AstinH. S.Sex differences in mathematical and scientific precocity. In StanleyJ. C.KeatingD. P.FoxL. H. (Eds.), Mathematical Talent: Discovery, description and development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.
2.
CasserlyP. L.Factors affecting female participation in advanced placement programs in mathematics, chemistry, and physics. In FoxL. H.BrodyL.TobinD. (Eds.), Women and the Mathematical Mystique.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
3.
DearmanN.B.PliskoV.W.The condition of education.National Center for Education Statistics, 1979.
4.
DweckC. S.RepucciN. D.Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 109–116.
5.
ErnestJ.Is mathematics a sexist discipline? In FoxL. H.BrodyL.TobinD. (Eds.), Women and the Mathematical Mystique.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
6.
FoxL.H.Interest correlates to differential achievement of gifted students in mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1978, 1 (2), 24–36.
7.
FoxL.H.TobinD.BrodyL. SexRole Socialization and Achievement in Mathematics. In WittigMichele A.PetersenAnne C. (Eds.), Determinants of Sex-Related Differences in Cognitive Functioning.New York: Academic Press; 1977, 1979.
8.
FoxL.H.BrodyL.TobinD.Women and the Mathematical Mystique.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
9.
KeatingD.P. (Ed.). Intellectual talent: Research and development.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.
10.
SolanoC.H.Teacher and pupil stereotypes of gifted boys and girls. Talents and Gifts, 1977, 19 (4), 4.
11.
StanleyJ. C.KeatingD.P.FoxL.H. (Eds.). Mathematical Talent: Discovery, description, and development.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.
12.
StanleyJ. C.GeorgeW. C.SolanoC. H.(Eds.). The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.