Abstract
As political division and polarization continually increases in the United States, civic knowledge faces decline. Journalism education provides a potential remedy for these democracy-endangering harms by imparting valuable instruction regarding civics and the role of the media in society. However, with no standardization in the country, individual educators and school districts largely must develop their own curricula. Luckily, student media associations provide support and leadership to student media programs, which is articulated through their mission statements. Filling a gap in the existing research, this study conducted a thematic analysis and found discursive leadership within the mission statements of such associations.
Keywords
Civic knowledge is a key component of a civic culture (Dahlgren, 2002). However, nearly a quarter of Americans cannot name a branch of government (Annenberg Public Policy Center, 2019, 2021). This is especially problematic in a time when three-quarters of the American population do not trust the federal government (Pew Research Center, 2021) and polarization divides the country (Darr et al., 2018, 2021; Padgett et al., 2019).
Of course, understanding how the government works is key to a functioning democracy (e.g., Bohman & Rehg, 1997; Fitzgerald et al., 2016; Habermas, 1994), but civic knowledge is not limited to understanding the branches of government. It includes being media literate (Gray, 2005) and being an informed citizen (e.g., Carrion, 2018; Gerosa et al., 2021; Grabe & Myrick, 2016). Journalism education exposes students to these concepts by delivering important instruction concerning critical thinking, research, media literacy, civics, writing, First Amendment rights, and technology, among other topics (Blom & Davenport, 2012; Bobkowski & Cavanah, 2019; Bockino, 2017; Dvorak et al., 1994; Glick, 2017; Klos, 2001; Lewis, 2020; Sindik, 2021). Despite this, high school journalism programs around the country lack formalized standardization. The Common Core standards provide some guidance (Dailey, 2016), and educator licensure tests “measure knowledge and competencies important for safe and effective beginning practice as a teacher of journalism” (Praxis, 2021, p. 3). However, curricular decisions are up to local districts and educators.
Accordingly, without a formalized national and standard curriculum geared toward media instruction, journalism educators can rely on national, regional, and state student media associations (SMAs) for leadership and guidance regarding what curricular elements should be included in a journalism classroom as support for civic learning. One way these organizations provide leadership is through the discourse or wording of their mission statements, which exist as touchstones for what support they can offer. However, scant research has been conducted in this arena. Therefore, with the purpose of filling this gap in the literature, this study investigated the discursive leadership of U.S.-based SMAs by analyzing their mission statements using thematic analysis (TA) from a constructionism theoretical perspective. Through this, an understanding was gained concerning how these organizations articulate their support for journalism education and work to foster civic knowledge in a democratic society through discursive leadership. This study is thus vitally important because mission statements of SMAs can influence the way educators provide journalism education.
Review of Theory and Literature
To begin, this study used constructionism as its theoretical lens. This perspective views reality and knowledge as socially created via interactions with others and various media in given contexts by connecting, expressing, and reshaping ideas as they relate to individual experiences (Ackermann, 2001; Burr, 2015; Pass, 2004). This theory has roots in the work of Mead and Schubert (1934), who used symbolic interactionism to suggest identities are created through the use of language and perspective in interaction with others. Berger and Luckmann (1966) built on this and suggested ideas became truth through the externalizing of thoughts via storytelling either in writing or orally. This process of defining reality is what allows it to have meaning within a social context (Keaton & Bodie, 2011), which helps create knowledge. As Castor (2007) argued, “social reality is created, maintained, and negotiated through the interactions and discursive practices of social actors” (p. 112). Coming from this standpoint, the following literature review considers research in journalism education, mission statements, and discursive leadership.
Journalism Education
Journalism education provides unique opportunities for students. First and foremost, it provides hands-on, project-based learning (Dailey, 2016; Squires & Schriner, 2009). Through this, students learn writing skills (Kohnen, 2013; Zhang et al., 2019), along with leadership, critical thinking, and media literacy skills (Fabrizi & Ford, 2014; Horn & Veermans, 2019; Phelps, 2018). While producing various media products (Bobkowski et al., 2012; Goodman et al., 2011), the students get to practice their skills, which guided the first research question:
Furthermore, research shows students participating in journalism programs engage more both civically and with the news than those who do not participate in student media (Bobkowski et al., 2012; Bobkowski & Miller, 2016; Clark & Monserrate, 2011). Cybart-Persenaire and Literat (2018) found, doing journalism provides students a way to participate in an aspect of society they may not have access to otherwise. In addition, journalism education teaches students about their rights, specifically their First Amendment rights because journalism programs give students hands-on experience with the law (Nicolini & Filak, 2022; Trager & Dickerson, 1980). Also, high school journalism programs teach civics with a focus on the process of civic engagement (Clark & Monserrate, 2008). To that end, Kennamer (1987) suggested journalism programs provide a phase of education in which political activity is initiated, which led to the second research question:
Mission Statements
Mission statements are “symbolic artifacts” used to signal philosophical values and goals (Morphew & Hartley, 2006, p. 466). They express the philosophy of a corporation or business to both internal and external stakeholders (Swales & Rogers, 1995). Commonly, mission statements accomplish this by describing the organization’s purpose and vision for the future (Fairhurst et al., 1997). As such, research concerning mission statements has in some cases been associated with the business realm (e.g., David et al., 2014; Peyrefitte & David, 2006).
Of course, mission statements are used in a variety of settings. They can be a key component of demonstrating how an entity aligns with societal norms (Anderson & Jamison, 2015) as they represent organizational identity. In addition, the mission statement also serves as a strategic tool used to formulate and evaluate business activities (Cady et al., 2011; Kemp & Dwyer, 2003).
Alegre et al. (2018) suggested certain components needed to be included for a mission statement to be successful, which aligned with Pearce and Fred (1987) who that found that the most financially successful Fortune 500 companies created mission statements covering ideas of corporate philosophy, how the company viewed itself, how the company wished to be viewed by the public, who the target customers and market were, what the primary products and services being offered were, the geographic area being covered by the company, the technologies supporting the operation, and how the company intended to survive and thrive into the future. Interestingly, though, Desmidt et al. (2011) suggested simply including such elements does not mean the mission statement will be effective, and, even if it is, research suggests no clear answer to which component is most important.
Also, the mission statements create and manage the meaning of an organization (Fairhurst et al., 1997). For example, colleges and universities have mission statements that “typically embody components related to teaching, service, and scholarship to fulfill expectancies associated with the institutions” (Opt, 2016, p. 67). Mission statements also play a role in journalism education programs by articulating emphasis areas such as professional connections and citizen preparation (Christ & Hynes, 1997). Importantly, they also can provide an argument for media programs to exist (Salkin, 2022). Therefore, the mission statements of SMAs can provide leadership through the discourse used.
Discursive Leadership
Discursive leadership frames leadership as socially constructed and considers its social, cultural, and linguistic attributes (Fairhurst, 2007). Fairhurst (2008) developed the concept of discursive leadership as a communication-focused alternative to viewing leadership, which was previously viewed as a cognitive activity. This means the language used as part of social interactions is the focus of discursive leadership (Fairhurst & Connaughton, 2014). Consequently, the language used within the discourse develops shared meaning and constructs the social reality (Fairhurst & Connaughton, 2014; Fairhurst & Uhl-Bien, 2012; Ospina, 2016). Social interactions, and thus discourse, exist when multiple participants bring information, opinions, thoughts, and beliefs to a discussion (Akama et al., 2010). As such, discourse becomes a key component of leadership because communication serves as the avenue for action and the transmission of knowledge to occur (Fairhurst & Connaughton, 2014). Thus, the third research question posited:
Method
As is outlined in the literature review, knowledge comes into being through discourse. These words and symbols construct social meaning that leads to understanding and identity (Gee, 2014). Therefore, to understand how American-based SMAs provide leadership through the discourse or wording of their mission statements, the mission statements—or similar discursive artifacts, such as vision statements or other statements outlining the objectives of the association—were collected from the websites or other online presences of 83 student media organizations, which yielded mission statements representing 41 different states and a total of 3,695 words to be analyzed. The mission statements were found primarily via a list hosted by the Journalism Education Association (JEA), and organizations not listed there were found through internet searches. The list compiled for this investigation included high school and collegiate associations to cast a wide net that gathered as much data as possible and look at a variety of SMAs. While no claims of being all-inclusive are made, this sample nonetheless represents an important and vital cross section of mission statements from leading organizations.
After gathering the mission statements, thematic analysis (TA) was conducted. TA, according to Terry and Hayfield (2021), is a method of theme construction where “meaning-based patterns” are identified (p. 3). Specifically, this research adopted the reflexive TA approach designed by Braun and Clarke (2006). This style of TA utilizes a six-step process for conducting the research (Braun & Clarke, 2021; Kiger & Varpio, 2020). This entailed an iterative process of multiple reading and coding sessions to identify and refine themes while organizing and describing the data (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Nowell et al., 2017; Saldaña, 2021). The themes were determined through inductive analysis, which allowed the data to dictate the themes (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Kiger & Varpio, 2020).
It should be noted that there are certain limitations to this research. For instance, every journalism education SMA in existence is not represented in the data set. Also, this study only considers the language used in the mission statements themselves. It does not explore how that language impacts journalism educators or students because doing so would require additional methods such as surveys and in-depth interviews. As such, this study sets the stage for future research in journalism education that can build on the findings of this investigation, which are provided in the following section.
Findings
Thematic analysis (TA) revealed patterns of meaning (Braun & Clarke, 2021) within the 83 U.S.-based student media organizations’ mission statements or other discursive statements investigated for this research. Five themes emerged. These include the following: Supporting Journalism Education, Building Democratic Citizenship, Instilling Civic Knowledge, Affirming Student Rights and Responsibilities, and Demonstrating Leadership. Each of these is defined and tied to specific research questions in the following sections.
The first research question (
Building on this, the second research question (
Another theme applicable to the second research question (
Closely related to the attributes of civic knowledge are concepts of rights and responsibilities. As such, a final theme answering the second research question (
Finally, the third research question (
Discussion
The themes uncovered highlight how the language of SMAs provides discursive leadership, especially when it comes to journalism education. This finding is important because citizens need reliable and trustworthy journalism to act as an informed public and combat the spread of political polarization and division that damages democracy (Darr et al., 2021; Druckman et al., 2019; Dzur, 2002). Each theme showcases how the SMAs work to develop journalism and an informed public.
Supporting Journalism Education
As the results of the study pointed out, the most prevalent theme was Supporting Journalism Education, which is unsurprising. Indeed, if an entity exists with the assumed rationale to support a given individual or activity, it only makes sense for the mission statement to proclaim such support. A prime example of this comes from the JEA, which boasts one of the largest memberships (Klein, 2022) of student media associations within this data set. Its mission statement explained that it “supports free and responsible scholastic journalism by providing resources and educational opportunities, by promoting professionalism, by encouraging and rewarding student excellence and teacher achievement, and by fostering an atmosphere which encompasses diversity yet builds unity.”
In this example, “support” and “scholastic journalism” are explicitly highlighted, along with “educational opportunities” and “rewarding” students and teachers. Similarly, the NCTE Assembly for Advisers of School Publications/JEA mission statement articulated that the organizations “is devoted to improving the teaching and learning,” which speaks to a focus on education from both the educator and student perspectives. Although those examples come from national associations, regional associations follow a similar pattern, but some lacked discussion of events, training opportunities, or awards and recognition.
From a state association perspective, the theme was also prevalent. One example comes from the Journalism Education Association of Northern California mission statement. It highlighted that the organization “is committed to serving scholastic journalism educators and their students.” In addition, the Washington Journalism Education Association (WJEA) mission statement explained the organization assists members and argues “that student publications are an important, vital part of the school curriculum; that is essential to the survival of this country”; and offers trainings for advisers and students. Within this, several components of the theme can be found, such as the importance of student media in terms of democracy.
Building Democratic Citizenship
With journalism playing a foundational role in democracy, most of the mission statements had this connection and upheld the idea of facilitating citizenship development as an important consideration in the work they do. For example, the American Society of News Editors (ASNE) Youth Journalism Initiative’s mission statement highlighted its goal of “helping students learn why news matters and acquire the skills needed to succeed as 21st-century citizens” and supporting “journalism and democracy by providing resources and training in youth journalism; news, information and media literacy; and the First Amendment and civic education.”
Furthermore, the Texas Association of Journalism Educators (TAJE) mentioned democracy specifically, and other expressions about citizenship and being citizens in a democracy also existed. The Colorado Student Media Association (CSMA) addressed this by pointing out the need for “students to use the mass media in their role as media consumers and citizens.” Closely related was the statement from the Iowa High School Press Association, which urged journalism education to help each student to understand how “to use the mass media in understanding his/her role as a citizen.” To that end, civic knowledge can be increased because civics concerns understanding the attributes of democracy and citizenship as important aspects of societal participation (Zuckerman, 2014).
Instilling Civic Knowledge
When examining this theme, however, only two associations explicitly illuminated the importance of such duties and responsibilities. These included the ASNE Youth Journalism Initiative and the Center for Scholastic Journalism. These associations used “civic education” to draw attention to the concept. A few organizations discussed the concept more generally. For example, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) listed individual rights as “the most essential qualities of liberty” in its mission statement.
The intentional use of literacy discourse also showed up. Literacy, specifically media literacy, appeared within the discourse as an avenue for civic knowledge because literate news consumers can evaluate information more effectively and use that knowledge to make better-informed decisions within civic life (Friesem, 2019; Peifer & Meisinger, 2021; Russmann & Hess, 2020). Again, only two mission statements used the term “literacy” specifically, those being from the ASNE Youth Journalism Initiative and NCTE Assembly for Advisers of School Publications/JEA. However, several other statements promoted media literacy through the language used. For example, the Pennsylvania School Press Association mission statement mentioned “responsible citizenship and informed media consumption.” Also, the CSMA mission statement highlighted the role of media consumption within citizenship.
Affirming Student Rights and Responsibilities
A key component of citizenship is understanding one’s rights, and this theme concerning student rights and responsibility comes into consideration. Primarily, this theme advances journalism education and civic knowledge by calling attention to components of the law and the related notion of ethics. As would be expected due to the nature of the association itself, the mission statement of the Student Press Law Center epitomizes this. Most also included such discussions, but the emphasis on the law was balanced with the other concerns of the organization. Still, including verbiage about the First Amendment, the law, or ethics was frequent.
For example, the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication mission statement argued a portion of its focus was “to defend and maintain freedom of communication,” and Youth Journalism International’s statement suggested the organization “promotes and defends a free youth press.” Likewise, the Florida Scholastic Press Association mission statement articulated the belief that “the responsible exercise of freedom of expression involves adherence to the highest standards of journalism” and an educational “obligation to learn and practice the legal and ethical responsibilities expected of journalists.” Using nearly identical language, the Michigan Interscholastic Press Association mission statement expressed the same sentiment with the addition of explicit support of “First Amendment rights of student journalists.” Similarly, the TAJE statement suggested its goal is to “emphasize and teach responsible and ethical journalism and to be a catalyst for lessons in freedom of expression and democracy.”
The inclusion of discourse surrounding the rights and responsibilities speaks to the organizations’ positions in which they “support a free press in a democratic society,” as the WJEA expressed, and the Kansas Collegiate Media statement drove the point home by stressing an emphasis on “supporting and promoting the First Amendment.” By incorporating such ideas of the First Amendment and free expression into their mission statements, these student media associations articulate awareness about student journalism and attributes of citizenship people need to know. This sets stage for the organizations to provide leadership.
Demonstrating Leadership
By using words like “empower,” “promote,” and “encourage,” the mission statements give members agency to exercise their rights, responsibilities, and skills in service of journalism and democratic citizenship. For example, the CSMA used “encourage” in seven of the nine sentences making up its mission statement, and “encourage” was the first word in all but three of those sentences. When it comes to promoting, using “promote” or some derivative of the word signals to the reader that the association backs the work being done by the members because if the organization was not supportive of the work, they would not spread awareness about it. In most cases, the use of “promote” was accompanied by “excellence” or discussions concerning “professional” practices and careers.
Beyond encouraging members to produce high-quality media, standing up for journalism programs through advocacy and representation also provide forms of leadership. For example, Oklahoma Scholastic Media claimed “to advocate for and provide education, training and assistance to scholastic media advisers and students across Oklahoma.” Also, the Virginia Association of Journalism Teachers and Advisers suggested its role is “to act as an advocate for scholastic journalism.”
Key to being advocates is adequately representing the membership, which is why it is worth noting that several mission statements mentioned who can be members. The majority pointed to students and advisers of all media types. In addition, the state associations typically referenced the geographic area they covered, as did the regional and national associations. For instance, Youth Journalism International used “globe” to highlight its reach, and the Private School Journalism Association set itself apart by explaining it “is the only organization of its type exclusively dedicated to supporting student publications at the over 1,800 private and independent schools in the United States.”
Through all the discourse used, leadership emerges. The use of declarative statements and words such as “support,” “encourage,” “provide,” and more establish this. Only one organization—the Kansas Scholastic Press Association—explicitly referred to itself as a leader by suggesting that the entity “views its focus as one of providing journalism education leadership for Kansas teachers and students.”
Conclusion
Understanding the language SMAs use to provide leadership and guidance to journalism education practitioners proves important as individuals work to prepare students for careers in the media and to be members of a democratic society. These mission statements need to be considered due to their potential impact on the curricular decisions being made in programs of study. Since journalism education is beginning to focus on industry elements such as analyzing audiences (Nelson & Edgerly, 2022), the mission statements can provide a foundational grounding in the world of journalism, establishing a starting point for what students need to understand to be successful.
In conclusion, as Holmes et al. (2022) suggested, “it is critical for students to obtain a broad knowledge base of the industry, including a focus on commonly used terminology” (p. 288). To that end, SMA mission statements can provide vital conceptual starting points for educators as they develop their curricula. This means that attention must be paid to how the SMAs exercise leadership, and the study reported here fills a gap in the literature and establishes an important baseline for future research in this understudied area.
Footnotes
Appendix
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
