According to one perspective, organizations will only be sustainable if the dominant neoclassical model of the firm is transformed, rather than supplemented, by social and environmental priorities. This article seeks to develop a “sustainability business model” (SBM)—a model where sustainability concepts shape the driving force of the firm and its decision making. The SBM is drawn from two case studies of organizations considered to be leaders in operationalizing sustainability and is informed by the ecological modernization perspective of sustainability. The analysis reveals that organizations adopting a SBM must develop internal structural and cultural capabilities to achieve firm-level sustainability and collaborate with key stakeholders to achieve sustainability for the system that an organization is part of.
Baker, S. (2007). Sustainable development as symbolic commitment: Declaratory politics and the seductive appeal of ecological modernisation in theEuropean Union. Environmental Politics, 16, 297-317.
3.
Bansal, P. (2002). The corporate challenges of sustainable development . Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 122-131.
4.
Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510-527.
5.
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal , 26, 197-218.
6.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717-736.
7.
Bendigo Bank. (2003). A Rewarding Focus: Bendigo Bank Concise Annual Report 2003. Retrieved March 24, 2008, from http://www.bendigobank.com.au/public/about_us/pdf/Concise_Annual_Report_2003.pdf
8.
Bendigo Bank. (2005). Knowing the way forward: Bendigo Bank Concise Annual Report 2005. Retrieved March 24, 2008, from http://www.bendigobank.com.au/public/about_us/pdf/Concise_Annual_Report_2005.pdf
9.
Benn, S., Dunphy, D., & Griffiths, A. (2006, September). Enabling change for corporate sustainability: An integrated perspective. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 13, 156-165.
10.
Blaikie, N.W.H. (1993). Approaches to social enquiry. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, Blackwell.
11.
Blaikie, N.W.H. (2000). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation . Malden, MA: Polity Press.
12.
Boutilier, R. (2005). Views of sustainable development: A typology of stakeholders' conflicting perspectives. In M. Starik, S. Sharma, C. Egri, & R. Bunch (Eds.), New Horizons in Research on Sustainable Organisations: Emerging ideas, approaches and tools for practitioners and researchers (pp. 19-37). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
13.
Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-opetition (1st ed.). New York: Doubleday.
14.
Brenner, S., & Cochrane, P. (1991). The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and research. IABS Proceedings1991, 449-467.
Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H.E., Goodland, R., & Norgaard, R. (1997). An introduction to ecological economics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.
17.
Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or cornucopia: The environment, politics, and the future. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18.
Daly, H.E., & Cobb, J.B. (1994). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.
19.
Doppelt, B. (2003). Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Sheffield , UK: Greenleaf.
20.
Doty, D.H., & Glick, W.H. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19, 230-251.
21.
Douthwaite, R. (1999). The growth illusion: How economic growth has enriched the few, impoverished the many, and endangered the planet (Rev. ed.). Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society in association with the Lilliput Press.
22.
Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55-73.
23.
Dunphy, D.C., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S. (2003). Organizational change for corporate sustainability: A guide for leaders and change agents of the future. London : Routledge.
24.
Egri, C.P., & Pinfield, L.T. (1996). Organizations and the biosphere: Ecologies and environments. In S. Clegg , C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 459-482). London: Sage.
25.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532.
26.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford, UK: Capstone.
27.
Elkington, J. (2001). The chrysalis economy: How citizen CEOs and corporations can fuse values and value creation. Oxford, UK: Capstone.
28.
Freeman, R.E., & Gilbert, D.R., Jr. (1992). Business, ethics and society: A critical agenda. Business & Society, 31, 9.
Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J., & Krause, T.-S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.
31.
Gouldson, A., & Murphy, J. (1997). Ecological modernisation: Restructuring industrial economies. In M. Jacobs (Ed.), Greening the Millennium? The new politics of the environment (pp. 74-86). Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
Griffiths, A. (2000). New organisational architectures: Creating and retrofitting for sustainability. In D. C. Dunphy, J. Benveniste, A. Griffiths, & P. Sutton (Eds.), Sustainability: The corporate challenge of the 21st century (pp. 219-235). St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
34.
Griffiths, A., & Petrick, J.A. (2001). Corporate architectures for sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21, 1573-1585.
35.
Hajer, M.A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
36.
Hardjono, T., & Klein, P.D. (2004). Introduction on the European Corporate Sustainability Framework (ECSF). Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 99-113.
37.
Hart, S.L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986-1014.
38.
Hart, S.L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66-76.
39.
Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability (1sted.). New York: HarperBusiness.
40.
Hunt, R. (2005). Creative capital, creative strategies, community-based wealth creation. Alfred Deakin Innovation Lectures, Vol. 2005. Available from http://www.deakinlectures.com/transcripts/2005.php
41.
Interface. (2003a). Mission statement, Vol. 2003. Retrieved December 4, 2003, from www.interfaceinc.com/goals/mission.html
42.
Interface. (2003b). Vision statement, Vol. 2003. Retrieved December 4, 2003, from www.interfaceinc.com/goals/vision.html
43.
Jacobs, M. (1997). The quality of life: Social goods and the politics of consumption. In M. Jacobs (Ed.), Greening the millennium? The new politics of the environment (pp. 47-61). Oxford , UK: Blackwell.
44.
Jänicke, M. (1990). State failure: The impotence of politics in industrial society (A. Braley, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, Basil Blackwell.
45.
Jennings, P.D., & Zandbergen, P.A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015-1052.
46.
Key, S. (1999). Toward a new theory of the firm: A critique of stakeholder "theory." Management Decision, 37, 317-328.
47.
Korhonen, J., & Snakin, J.-P. (2005). Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystems: Concepts and application. Ecological Economics, 52, 169-186.
48.
Korhonen, J., von Malmborg, F., Strachan, P.A., & Ehrenfeld, J.R. (2004). Management and policy aspects of industrial ecology: An emerging research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 289-305.
49.
Lawrence, A.T. (2002). The drivers of stakeholder engagement: Reflections on the case of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of Corporate Citizenship , 6, 71-85.
50.
Lovins, A.B., Lovins, L.H., & Hawken, P. (1999). A road map for natural capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 77, 145-158.
51.
Maine, M. (2000). Banks for people: Community banking-prospects and limits. Perth, Australia: Institute for Science and Technology Policy Murdoch University, ISTP occasional paper, 1/2000.
52.
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things . New York: North Point Press.
53.
Milanez, B., & Buhrs, T. (2007). Marrying strands of ecological modernisation: A proposed framework. Environmental Politics, 16, 565-583.
54.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations . London: Prentice Hall.
56.
Mol, A.P.J. (2006). Environment and modernity in transitional China: Frontiers of ecological modernization. Development and Change , 37(1), 29-56.
57.
Mol, A.P.J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernisation theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17-49.
58.
Moore, T. (2002). Community Bank branch investment: Motivations and consequences. Unpublished master's thesis, Monash University , Melbourne, Australia.
59.
O'Riordan, T. (1991). The new environmentalism and sustainable development . Science of the Total Environment, 108(1-2), 5-15.
60.
Purser, R.E., Park, C., & Montuori, A. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 20, 1053-1089.
61.
Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369-384.
62.
Rowledge, L.R., Barton, R.S., & Brady, K.S. (1999). Mapping the journey: Case studies in strategy and action toward sustainable development. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.
63.
Rowley, T.J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910.
64.
Sama, L.M., Welcomer, S.A., & Gerde, V.W. (2004). Who speaks for the trees? Invoking an ethic of care to give voice to the silent stakeholder. In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Stakeholders, the environment, and society (pp. 140-165). Cheltenham , UK: Edward Elgar.
65.
Sharma, S. (2002). Research in corporate sustainability: What really matters? In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Research in corporate sustainability: The evolving theory and practice of organizations in the natural environment (pp. 1-29). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
66.
Sharma, S., & Starik, M. (2004). Stakeholders, the environment and society: Multiple perspectives, emerging consensus. In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Stakeholders, the environment, and society (pp. 1-22). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
67.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 118-137.
68.
Starik, M. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 207-217.
69.
Stormer, F. (2003). Making the shift: Moving from "Ethics Pays" to an inter-systems model of business. Journal of Business Ethics , 44, 279-289.
70.
Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J.M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71.
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2007). Cooperative, community-spirited and commercial: Social sustainability at Bendigo Bank. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 14, 251-262.
72.
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (in press). An ecological modernist interpretation of sustainability: The case of Interface Inc. Business Strategy and the Environment .
73.
Sundaram, A.K., & Inkpen, A.C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15, 350-363.
74.
Tibbs, H. (1993). Industrial ecology: An environmental agenda for industry. Emeryville, CA: Global Business Network.
75.
von Weizsäcker, E., & Jesinghaus, J. (1992). Ecological tax reform: A policy proposal for sustainable development. London: Zed Books.
76.
Weale, A. (1992). The new politics of pollution. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
77.
Weber, M., Shils, E., & Finch, H.A. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
78.
Wicks, A.C. (1996). Overcoming the separation thesis: The need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business & Society, 35(1), 89-118.
79.
Windsor, D. (2004). Stakeholder influence strategies for smarter growth . In S. Sharma & M. Starik (Eds.), Stakeholders, the environment, and society (pp. 93-116). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
80.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82.
York, R., & Rosa, E.A. (2003). Key challenges to ecological modernization theory . Organization & Environment, 16, 273-288.
