The Use of Clarification Sessions in the Treatment of Incest Victims and Their Families: An Exploratory Study

Abstract

The "clarification session" has been implicated as an important component of the treatment of families affected by incest. On the basis of information presented in clinical literature, however, the specific nature of this intervention varies widely. This exploratory study examined the practices and attitudes regarding clarification sessions of select members of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Surveys were completed by 483 members. Results indicated that approximately 77% of respondents had experience in conducting clarification sessions. The top two reported reasons for conducting clarification sessions were for the perpetrator to assume all responsibility for the abuse and to decrease the level of self-blame of the victim. The majority of respondents concurred that several activities needed to occur prior to the clarification session, whereas less consensus was indicated for activities that were deemed essential during the clarification session. Respondents' practices, attitudes, and beliefs are discussed in terms of the current state of limited, empirically based knowledge in this area. Directions for future research are suggested.

Keywords

clarification session incest sexual perpetrator sexual abuse treatment.

References

DeMaio, C.M. , Smith, D.W. , Davis, J.L. , & Saunders, B.E. (2002). Using conjoint clarification sessions in the treatment of incest victims. In L. VandeCreek & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A sourcebook (Vol. 20, pp. 285-298). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

Fein, E. , & Bishop, G.V. (1987). Child sexual abuse: Treatment for the offender. Social Casework. The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 68, 122-124

Furniss, T. (1984). Organizing a therapeutic approach to intra-familial child sexual abuse. Journal of Adolescence, 7, 309-317.

Hartley, C.C. (1998). How incest offenders overcome internal inhibitions through the use of cognitions and cognitive distortions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 25-39.

Hoorwitz, A.N. (1983). Guidelines for treating father-daughter incest . Social Casework, pp. 515-524.

LaCalle, J.J. (1987). Incest: Offender treatment and family therapy . American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5, 43-46.

Lipovsky, J.A. (1991). Disclosure of father-child sexual abuse: Dilemmas for families and therapists. Contemporary Family therapy, 13, 85-101.

Lipovsky, J.A. , Swenson, C.C. , Ralston, M.E. , & Saunders, B.E. (1998). The abuse clarification process in the treatment of intrafamilial abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 729-741.

Marshall, W.L. , & Pithers, W.D. (1994). A reconsideration of treatment outcome with sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2, 10-27.

10.

Meinig, M.B. , & Bonner, B.L. (1990). Returning the treated offender to the family. Violence Update, 1, 1, 3, 10-11.

11.

Morris, T.L. , Lipovsky, J.A. , & Saunders, B.E. (1996). The role of perpetrator acknowledgment in mediating the impact of child sexual assault: An exploratory study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 5, 95-101.

12.

Salter, A. C. (Ed.). (1995). Transforming trauma: A guide to understanding and treating adult survivors of child sexual abuse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Saunders, B.E. , & Meinig, M.B. (1995). Family resolution therapy: The latter stages of treatment with father-child incest families. Presentation sponsored by the Sedgewick county Sexual Abuse Task Force & the Wichita Area Sexual Assault Ctr, Wichita, KA.

14.

Schwartz, B.K. (1992). Effective treatment techniques for sex offenders . Psychiatric Annals, 22, 315-319.

15.

Sgroi, S.M. (1988). Community-based treatment for sexual offenders against children. In S. M. Sgroi (Ed.), Vulnerable populations: Evaluation and treatment of sexually abused children and adult survivors (pp. 351-393). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

16.

Trepper, T. S. , & Barrett, M. J. (Eds.). (1986). Treating incest: A multiple systems perspective. New York: Haworth.