Increasing the number of suspects who give true confessions of sexual abuse serves justice and reduces the burden of the criminal justice process on child victims. With data from four communities, this study examined confession rates and predictors of confession of child sexual abuse over the course of criminal investigations (final N = 282). Overall, 30% of suspects confessed partially or fully to the crime. This rate was consistent across the communities and is very similar to the rates of suspect confession of child sexual abuse found by previous research, although lower than that from a study focused on a community with a vigorous practice of polygraph testing. In a multivariate analysis, confession was more likely when suspects were younger and when more evidence of abuse was available, particularly child disclosure and corroborative evidence. These results suggest the difficulty of obtaining confession but also the value of methods that facilitate child disclosure and seek corroborative evidence, for increasing the odds of confession.
Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1980). Confessions in crown court trials (Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure Research Study No. 5). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
2.
Bradshaw, T.L., & Marks, A.E. ( 1990). Beyond a reasonable doubt: Factors that influence the legal disposition of child sexual abuses cases. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 276-285.
Cross, T.P., De Vos, E., & Whitcomb, D. ( 1994). Prosecution of child sexual abuse: Which cases are accepted ? Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 663-677.
5.
Cross, T.P., Jones, L.J., Walsh, W., Simone, M., Kolko, D.J., Szczepanski, J., Lippert-Luikart, T., et al. (2008). The multi-site evaluation of children’s advocacy centers: Overview of the results and implications for practice. OJJDP Crimes Against Children Series. Bulletin.
6.
Cross, T.P., & Saxe, L. ( 2001). Polygraph testing and sexual abuse: The lure of the magic lasso. Child Maltreatment, 6, 195-206.
7.
Cross, T.P., Walsh, W., Simone, M., & Jones, L.M. ( 2003). Prosecution of child abuse: A meta-analysis of rates of criminal justice decisions. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse , 4, 323-340.
8.
Deslauriers-Varin, N. & St-Yves, M. (July 2006). An empirical investigation of offenders’ decision to confess their crime during police interrogation. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Investigative Interviewing , Portsmouth. U.K.
9.
Deslauriers-Varin, N. & St-Yves , M., & Lussier, P. ( 2009 ). Confessing their crime: Factors influencing the offender’s decision to confess during police interrogation. DOI: 10.1080/07418820903218966.
10.
Edinburgh, L., Saewyc, E., & Levitt, C. ( 2008). Caring for young adolescent sexual abuse victims in a hospital-based children’s advocacy center. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1119-1126.
11.
Everson, M.D., Hunter, W.M., Runyon, D.K., Edelsohn, G.A., & Coulter, M.L. ( 1989). Maternal support following disclosure of incest. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59, 197-207.
12.
Faller, K.C. ( 1997). The polygraph, its use in cases of alleged sexual abuse: An exploratory study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 993-1008.
13.
Faller, K.C. ( 2010). Polygraph magic. In K. M. Staller & K. C. Faller (Eds.), Seeking justice in child sexual abuse: Shifting burdens and sharing responsibilities (pp. 141-165). New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
Faller, K.C., Birdsall, W.C., Henry, J., Vandervort, F., & Silverschanz, P. (2001). What makes sex suspects confess? An exploratory study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse , 10, 31-49.
15.
Faller, K.C., & Henry, J. ( 2000). Child sexual abuse: A case study in community collaboration . Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1215-1225.
16.
Gray, E. ( 1993). Unequal justice: The prosecution of child sexual abuse . New York: The Free Press.
17.
Gudjonsson, G.H. ( 2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. A handbook . Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18.
Gudjonsson, G.H., & Sigurdsson, J.F. (1999). The Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire-Revised (GCQ-R). Factor structure and its relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 953-968.
19.
Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S.A. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 31-45.
20.
Kassin, S. ( 2008). Confession evidence: Commonsense myths and misconceptions . Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1309-1322.
21.
Kassin, S.M., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-62.
22.
Lanning, K.V. ( 2002). Criminal investigation of sexual victimization of children . In J. Myers, L. Berliner, J. Briere, C. Hendrix, C. Jenny & T. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (2nd ed., pp. 1-582). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
Leiken, L.S. ( 1970). Police interrogation in Colorado: The implementation of Miranda. Denver Law Journal, 1, 1-53.
24.
Leo, R.A. ( 1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86, 266-302.
25.
Leo, R.A., & White, W.S. ( 1999). Adapting to Miranda: Modern interrogators’ strategies for dealing with the obstacles posed by Miranda. Minnesota Law Review, 84, 397-472.
26.
Lippert, T., Cross, T.P., Jones, L., & Walsh, W. ( 2009). Telling interviewers about sexual abuse: Predictors of child disclosure at forensic interviews. Child Maltreatment , 14, 100-113.
27.
Medford, S., Gudjonsson, G.H., & Pearse, J. ( 2003). The efficacy of the appropriate adult safeguard during police interviewing. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 8, 253-266.
28.
Miller, A., & Rubin, D. ( 2008). The contribution of children’s advocacy centers to felony prosecutions of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 12-18.
29.
Moston, S., & Fisher, M. ( 2007). Perceptions of coercion in the questioning of criminal suspects. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 4, 85-95.
30.
Moston, S., Stephenson, G.M., & Williamson, T.M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23-40.
31.
National Children’s Alliance. (n.d.). History of national children’s alliance. Retrieved on July 20, 2009, from http://www.nationalchildrensalliance.org/index.php?s=35
32.
National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education . Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
33.
Pearse, J., Gudjonsson, G.H., Clare, I.C.H., & Rutter, S. ( 1998). Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: Predicting the likelihood of a confession. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 1-21.
34.
Simone, M., Cross, T., Jones, L., & Walsh, W. ( 2005). Children’s advocacy centers: Understanding the impact of a phenomenon. In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. Giacomoni (Eds.), Victimization of children and youth: Patterns of abuse, response strategies (pp.22-1-22-24). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute, Inc.
35.
Smith, B.E., & Goretsky-Elstein, S. (1993). The prosecution of child sexual and physical abuse cases. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
36.
Staller, K. M. & Faller, K. C. (Eds.). (2010). Seeking justice in child sexual abuse: Shifting burdens and sharing responsibilities. New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
St-Yves, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2009). The psychology of suspects’ decision-making during interrogation. In R. Bull, T. Valentine & T. Williamson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 1-15). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
38.
Veith, V.I. ( 1999). When a child stands alone: The search for corroborating evidence. American Prosecutors Research Institute, 12, 1-4. Retrieved on April 27, 2007, from http://www.ndaa-apri.org/apri/
39.
Walsh, W.A., Cross, T.P., Jones, L.M., & Lippert, T. ( 2008). Prosecuting child sexual abuse: The importance of evidence type. Crime & Delinquency, DOI: 10.1177/0011128708320484.
40.
Walsh, W., Jones, L., & Cross, T.P. ( 2003). Children’s advocacy centers: One philosophy, many models. APSAC Advisor, 15, 3-7.
