The child protection process has been characterized by some commentators as being primarily concerned with the scrutiny of mothering. For a variety of reasons, social workers tend to spend relatively little time working with men in families where children are considered to be at risk. Even where a man is considered to be the primary abuser in a family, the usual approach is to concentrate on the mother's “failure to protect” the children. This article presents an analysis of data from an ethnographic study in a child and family social work team in the United Kingdom, which set out to explore this concentration on mothering and avoidance of men. The article outlines some discourses of masculinity in the occupational culture of child protection social work: men as a threat, men as no use, men as irrelevant, men as absent, men as no different from women, and men as better than women. The author's contention is that if injustice to women in social work provision is to be addressed, these gendered constructions of clients have to be made explicit and their implications understood.
Balloch, S. , J. Pahl, and J. McLean. 1998. Working in the social services: Job satisfaction, stress and violence. British Journal of Social Work28:329-350.
2.
Cavanagh, K. , and V. Cree, eds. 1996. Working with men: Feminism and social work. London: Routledge.
3.
Central Council for Education and Training in Social Work . 1991. Rules and requirements for the diploma in social work (Paper no. 30). 2d ed.London: Central Council for Education and Training in Social Work.
4.
Christie, A.1998. Is social work a “non-traditional” occupation for men?British Journal of Social Work28:491-510.
5.
Clatterbaugh, K. 1990. Contemporary perspectives on masculinity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
6.
Collier, R. 1995. Masculinity, law and the family. London: Routledge.
7.
Collier, R. 1998. Masculinities, crime and criminology: Men, heterosexuality and the criminal(ised) other. London, Sage.
8.
Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
9.
Corby, B. 1993. Child abuse: Towards a knowledge base. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
10.
Dartington Social Research Unit . 1995. Child protection: Messages from research. London: HMSO.
11.
Davies, L. , and J. Krane. 1996. Shaking the legacy of mother blaming: No easy task for child welfare. Journal of Progressive Human Services7:3-22.
12.
Edwards, J. 1998. Screening out men, or “has mum changed her washing powder recently?” In Men, gender divisions and welfare, edited by J. Popay, J. Hearn, and J. Edwards. London: Routledge.
13.
Farmer, E. , and M. Owen. 1995. Child protection practice: Private risks and public remedies. London: HMSO.
14.
Featherstone, B. 1997. “I wouldn't do your job!” Women, social work and child abuse. In Mothering and ambivalence, edited by W. Hollway and B. Featherstone. London: Routledge.
15.
Featherstone, B. , and E. Lancaster. 1997. Contemplating the unthinkable: Men who sexually abuse children. Critical Social Policy53:51-71.
16.
Featherstone, B. , and L. Trinder. 1997. Familiar subjects? Domestic violence and child welfare. Child and Family Social Work2:147-159.
17.
Fox-Harding, L. 1997. Perspectives in child care policy. Harlow, UK: Longman.
18.
Graham, H.1993. Feminism and social work education. Issues in Social Work Education11 (2): 48-64.
19.
Hearn, J. 1990. “Child abuse” and “men's violence.” In Taking child abuse seriously, edited by Violence Against Children Study Group. London: Unwin Hyman.
20.
Hearn, J. 1998. Troubled masculinities in social policy discourses: Young men. In Men, gender divisions and welfare, edited by J. Popay, J. Hearn, and J. Edwards. London: Routledge.
21.
Hearn, J. , and W. Parkin. 1987. “Sex” at “work.” The power and paradox of organisation sexuality. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf.
22.
Jordan, B.1991. Competencies and values. Social Work Education10:5-11.
23.
Kelly, L. , L. Regan, and S. Burton. 1991. An exploratory study of the prevalence of sexual abuse in a sample of 16-21 year olds. London: Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, University of North London.
24.
Lindsay, D. 1994. The welfare of children. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Lupton, D. , and L. Barclay. 1997. Constructing fatherhood: Discourses and experiences. London: Sage.
26.
Maynard, M. 1985. The response of social workers to domestic violence. In Private violence and public policy, edited by J. Pahl. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
27.
Middleton, P. 1992. The inward gaze: Masculinity and subjectivity in modern culture. London: Routledge.
28.
Milner, J.1993. A disappearing act: The differing career paths of fathers and mothers in child protection investigations. Critical Social Policy38:48-63.
29.
Mullender, A.1997. Domestic violence and social work: The challenge to change. Critical Social Policy50:53-78.
30.
Munro, E.1998. Improving social workers' knowledge base in child protection work. British Journal of Social Work28:89-105.
31.
Murray, C. 1990. The emerging British underclass. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit.
32.
O'Hagan, K.1997. The problem of engaging men in child protection. British Journal of Social Work27:25-42.
33.
O'Hagan, K. , and K. Dillenburger. 1995. The abuse of women within childcare work. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
34.
Parton, N. 1991. Governing the family: Childcare, child protection and the state. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
35.
Parton, N. , D. Thorpe, and C. Wattam. 1997. Child protection: Risk and the moral order. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
36.
Pringle, K. 1995. Men, masculinities and social welfare. London: UCL Press.
37.
Scott, D.1998. A qualitative study of social work assessment in cases of alleged child abuse. British Journal of Social Work28:73-88.
38.
Scourfield, J. B. 1999. The construction of gender in child protection social work. Ph.D. thesis, Cardiff University, UK.
39.
Stainton Rogers, R. , and W. Stainton Rogers. 1992. Stories of childhood: Shifting agendas of child concern. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
40.
Swift, K. 1995. Manufacturing “bad mothers”: A critical perspective on child neglect. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
41.
Turner, J. 1998. Talking shock tactics. The Guardian, 26 May, sec. 2, pp. 6-7.
42.
White, S. 1997. Performing social work: An ethnographic study of talk and text in a metropolitan social services department. Salford, UK: University of Salford.
43.
White, S. 1998a. From realism to relativism and back (via the body) to pragmatism and common sense: An ethnographer's personal journey. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Sociological Association, University of Edinburgh, UK, April.
44.
White, S.1998b. Interdiscursivity and child welfare: The ascent and durability of psycho-legalism. The Sociological Review46:264-292.
45.
Williams, F. 1998. Troubled masculinities in social policy discourses: Fatherhood. In Men, gender divisions and welfare, edited by J. Popay, J. Hearn, and J. Edwards. London: Routledge.
