Tax increment financing (TIF) has been adopted widely by municipalities in the
United States as an economic development tool. Despite the large number of state
initiatives and TIF's increasing popularity, few statistical studies have been con
ducted to examine the direct effect of the TIF program from an economic perspective.
This article analyzes the effect of TIF plans on property value growth by comparing
pre-TIF to post-TIF property value changes in a first-difference model. The empiri
cal results from a panel of Indiana cities indicate that the TIF program has increased
median owner-occupied housing values in a TIF-adopting city by 11% relative to
what it would have been without TIF. This finding suggests that the TIF program
effectively stimulates property value growth in an entire community.
References
1.
Anderson, J.E.1990. Tax increment financing: Municipal adoption and growthNational Tax Journal43 (2): 155-63.
2.
Anderson, J.E., and R.W. Wassmer.1995. The decision to "bid for business": Municipal behavior in granting property tax abatementsRegional Science and Urban Economics25 (6): 739-57.
3.
Barnow, B., G. Cain, and A. Goldberger.1980. Issues in the analysis of selectivity biasEvaluation Studies5:42-59.
4.
Bartik, T.J.1989. Small business start-ups in the United States: Estimates of the effects of characteristics of statesSouthern Economic Journal55:1004-18.
5.
—. 1990. The market failure approach to regional economic development policyEconomic Development Quarterly4 (4): 361-70.
6.
—. 1991. Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
7.
Bingham, R., E. Hill, and S. White.1990. Financing economic development: An institutional responseLondon: Sage.
8.
Bovaird, T.1992. Local economic development and the cityUrban Studies29 (3-4): 343-68.
9.
Brueckner, J.K.1979. Property values, local public expenditure and economic efficiencyJournal of Public Economics11:223-45.
10.
—. 1982. A test for allocative efficiency in the local public sectorJournal of Public Economics19:311-31.
11.
Burtless, G., and L. Orr.1986. Are classical experiments needed for manpower policy?Journal of Human Resources21:606-39.
12.
Davidson, J.M.1979Tax increment financing as a tool for community redevelopmentJournal of Urban Law56:405-44.
13.
DeBoer, L., K.T. McNamara, and T.G. Gebremedhin .1992. Tax increment financing: An infrastructure funding option in IndianaDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
14.
Deno, K.T.1988. The effect of public capital on manufacturing activityEconomic Journal55 (2): 400-11.
15.
Duffy-Deno, K., and R.W. Eberts.1991. Public infrastructure and regional economic development : A simultaneous equation approachJournal of Urban Economics30:329-43.
16.
Forgey, F.A.1993. Tax increment financing: Equity, effectiveness, and efficiency. In The municipal yearbook, 25-33. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
17.
Gold, S.D.1991. Changes in state government finances in the 1980sNational Tax Journal44:1-20.
18.
Green, G.P., A. Fleischmann, and T.M. Kwong.1996. The effectiveness of local economic development policies in the 1980sSocial Science Quarterly77 (3): 609-25.
19.
Greene, W.H.1993. Econometric analysisNew York : Macmillan.
20.
Greuling, J.E.1987. Tax increment financing: A downtown development toolEconomic Development Review5 (1): 23-27.
21.
Haughwout, A.F.1997. Central city infrastructure investment and suburban house valuesRegional Science and Urban Economics27:199-215.
22.
Heckman, J.J., and V.J. Hotz.1989. Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of manpower trainingJournal of the American Statistical Association84:862-75.
23.
Helms, J.L.1985. The effect of state and local taxes on economic growth: A time series-cross section approachReview of Economics and Statistics67 (4): 574-82.
24.
Huddleston, J.R.1981. Variations in development subsidies under tax increment financingLand Economics57 (3): 373-84.
25.
—. 1982. Local financial dimensions of tax increment financing: A cost revenue analysisPublic Budgeting and Finance2:40-49.
26.
—. 1984. Tax increment financing as a state development policyGrowth and Change15:11-17.
27.
—. 1986. Distribution of development costs under tax increment financingJournal of the American Planning Association52:194-98.
28.
Klemanski, J.1990. Using tax increment financing for urban redevelopment projectsEconomic Development Quarterly4 (1): 23-28.
29.
Lawrence, D.B., and S. Stephenson.1995. The economics and politics of tax increment financingGrowth and Change26:105-37.
30.
Man, J.Y.Forthcoming. Fiscal pressure, tax competition and the adoption of tax increment financingUrban Studies36(7).
31.
Man, J.Y., and M. Bell.1996. The impact of local sales tax on the value of owner-occupied housingJournal of Urban Economics39:114-30.
32.
McHone, W.W.1987. Factors in the adoption of industrial development incentives by statesApplied Economics23:17-29.
33.
Munnell, A.H.1990. Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investmentNew England Economic Review , pp. 3-22.
34.
Oates, W.E.1969. The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesisJournal of Political Economy77 (6): 957-71.
35.
Ó hUallacháin, B., and Satterthwaite, M.A.1992. Sectoral growth patterns at the metropolitan level: An evaluation of economic development incentivesJournal of Urban Economics31:25-58.
36.
Papke, L.E.1994. Tax policy and urban development: Evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone programJournal of Public Economics54 (1): 37-50.
37.
Ritter, K., and K. Oldfield.1990. Testing the effects of tax increment financing in Springfield, Illinois: The assessor's role in determining policy outcomesProperty Tax Journal9 (2): 141-47.
38.
Rosen, K.T.1982. The impact of Proposition 13 on house prices in Northern California: A test of the interjunsdictional capitalization hypothesisJournal of Political Economy90 (1): 191-200.
39.
Voith, R.1993. Changing capitalization of CBD-oriented transportation systemsJournal of Urban Economics33:361-76.
40.
Walzer, N., and J. Gruidl.1992. Local economic development: Perceptions and actions of small city officials m Illinois In Rural community economic development, edited by Norman Walzer, 97-110. New York: Praeger.
41.
Wassmer, R.W.1994. Can local incentives alter the trend in a metropolitan city's economic developmentUrban Studies31:1251-78.
42.
Wasylenko, M., and T. McGuire.1985. Job and taxes: The effect of business climate on states' employment growth ratesNational Tax Journal38:497-512.
43.
Wheaton, W.1977. A bid rent approach to housing demandJournal of Urban Economics4:200-217.
