behaviors, the teacher can differentiate the follow-up task by increasing the complexity of the game rules, as described above. This increased complexity of the game responds to the students’ needs by further engaging students in thinking strategically about the content because they now have to make multiple decisions on each turn, re-evaluate the situation after each roll, and consider the likelihood of rolling a 0–9 or 10–90 number that will result in losing a turn.
Following the development of this lesson, four of the teachers in the study taught the lesson with all of the first-grade students in their classes and reflected on the high-potential behaviors, types of thinking, and the productive struggle that students displayed or engaged in. One teacher mentioned that while playing the game, students were using more decision making skills as they saw the consequences of their decisions. For example, at first most wanted to use the tens dice until they noticed that for a lot of their target numbers they had a greater chance of going over their target number if they rolled using that dice (Teacher 30, Lesson Reflection, June 3, 2022)
Multiple teachers commented that having to make a choice about which die to use to reach the target number on each turn caused some “great thinking” and “productive struggle” for students. Teachers reported following up with these students by asking them to further explain their thinking to their partners and to increase the complexity of the game by introducing three-digit numbers and playing the game with a 200-chart.
Conclusion
The primary goal of the project was for teachers to elicit evidence of and respond to high-potential thinking and behaviors in their students’ through teaching the inquiry-based lessons they designed with all of their students. Presenting these tasks for all students, rather than only those perceived or identified as advanced, allowed high-potential behaviors to emerge from a variety of students. Additionally, the focus of the project was to provide engaging, challenging opportunities for all students to wrestle with ambiguity and complexity and to push their thinking in different directions. Further, these learning experiences presented advanced learners with tasks that encouraged them to struggle in productive ways and to have to think through questions without quick and straightforward answers.
Overall, planning and teaching a lesson with the 5E model is a departure from more traditional, teacher-centered methods of content delivery in literacy and mathematics. The model provides opportunities for teachers to focus on many possible pathways of student response and student questions, to invite and accept more examples of student thinking, and to provide instruction in a way that is flexible and responsive to students bringing a wide range of ideas. Thus, teachers must be intentional in planning to center students’ thinking and ideas during learning experiences, to “acknowledge that struggle is an important and natural part of learning” (Warshauer, 2015, p. 392), and to respond in ways that extend or support students’ thinking.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported under the Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program [PR/Award Number S206A170030], as administered by the OESE, U.S. Department of Education.
