Moving Experience: Dialogues between Personal Cultural Positions

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is to study the dialogical dynamics of people with multicultural experiences, a response to the call voiced by Hermans (2001a) to explore the self on the contact zones of culture. Using the theory of the dialogical self as a starting point, I explore in my empirical research the hypothesis that a dialogue between personal cultural positions allows new meanings to arise in the personal meaning system. Acculturation can thus be seen as a continuing process of self-innovation propelled by dialogues between personal cultural positions. Thirteen multicultural individuals (global nomads) were asked if they could identify personal cultural positions and conduct a dialogue between them. Each step in the dialogue was rated on a five-point scale measuring novelty, importance and authenticity. Results show that in the majority of cases novelty ratings increased, confirming the hypothesis. Stable novelty ratings occurred when initial statements were rated high on importance and/or authenticity, indicating that acculturation occurs within the field of tension created by the desire to maintain personal continuity, on the one hand, and self-innovation to facilitate integration into a new environment, on the other. This research is aimed at devising a suitable methodology for assessment and coaching of multicultural individuals.

Keywords

acculturation dialogical self personal cultural positions self-innovation

References

Adams, G. , & Markus, H.R. (2001). Culture as patterns: An alternative approach to the problem of reification. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 283-296.

Akhtar, S.A. (1995). A third individuation: Immigration, identity and the psychoanalytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytical Association, 43, 1051-1084.

Bakhtin, M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics (2nd ed.; R.W. Rotsel, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI : Ardis. (Original work published in 1929.)

Bennet, J.M. (1993). Cultural marginality: Identity issues in intercultural training. In R.M. Page (Ed.), Education for intercultural experience (2nd ed.; pp. 109-135). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

Berry, J.W. (1999). Acculturation. In M.H. Segall , P.R. Dasen , J.W. Berry , & Y.H. Poortinga (pp. 299-323), Human behaviour in global perspective. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Bhatia, S. , & Ram, A. (2001). Rethinking `acculturation' in relation to diasporic cultures and postcolonial identities. Human Development, 44,1-18.

Bruner, J.S. (1990). Acts of meaning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Damon, W. , & Hart, D. (1982). The development of self understanding from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 4, 841-864.

Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self and culture. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

10.

Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor /Doubleday.

11.

Hermans, H.J.M. (1999). Dialogical thinking and self-innovation. Culture & Psychology, 5(1), 67-87.

12.

Hermans, H.J.M. (2001a). Mixing and moving cultures require a dialogical self. Human Development, 44, 24-28.

13.

Hermans, H.J.M. (2001b). The dialogical self: Towards a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243-283.

14.

Hermans, H.J.M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind: Introduction . Theory & Psychology,12(2), 147-160.

15.

Hermans, H.J.M. , & Kempen, H.J.G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

16.

James, W. ( 1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.

17.

Josephs, I.E. (2002). `The Hopi in me': The construction of a voice in the dialogical self from a cultural psychological perspective. Theory & Psychology, 12(2),161-173.

18.

La Fromboise, T. , Coleman, H.L.K. , & Gerton, J. (1993). Psychological impact of biculturalism: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 395-412.

19.

Lawrence, T.E. (1962). Seven pillars of wisdom. Harmondsworth : Penguin.

20.

Marková, I. (1987). On the interaction of opposites in psychological processes. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17, 279-299.

21.

Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Pollock, D.C. , & van Reken, R.E. (1999). The third culture kid experience . Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press .

23.

Sarbin, T.R. (1986). The narrative as a root metaphor for psychology . In T.R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 3-21). New York: Praeger.

24.

Schaetti, B.F. , & Ramsey, S.J. (1999b). The global nomad experience: Living in liminality . Mobility, 20(9), 40-45.

25.

Seelye, H.N. , & Wasilewski, J.H. (1996). Between cultures, developing self identity in a world of diversity. Chicago, IL: NTC Business Books.

26.

Useem, J. , Useem, R. , & Downie, R.D. (1967).Third culture kids. Today's Education (September-October), 103-105.

27.

Wertsch, J.V. (1991).Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.