Local health departments (LHDs) are changing service delivery mechanisms to accommodate changes in health care financing and decreased public support for governmental services. This study examined the extent to which North Carolina LHDs privatized and contracted out services and the effects on the time spent on core functions of public health and activities of health educators. Questionnaires were mailed to the senior health educators in all LHDs. Sixty-nine responded, and 68% of LHDs had not privatized any services other than laboratory and home health. Clinical services were more commonly privatized than nonclinical services. Respondents perceived that privatization produces more time for LHDs to address the core public health functions and for health educators to engage in appropriate professional activities. Health educators in LHDs that had not privatized were more likely to be concerned about potential negative effects. This study suggests that privatization has generally had a positive effect on the roles of health educators in North Carolina LHDs.
References
1.
1. Institute of Medicine: The Future of Public Health. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1988.
2.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Ten great public health achievements—United States, 1900-1999. MMWR48(12):241-243, 1999.
3.
3. Bronson RC, Kreuter MW: Future trends affecting public health: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice3(2):49-60, 1997.
4.
4. Freeman P, Robbins A: National health care reform minus public health: A formula for failure. Journal of Public Health Policy3:261-282, 1994.
5.
5. CDC: Health Education in Health Departments (DHHS Pub. No. 200-79-0916). Atlanta, GA, National Center for Health Promotion and Education, 1981.
6.
6. Turner CE: Community Health Educator’s Compendium of Knowledge-Turner CE: Community Health Educator’s Compendium of Knowledge. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby, 1951.
7.
7. Smillie WG: Public Health: Its Promise for the Future. New York, Macmillan, 1955.
8.
8. McLeroy KR, Bibeau, D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly18:351-378, 1988.
9.
9. Sorenson G, Emmons K, Hunt MK, Johnston D: Implications of the results of community intervention trials. Annual Review of Public Health1998;19:379-416.
10.
10. Gerzoff RB, Brown CK, Baker EL: Full-time employees of U.S. local health departments, 1992-1993. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice5(3):1-9, 1999.
11.
11. Helms CM: Health care system reform and public health. Archives of Family Medicine4:12-13, 1995.
12.
12.Lasker RD: Medicine and Public Health: The Power of Collaboration. New York, New York Academy of Medicine, 1997.
13.
13. Gordon RL, Baker EL, Roper WL, Omenn GS: Prevention and the reforming US health care system: Changing roles and responsibilities for public health. Annual Review of Public Health17:489-509, 1996.
14.
14. Institute of Medicine: Healthy communities: New partnerships for the future of public health, in Stoto MA, Abel C, Dievler A (eds.): A Report of the First Year of the Committee on Public Health. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1996.
15.
15. Wall S: Transformation in public health systems. Health Affairs17(3):54-80, 1998.
16.
16. Eggers WD, Ng R: Social and Health Service Privatization: A Survey of County and State Governments (Policy Study No. 168). Los Angeles, Reason Foundation, Privatization Center, 1993.
17.
17. Smith SR, Lipsky M: Privatization in health and human services: A critique. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law17(2):233-253, 1992.
18.
18. Halverson PK, Kaluzny AD, Mays GP, Richards TB: Privatizing health services: Alternative models and emerging issues for public health and quality management. Quality Management in Health Care5:1-18, 1997.
19.
19. Personal communication, Emily Tyler, MPH, CHES, former regional health education consultant, North Carolina Department of Health.
20.
20. Halverson PK, Kaluzny AD, McLaughlin CP: Strategies for managing the public’s health: Implications and next steps, in Halverson PK, Kaluzney AD, McLaughlin CP (eds.): Managed Care and Public Health. Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen, 1998, pp. 350-363.
21.
21. Lezin N, Quinn SC, Zaro S, Baer K, Katz M: Perceptions of public health. Public Health Reports113(4):324-330, 1998.
22.
22. American Association for Health Education/Society for Public Health Education: Standards for the Preparation of Graduate-Level Health Educators. Washington, DC, American Association for Health Education/Society for Public Health Education, 1997.
23.
23. Dillman DA: Mail & Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley-Intersciences, 1978.
24.
24. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Assessing Roles, Responsibilities, and Activities in a Managed Care Environment: A Workbook for Local Health Officials (AHCPR Pub. No. 96-0057). Rockville, MD, Lawrence Bartlett, Patricia Hitz, and Renee Simon, 1996.
25.
25. Turnock BJ, Handler A, Dyal WW, Christenson G, Vaughn EH, Rowitz L, Munson JW, Balderson T, Richards TB: Implementing and assessing organizational practices in local health departments. Public Health Reports109(4):478-485, 1994.
27. Minkler M: Ten commitments for community health education. Health Education Research9(4):527-534, 1994.
28.
28. McLaughlin M: Letting the community decide what’s good for it: A new approach in public health. North Carolina Insight15/16(4):64-68, 1995.
29.
29. Sofaer A: Coalitions and Public Health: A Program Manager’s Guide to the Issues. Paper prepared for AIDS Communication Support Project, Contract No. 200-91-0906. Washington, DC, Academy for Educational Development, 1992.
30.
30. Halverson PK, Mays B, Kaluzny AD, House RM: Developing leaders in public health: The role of executive training programs. Journal of Health Administration Education15(2):87-100, 1997.
