This study compares the news coverage of election campaigns in three Swedish newspapers at the time of the 2002 national election and three U.S. newspapers at the time of the 2004 presidential election. The results from the content analysis show that the metaframe of politics as a strategic game was more common in the U.S. newspapers, while the metaframe of politics as issues was more common in the Swedish newspapers. U.S. articles were also more likely to use the horse-race and political strategy frames. While U.S. coverage was predominantly descriptive in focus, an interpretive journalistic style was more often dominant in the Swedish articles. The results also show that the U.S. news stories were triggered by the words and actions of the campaigns more often than the Swedish news stories.
Åsard, Erik, and W. Lance Bennett. 1997. Democracy and the Marketplace of Ideas.Communicatoin and Government in Sweden and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Asp, Kent. 2003. Medieval 2002. Partiskheten och valutgången. En studie av valrörelsens medialisering. Göteborg, Sweden: JMG/Göteborgs universitet.
3.
Bartels, Larry M.2002. “The Impact of Candidate Traits in American Presidential Elections.” In Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, ed. Anthony King. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Bennett,W. Lance. 2003. News.The Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman.
5.
Benoit,William L., Kevin A. Stein, and Glenn J. Hansen. 2005. “New York Times Coverage of Presidential Campaigns.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly82(2):356–376.
6.
Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch. 1995. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.
7.
Blumler, Jay G., and Denis McQuail. 2001. “Political Communication Scholarship:The Uses of Election Research.” In Election Studies.What's Their Use? ed. Elihu Katz and Yael Warshel. Boulder, CO:Westview.
8.
Bryant, Jennings, and Dorina Miron. 2004. “Theory and Research in Mass Communication.” Journal of Communication54(4):662–704.
9.
Callaghan, Karen, and Frauke Schnell. 2005. “Introduction: Framing Political Issues in American Politics.” In Framing American Politics, ed. Karen Callaghan and Frauke Schnell. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
10.
Cappella, Joseph N., and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism.The Press and the Public Good. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Ceaser, James W., and Andrew E. Busch. 2005. Red over Blue.The 2004 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
Croteau, David, and William Hoynes. 2001. The Business of Media.Corporate Media and the Public Interest.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
13.
De Vreese, Claes H.2003. Framing Europe.Television News and European Integration.Amsterdam: Aksant.
14.
De Vreese, Claes H., Susan A. Banducci, Holli Semetko, and Hajo Boomgaarden. 2005. “Political Campaigning in the New Europe: The News Coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary Election Campaign in 25 Countries.” Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Washington D.C.
15.
Dimitrova, Daniela V., and Jesper Strömbäck. 2005. “Mission Accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the Elite Newspapers in Sweden and the United States.” Gazette:The International Journal for Communication Studies67(5):401–419.
16.
Djerf-Pierre, Monika, and Lennart Weibull. 2001. Spegla, granska, tolka. Aktualitetsjournalistik i svensk radio och TV under 1900-talet. Stockholm, Sweden: Prisma.
17.
Donsbach,Wolfgang, and Thomas E. Patterson. 2004. “Political News Journalists: Partisanship, Professionalism, and Political Roles in Five Countries.” In Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Entman, Robert. 1993. “Framing:Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication43(4):51–58.
19.
Entman, Robert M.2004. Projections of Power. Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Entman, Robert M.2005. “Foreword.” In Framing American Politics, ed. Karen Callaghan and Frauke Schnell. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
21.
Esser, Frank, and Barbara Pfetsch, eds. 2004. Comparing Political Communication.Theories, Cases, and Challenges. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and Robert S. Lichter. 2006. The Mediated Presidency.Television News and Presidential Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
Franklin, Mark N.2004. Voter Turnout and The Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Gitlin,Todd. 1980. The Whole World Is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Graber, Doris A.2005. “Political Communication Faces the 21st Century.” Journal of Communication55(3):479–507.
26.
Granberg, Donald, and Sören Holmberg. 1988. The Political System Matters.Social Psychology and Voting Behavior in Sweden and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Gulati, Girish J., Marion R. Just, and Ann N. Crigler. 2004. “News Coverage of Political Campaigns.” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, ed. Lynda Lee Kaid. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems.Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Holmberg, Sören, and Henrik Oscarsson. 2004. Väljare. Svenskt väljarbeteende under 50 år. Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts juridik.
30.
Holmberg, Sören, and Lennart Weibull. 2005. “Lyckan kommer, lyckan går.” In Lyckan kommer, lyckan går, ed. Sören Holmberg and Lennart Weibull. Göteborg, Sweden: SOM-institutet.
31.
Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
Kaase, Max. 2000. “Germany: A Society and a Media System in Transition.” In Democracy and the Media.A Comparative Perspective, ed. Richard Gunther and Anthony Mughan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Kaid, Lynda Lee. 2004. “Political Advertising.” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, ed. Lynda Lee Kaid. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Kaid, Lynda Lee, Jacques Gerstlé, and Keith Sanders, eds. 1991. Mediated Politics in Two Cultures. Presidential Campaigning in the United States and France. New York: Praeger.
35.
Kaid, Lynda Lee, and Christina Holtz-Bacha, eds. 1995. Political Advertising in Western Democracies. Parties & Candidates on Television. London: Sage.
36.
Katz, Richard S., and Robin Kolodny. 1994. “Party Organization as an Empty Vessel: Parties in American Politics.” In How Parties Organize.Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, ed. Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair. London: Sage.
37.
Maher,T. Michael. 2001. “Framing: An Emerging Paradigm or a Phase of Agenda Setting?” In Framing Public Life.Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, ed. Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
McCombs, Maxwell. 2004. Setting the Agenda. The Mass Media and Public Opinion. London: Polity.
39.
McCombs, Maxwell, and Salma I. Ghanem. 2001. “The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing.” In Framing Public Life.Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, eds. Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
McManus, John H.1994. Market-Driven Journalism. Let the Citizen Beware?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle. Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies.New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Nord, Lars. 2001. Vår tids ledare. En studie av den svenska dagspressens politiska opinionsbildning. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlssons.
43.
Patterson,Thomas E.1993. Out of Order. New York:Vintage.
44.
Patterson,Thomas E.1998. “Political Roles of the Journalist.” In The Politics of News,The News of Politics, ed. Doris A. Graber, Denis McQuail, and Pippa Norris.Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
45.
Patterson,Thomas E.2000a. Doing Well and Doing Good.How Soft News and Critical Journalism Are Shrinking the News Audience and Weakening Democracy—And What News Outlets Can Do about It. Boston: Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy.
46.
Patterson,Thomas E.2000b. “The United States: News in a Free-Market Society.” In Democracy and the Media.A Comparative Perspective, ed. Richard Gunther and Anthony Mughan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Petersson, Olof, Monika Djerf-Pierre, Jesper Strömbäck, and Lennart Weibull. 2005. Mediernas integritet. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag.
48.
Petersson, Olof, Klaus von Beyme, Lauri Karvonen, Birgitta Nedelmann, and Eivind Smith. 1999. Demokrati på svenskt vis. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag.
49.
Picard, Robert G.2005. “Money, Media, and the Public Interest.” In The Press, ed. Geneva Overholser and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
Plasser, Fritz, and Gunda Plasser. 2002. Global Political Campaigning. A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices.Westport, CT: Praeger.
51.
Price,Vincent, David Tewksbury, and Elizabeth Powers. 1997. “Switching Trains of Thought: The Impact of News Frames on Readers' Cognitive Responses.” Communication Research24:481–506.
52.
Reese, Stephen D.2001. “Prologue—Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research.” In Framing Public Life.Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, ed. Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Schnell, Frauke, and Karen Callaghan. 2005. “Terrorism, Media Frames, and Framing Effects: A Macro-and Microlevel Analysis.” In Framing American Politics, ed. Karen Callaghan and Frauke Schnell. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
54.
Semetko, Holli A.2000. “Great Britain: The End of News at Ten and the Changing News Environment.” In Democracy and the Media.A Comparative Perspective, ed. Richard Gunther and Anthony Mughan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Semetko, Holli A., Jay G. Blumler, Michael Gurevitch, and David H.Weaver. 1991. The Formation of Campaign Agendas. A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
Sparks, Colin. 2000.“Introduction:The Panic over Tabloid News.” In Tabloid Tales.Global Debates over Media Standards, ed. Colin Sparks and John Tulloch. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
57.
Strömbäck, Jesper. 2004. Den medialiserade demokratin. Om journalistikens ideal, verklighet och makt. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag.
58.
Strömbäck, Jesper. 2005. “Commercialization and the Media Coverage of Swedish National Elections in 1998 and 2002.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association,Washington D.C.
59.
Thies, Michael F.2000.“On the Primacy of Party in Government:Why Legislative Parties Can Survive Party Decline in the Electorate.” In Parties without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Russel J. Dalton and Martin P.Wattenberg. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Waldahl, Ragnar, and Hanne Marthe Narud. 2004.“Den ‘korte’ valgkampen. Mediestoffet i fire uker før valget.” In Ivalgkampens hete.Strategisk kommunikasjon og politisk usikkerhet, ed. Bernt Aardal,Anne Krogstad, and Hanne Marthe Narud. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
61.
Wirth, Werner, and Steffen Kolb. 2004. “Designs and Methods of Comparative Political Communication Research.” In Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges, ed. Frank Esser and Barbara Pfetsch. New York: Cambridge University Press.
