Abstract

To the Editor,
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory condition associated with substantial impairment of quality of life. 1 Disease control ‘on drug’ is now achievable with effective systemic immunomodulatory therapies, including interleukin-4 (IL-4)/IL-13 pathway antagonists and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). 2 However, it is unclear whether control is sustainable ‘off drug’ – this is important given immunomodulatory therapies carry risks of adverse events. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the duration of sustained disease control in AD following discontinuation of systemic immunomodulatory therapy.
This review followed Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42024548153). 3 MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to January 8, 2025 (Supplementary Table 1). Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies enrolling adults (≥18 years) with AD who discontinued systemic immunomodulators after achieving disease control were included. Outcomes were maintenance of ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) or Investigator Global Assessment 0/1. Studies investigating conventional immunosuppressants, biologics, and small-molecule therapies were eligible. Studies exploring oral corticosteroids, dual systemic therapy, paediatric populations, and unadjusted cohorts were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, reflecting the observational nature of post hoc remission cohorts, and certainty was graded using GRADE.4,5
From 13 397 records, 9 studies (8 RCT, 1 cohort; n = 2558 participants) met inclusion criteria (Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Appendix 1). Therapies included dupilumuab, tralokinumab, amlitelimab, rocatinlimab, rezpegaldesleukin, abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib (Supplementary Table 2). No eligible studies assessing conventional systemic immunosuppressants were identified. Treatment duration pre-discontinuation ranged from 12 to 54.8 weeks; follow-up post-discontinuation ranged from 4 to 36 weeks (Supplementary Figure 2). Definitions of disease control and relapse varied considerably, as did concomitant use of topical therapy.
Among IL-4/IL-13 antagonists, approximately one-third of participants who achieved EASI-75 at week 16 maintained EASI-75 at 36 weeks after discontinuation (dupilumab 40.4%; tralokinumab 26.4%), substantially lower than continuation arms (dupilumuab 71.6%; tralokinumab 57.3%). In a small dupilumab cohort treated for a mean 54.6 weeks, 68.2% maintained disease control for a mean 40.5 weeks after cessation, although risk of bias was high (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4).
OX40 pathway antagonists demonstrated greater durability: 61.6% maintained EASI-75 at 28 weeks after amlitelimab withdrawal, and Kaplan-Meier estimates suggested 73% to 96% probability of maintaining EASI-75 at 20 weeks following rocatinlimab cessation. In a small trial of the IL-2 agonist rezpegaldesleukin, 71.4% to 80% of responders maintained disease control at 36 weeks post-withdrawal.
JAKis were associated with more rapid loss of control. At 16 weeks after baricitinib cessation, 45.2% maintained EASI-75, whilst only ~20% maintained EASI-75 after upadacitinib withdrawal. Shorter-term maintenance was observed at 4 weeks after abrocitinib cessation (EASI-75: 42.3%). Retreatment was generally effective, with most participants regaining response.
Overall certainty of evidence was very low due to heterogeneity in treatment duration, remission definitions, follow-up, and incomplete outcome reporting. Despite these limitations, targeted biologics appeared to induce more durable post-treatment control than small molecules. Prospective studies evaluating withdrawal and dose-reduction strategies, alongside non-drug patient-level predictors of remission (such as disease duration and comorbidities), are needed to inform shared decision-making in AD.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-cms-10.1177_12034754261455682 – Supplemental material for Can Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy Induce Remission of Atopic Dermatitis? A Systematic Review
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cms-10.1177_12034754261455682 for Can Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy Induce Remission of Atopic Dermatitis? A Systematic Review by David Gleeson, John Y. W. Lee, Noor Leelo, Manpreet K. Sagoo, Weiyu Ye, Ravi Ramessur, Andrew E. Pink, Satveer K. Mahil and Catherine H. Smith in Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
Footnotes
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study is supported through funding from sources including the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR; NIHR302258). Professor Catherine Smith is an NIHR Senior Investigator. This research was supported by the King’s Health Partners Centre for Translational Medicine. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of King’s Health Partners.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: D.G. has received educational support from Eli Lilly. A.E.P. is an advisory board member, investigator for, received grants from, or received educational support from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, La Roche-Posay, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and UCB. S.K.M. reports departmental income from AbbVie, Almirall, Eli Lilly, Leo, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, outside the submitted work. C.H.S. reports departmental research funding as an investigator in EU-IMI consortia involving multiple industry partners (see biomap-imi.eu and hippocrates-imi.eu for details). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Data Availability Statement
All data included in this systematic review are available from the original published articles. Template data collection forms and data extracted from included studies are available upon suitable request from the authors.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
