This article documents how a small, oppressed, and seemingly powerless community in Louisiana persevered to defeat the strategic plans of a multinational chemical company that was supported by local and state government elites. The evolving construct of environmental justice played a significant part in this battle as community groups formed coalitions with local, state, and national agents and organizations to challenge the decision to site a hazardous facility. Lawsuits resulted in costs, lengthy delays, and uncertainty for the corporation, leading Shintech to abandon its original site of choice. Data were gathered from media archives and coded and analyzed using grounded theory methodology. Implications of the study are discussed for stakeholder theory, environmental justice scholars, and community advocacy groups, as it is even more clear from this landmark case that noxious industries can be thwarted as they attempt expansion, start-up, or even permit renewal, especially in minority or economically deprived communities.
Alston, D. (Ed.). (1990). We speak for ourselves: Social justice, race and environment. Washington, DC: Panos Institute.
2.
Austin, J.R. (1997). A method for facilitating controversial social change in organizations: Branch Rickey and the Brooklyn Dodgers. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(1), 101-118.
3.
Beamish, T.D. (2001). Environmental hazard and institutional betrayal. Organization & Environment, 14(1), 5-33.
4.
Beatley, T. (1994). Ethical land-use: Principles of policy and planning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5.
Bendheim, C.L. , Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. (1998). Determining best practice in corporate-stakeholder relations using data envelopment analysis: An industry-level study. Business and Society, 37(3), 306-338.
6.
Berry, G.R. (2001). Telling stories: Making sense of the environmental behavior of chemical firms. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(1), 58-73.
7.
Bryant, B. (Ed.). (1995). Environmental justice: Issues, policies, and solutions. Washington, DC: Island Press.
8.
Bullard, R.D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview.
9.
Burke, E.M. (1999). Corporate community relations: The principle of neighbor of choice. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
10.
Buttel, F.H. (1985). Environmental quality and the state: Some political-sociological observations on environmental regulation. Research in Political Sociology, 1, 167-188.
11.
Capek, S.M. (1993). The "environmental justice" frame: A conceptual discussion and an application. Social Problems, 40(1), 5-24.
12.
Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
13.
Carroll, A.B. (1995). Stakeholder thinking in three models of management morality: A perspective with strategic implications. In J. Hasi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 47-74). Helsinki, Finland: LSR.
14.
Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
15.
Clarkson, M.B.E. (Ed.). (1998). The corporation and its stakeholders. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
16.
Clegg, S.R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
17.
Davenport, K. (2000). Corporate citizenship: A stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessing it. Business and Society, 39(2), 210-219.
18.
Denzin, N.K. , & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Donaldson, T. , & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
20.
Edelstein, M. (1988). Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
Evan, W.M. , & Freeman, R.E. (1988). The stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 97-106). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
Foreman, C.H., Jr. (1998). The promise and peril of environmental justice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
23.
Freeman, R. (1984). Stakeholder management: A stakeholder approach. New York: Basic Books.
24.
Gamson, W.A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A.D. Morris & C.M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53-76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Giugni, M.G. (1998). Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 371-393.
26.
Gould, K.A. (1994). Legitimacy and growth in the balance: The role of the state in environmental remediation. Industrial and Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 8, 237-256.
27.
Greening, D.W. , & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467-498.
28.
Hurley, A. (1995). Environmental inequalities: Class, race, and industrial pollution in Gary, Indiana, 1945-1980. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
29.
Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 404-437.
30.
Kroll-Smith, J.S. , & Couch, S.R. (1991). Technological hazards, adaptation and social change. In S.R. Couch & J.S. Kroll-Smith (Eds.), Communities at risk: Collective responses to technological hazards (pp. 293-320). New York: Peter Lang.
31.
Logsdon, J.M. , Wood, D.J., & Benson, L.E. (2000). Research in stakeholder theory: The Sloan Foundation minigrant project. Toronto, Canada: Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics.
32.
Mander, J. , & Goldsmith, E. (Eds.). (1996). The case against the global economy: And for a turn toward the local. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
33.
Mitchell, R.K. , Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
34.
Mohai, P. (1990). Black environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 744-765.
35.
Ogden, S. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 526-538.
36.
Orssatto, R.E. , & Clegg, S.R. (1999). The political ecology of organizations: Toward a framework for analyzing business environment relationships. Organization & Environment, 12(3), 263-279.
Pichardo, N.A. (1997). New social movements: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 411-430.
39.
Prakash, A. (2000). Responsible care: An assessment. Business and Society, 39(2), 183-209.
40.
Roberts, J.T. , & Toffolon-Weiss, M.M. (2001). Chronicles from the environmental justice frontline. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Roberts, R.W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595-612.
42.
Rowley, T.I. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-911.
43.
Snow, D.A. , & Benford, R.D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-218.
44.
Stake, R.E. (1994). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Szasz, A. , & Meusser, M. (1997). EcoPopulism: Toxic wastes and the movement for environmental justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47.
Szasz, A. , & Meusser, M. (2000). Unintended, inexorable: The production of environmental inequalities in Santa Clara County, California. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 602-632.
48.
Taylor, D.E. (1993). Environmentalism and the politics of inclusion. In R.D. Bullard (Ed.), Confronting environmental racism: Voices from the grassroots (pp. 55-57). Boston: South End.
49.
Taylor, D.E. (1997). American environmentalism: The role of race, class and gender in shaping activism, 1820-1995. Race, Gender and Class, 5(1), 16-62.
50.
Taylor, D.E. (2000). The rise of the environmental justice paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 508-580.
51.
United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice . (1987). Toxic wastes and race in the United States: A national study of the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste sites. New York: United Church of Christ.
52.
Vaughan, D. (1999). The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 271-305.
53.
Vogel, D. (1996). Kindred strangers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
Waddock, S. , & Smith, N. (2000). Relationships: The real challenge of corporate global citizenship. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 47-62.
55.
Walker, S.F. , & Marr, J.W. (2001). Stakeholder power: A winning plan for building stakeholder commitment and driving corporate growth. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
56.
Wartick, S.L. , & Cochran, P.L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 4, 758-769.
57.
Wheeler, D. , & Sillanpaa, M. (1997). The stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value. London: Pitman.
58.
Wood, D.J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
59.
Yeager, P.C. (1987). Structural bias in regulatory law enforcement: The case of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Social Problems, 34, 330-344.
