AngIen1991, Desperately Seeking the Audience, Routledge, London.
2.
ArlenMichael, 1982, living-mom War, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
3.
Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 1987, A Female Audience Development Study, Prosumer Services, Sydney.
4.
BellPhilip, 1993, Multicultural Australia in the Media, A report to the Office of Multicultural Affairs, AGPS, Canberra.
5.
ClaisseGRoweF, 1987, ‘The telephone in question: Questions on communications’Computer Networks and ISDN Systems24, 207–219.
6.
DenzinN, 1992, Symbolic Interactionism and Cultural Studies, Blackwell, USA.
7.
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, 1993, The Missing Story. A Gender Study of Media Content, Office of the Status of Women, AGPS, Canberra.
8.
GillardPBowMWaleK, 1994, A Major line to the Outside World From the House, Telecommunications Needs Research Group, RMIT, Melbourne.
9.
HardtH, 1992, Critical Communication Studies, Routledge, London.
10.
KellerS, 1977, The Telephone in New (and Old) Communities', in ed de Sola PoolI, The Social Impact of the Telephone, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
11.
LauerR HHandelW H, 1977, Social Psychology. The Theory and Application of Symbolic Interactionism, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
12.
LindlofThomas R, 1991, ‘The qualitative study of media audiences’Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media35, 23–42
13.
MorleyD, 1986, Family Television. Cultural Pouter and Domestic Leisure, Comedia, London.
14.
MorleyDSilverstoneR, 1991, ‘Communication and context: Ethnographic perspectives on the media audience’ in eds, JensenK BJankowskiN W, A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research, Routledge, London.
15.
MoyalA, 1992, ‘The gendered use of the telephone: An Australian case study’Media, Culture and Society14, 51–72.
16.
MurrayG, 1994, ‘How's the World been Treating You?' Telecommunications Cultures and the Autonomous Call’, Telecommunications Needs Research Group, RMTT, Melbourne.
17.
NobleGrant, 1987, ‘Discriminating between the intrinsic and instrumental domestic telephone user’Australian Journal of Communication11, 63–68.
18.
PalmerP, 1986a, Girls and Television, New South Wales Ministry of Education, Sydney.
19.
PalmerP, 1986b, The Lively Audience, Allen and Unwin, Sydney.
20.
PoolI S, ed, 1977, The Social Impact of the Telephone, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
21.
RakowL F, 1987, Gender on the Line. Women, the Telephone and Community Life, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
22.
RakowL FNavarroV, 1993, ‘Remote Mothering and the Parallel Shift: Women Meet the Cellular Phone’Critical Studies in Mass Communication10, 144–157.
23.
ShieldsPeterDervinBrenda, (in preparation) The Telephone in the Eye of the Beholder User Perspectives Uses, Assessments.
24.
SilverstoneRHirschE, eds, 1992, Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, Routledge, London.
25.
SkeltonFiona, 1989, ‘Teenagers and the telephone’Australian Journal of Communication15, 21–24.
26.
SpradleyJ PMcCurdyD W, 1972, The Cultural Experience. Ethnography in a Complex Society, SRA, Chicago.
WilliamsonK, 1993, ‘Drinks on the phone at five o'clock’. Telecommunications and the information and Communication Needs of Older Adults, Telecommunications Needs Research Group, RMTT, Melbourne.