Corrigendum

In the June 2013 issue of the Journal of Biomolecular Screening, in the above-mentioned article, the authors would like to correct an error in column 4 of Table 1 (Specific activity). It should read “10-2 nmol min-1 mg-1” instead of “nmol min-1 mg-1.” The authors do not comment on these absolute values per se, but rather on the ratio between the 3 FadD32 proteins.

Here is the section of the article citing these data:

“The specific activity of CgluFadD32 was only twice that of MtubFadD32 (Table 1). In sharp contrast, the dose-response curve for the MsmegFadD32 enzyme showed a linear response down to a few nanomolar of protein in the assay (Fig. 1D, inset). Indeed, the specific activity of MsmegFadD32 was approximately 75 times higher than that of the MtubFadD32 enzyme (Table 1).”

These conclusions therefore remain unchanged and do not affect the article’s conclusion.