We conducted a content analysis of 505 editorial cartoons drawn from a national sample of newspapers during the 1992 presidential campaign. Our analyses demonstrate that cartoons are less interested in policy and more concerned with candidate personalities and the nature of the campaign. In addition, negativity is the hallmark of editorial cartoon reporting. We find that there was no measurable advantage given to the incumbent in 1992. Furthermore, we did not find evidence that the partisan leanings of a newspaper significantly affected the nature of candidate evaluations in the paper's editorial cartoons. Finally, evaluations about the candidates' personal qualities are shown to be a central component in editorial cartoons.
References
1.
Beniger, James . 1983. “Does Television Enhance the Shared Symbolic Environment?”American Sociological Review48(1):103-111.
2.
Bormann, Ernest , Jolene Koester, and Janet Bennett. 1978. “Political Cartoons and Salient Rhetorical Fantasies.”Communication Monographs45(4):317-329.
3.
Brians, Craig , and Martin Wattenberg. 1996. “Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience.”American Journal of Political Science (40)1:172-193.
4.
Broder, David . 1987. Behind the Front Page. New York: Simon and Schuster.
5.
Buell, Emmett , and Mike Maus. 1988. “Is the Pen Mightier Than the Word? Editorial Cartoons and 1988 Presidential Nominating Politics.”PS (Fall)21(3): 847-858.
6.
Chase, John . 1962. Today's Cartoons. New Orleans: Hauser Press.
7.
Cundy, Donald . 1989. “Televised Political Editorials and the Low-Involvement Viewer.”Social Science Quarterly70(4):911-921.
8.
Dalton, Russell , William Koetzle, Paul Allen Beck, and Robert Huckfeldt. 1994. “Newspaper Content and Electoral Politics: The 1992 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign.”University of California, Irvine, Focused Research Program on Democratization.
9.
Entman, Robert . 1989. “How the Media Affect What People Think.”Journal of Politics51(2):347-370.
10.
Erbring, Lutz , Edie Goldenberg, and Arthur H. Miller. 1980. “Front-Page News and Real-World Cues.”American Journal of Political Science24(1): 16-49.
11.
Grofman, Bernard . 1981. “Political Cartoons as Political Arguments.”University of California, Irvine. Typescript.
12.
Grofman, Bernard . 1989. “Richard Nixon as Pinocchio, Richard II, and Santa Claus.”Journal of Politics51(1):165-173.
13.
Hill, Alette . 1978. “The Carter Campaign in Retrospect.”Semiotica23(3):307-332.
14.
Iyengar, Shanto . 1987. “Television News and Citizens' Explanations of National Affairs.”American Political Science Review81(3):815-831.
15.
Iyengar, Shanto , and Donald Kinder. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Iyengar, Shanto , Mark Peters, and Donald Kinder. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the `Not-So-Minimal' Consequences of Television News Programs.”American Political Science Review76(3):848-858.
17.
Kinder, Donald . 1978. “Political Person Perception.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36(8):859-871.
18.
Kinder, Donald , and R. Abelson. 1981. “Appraising Presidential Candidates: Personality and Affect in the 1980 Campaign.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.
19.
Kinder, Donald , Gordon Adams, and Paul Gronke. 1989. “Economics and Politics in the 1984 American Presidential Election.”American Journal of Political Science33(2):491-515.
20.
Krosnick, Jon , and Donald Kinder. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming.”American Political Science Review84(2):497-512.
21.
MacKuen, Michael . 1984. “Exposure to Information, Belief Integration, and Individual Responsiveness to Agenda Change.”American Political Science Review78(1):372-391.
22.
MacKuen, Michael , and Steven Coombs. 1981. More Than News. Beverly Hills: Sage.
23.
Marcus, George . 1988. “The Structure of Emotional Response: 1984 Presidential Candidates.”American Political Science Review82(3):737-761.
24.
McCombs, Maxwell , and Donald Shaw. 1972. “The Agenda-setting Function of the Mass Media.”Public Opinion Quarterly36(1): 176-187.
25.
McCombs, Maxwell , Edna Einsiedel, and David Weaver. 1991. Contemporary Public Opinion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Paine, Albert . 1967. Th. Nast: His Period and His Pictures. Gloucester, MA: Pearson.
27.
Paletz, David . 1990. “Political Humor and Authority: From Support to Subversion.”International Political Science Review11(4):483-493.
28.
Patterson, Thomas . 1980. The Mass Media Election. New York: Praeger.
29.
RePass, David . 1971. “Issue Salience and Party Choice.”American Political Science Review65(2):389-400.
30.
Robinson, Michael , and Margaret Sheehan. 1983. Over the Wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in Campaign 1980. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31.
Sena, John . 1985. “A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Votes.”Journal of American Culture8(1):2-12.
32.
Seymour-Ure, Colin . 1986. “Drawn and Quartered: The Election in Cartoons.” In Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1983, ed. Ivor Crewe and Martin Haroop. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Shaw, Donald , and Maxwell McCombs. 1977. The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda Setting Function of the Press. St. Paul: West.
34.
Wattenberg, Martin . 1991. The Rise of Candidate Centered Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Weaver, David , Doris Graber, Maxwell McCombs, and Chaim Eyal. 1981. Media Agenda Setting in a Presidential Election. New York: Praeger.
36.
Zukin, Cliff , and Robin Snyder. 1984. “Passive Learning: When the Media Environment Is the Message.”Public Opinion Quarterly48(3):629-638.
