As theoretical models of policy processes have become more ambitious, scholars have been relying more and more frequently on the policy positions of the relevant actors. Different methods are feasible in deriving these policy positions, but few have been applied to the Swiss parties. In this article, we offer estimates of policy positions for the Swiss political parties using various methods. Our main goal is to assess changes over time of these positions. On comparing the estimates obtained by the various methods, we offer insights on which estimates are preferable and in what contexts. Given the particular characteristics of the Swiss political system, namely a federal country with a non-parliamentary system of government, we also assess the degree to which the Swiss federal parties are unified.
Andrews, Josephine T. (2002) When Majorities Fail: The Russian Legislature, 1990—1993. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Armingeon, Klaus (1998) `Es gibt sie doch, die Schweizer Wahlen! Die Unterschiedlichkeit des Wahlverhaltens zwischen Kantonen im internationalen Vergleich', in Hanspeter Kriesi, Wolf Linder and Ulrich Klöti (eds) Schweizer Wahlen 1995, pp. 273—95. Bern: Haupt.
3.
Ayberk, Ural, Matthias Finger, Carlos Garcia and Pascal Sciarini (1991) Les partis politiques à coeur ouvert. Lausanne: Loisirs et Pédagogie .
4.
Benoit, Kenneth and Michael Laver (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
5.
Brändle, Michael (1999) `Konkordanz gleich Konvergenz? Die Links-Rechts-Positionierung der Schweizer Bundesratsparteien', Revue suisse de science politique5: 11—29.
6.
Budge, Ian (2001) `Validating the Manifesto Research Group Approach: Theoretical Assumptions and Empirical Confirmations', in Michael Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors, pp. 50—65. London: Routledge.
7.
Budge, Ian, D. Robertson and Derek Hearl (eds) ( 1987) Ideology, Strategy and Party Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Volkens Andrea and Judi Bara (eds) (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments , 1945—1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
Budge, Ian and Judith Bara (2001) `Manifesto-Based Research: A Critical Review', in Ian Budge, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Volkens Andrea and Judi Bara (eds) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945—1998, pp. 51—73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Carrubba, Clifford J. and Matthew Gabel (1999) `Roll-Call Votes and Party Discipline in the European Parliament: Reconsidering MEP Voting Behavior'. Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 2—5 September, Atlanta.
11.
Carrubba, Clifford J., Matthew Gabel, Lacey Murrah, Ryan Clough, Elizabeth Montegomery and Rebecca Schambach (2006) `Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias, and Roll-Call Vote Analysis', British Journal of Political Science36: 691—704.
12.
Castles, Francis G. and Peter Mair (1984) `Left—Right Political Scales: Some “Expert” Judgements', European Journal of Political Research12: 73—88.
13.
Castles, Francis G. and Peter Mair (1997) `Left—Right Political Scales', European Journal of Political Research31: 147—57.
14.
Clinton, Joshua D., Simon Jackman and Doug Rivers ( 2004) `The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Voting: A Unified Approach', American Political Science Review98: 355—70.
15.
Finger, Matthias and Pascal Sciarini (1991) `Integrating “New Politics” into “Old Politics”: The Swiss Party Elite', West European Politics14: 98—112.
16.
Finger, Matthias and Simon Hug ( 1992) `Green Politics in Switzerland: Environmental Attitudes and Political Parties', European Journal of Political Research21: 289—306.
17.
Gabel, Matthew J. and Clifford J. Carrubba (2004) `The European Parliament and Transnational Political Representation: Party Groups and Political Conflict' , Europäische Politik, http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/02609.pdf
18.
Gabel, Matthew J. and John D. Huber (2000) `Putting Parties in their Place: Inferring Party Left—Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data', American Journal of Political Science44: 94—103.
19.
Heckman, James J. and James M. Snyder Jr. (1997) `Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators', Rand Journal of Economics28 (0 special issue): S142—89.
20.
Hermann, Michael, Heiri Leuthold and Hanspeter Kriesi (1999) `Die politische Landkarte der Schweiz', Das Magazin40 (9.10.1999).
21.
Huber, John and Ronald Inglehart (1995) `Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies', Party Politics1: 73—111.
22.
Hug, Simon (1994) `La cohésion des partis fédéraux dans la phase référendaire', in Yannis Papadopoulos (ed.) Elites politiques et peuple. Analyse des votations féérales 1970—1987 , pp. 85—112. Lausanne: Réalités sociales.
23.
Hug, Simon (2005) `Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes'. Mimeo. Universität Zürich.
24.
Jeitziner, Bruno and Tobias Hohl ( 1997) `Measuring Political Preferences: Ratings for Members of the Swiss National Council', Revue Suisse de SciencePolitique3: 1—27.
25.
Jeitziner, Bruno and Tobias Hohl (2002) `Links und Rechts vor dem Wahljahr 2003: Die Nationalräte im Parlamentarier-Rating', Neue Zürcher Zeitung281 (3 December): 15.
26.
Jones, Bradford S. and Barbara Norrander (1996) `The Reliability of Aggregated Public Opinion Measures ', American Journal of Political Science40: 295—309.
27.
Kerr, Henry H. (1981) Parlement et société enSuisse . Saint-Saphorin: Editions Georgi .
28.
Klöti, Ulrich (1998) `Kantonale Parteiensysteme — Bedeutung des kantonalen Kontexts für die Positionierung der Parteien', in Hanspeter Kriesi, Wolf Linder and Ulrich Klöti (eds) Schweizer Wahlen 1995, pp. 45—72. Bern: Haupt.
29.
Kriesi, Hanspeter (2001) `The Federal Parliament: The Limits of Institutional Reform', West European Politics24: 59—76.
30.
Ladha, Krishna K. (1991) `A Spatial Model of Legislative Voting With Perceptual Error', Public Choice68: 151—74.
31.
Ladner, Andreas (1999) `Das Schweizer Parteiensystem und seine Parteien ', in Ulrich Klöti, Peter Knoepfel, Hanspeter Kriesi, Wolf Linder and Yannis Papadopoulos (eds) Handbuch der Schweizer Politik , pp. 213—60. Zürich: Verlag Neue Zücher Zeitung.
32.
Ladner, Andreas (2001) `Swiss Political Parties: Between Persistence and Change', West European Politics24: 123—44.
33.
Ladner, Andreas and Michael Brändle (2001) Die Schweizer Parteien im Wandel. Von Mitgliederparteien zu professionalisierten Wählerorganisationen? Zürich: Seismo.
34.
Laver, Michael (2001a) `How Should We Estimate the Policy Positions of Political Actors?' in Michael Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors, pp. 239—44. London: Routledge.
35.
Laver, Michael (2001b) `Why Should We Estimate the Policy Positions of Political Actors?' in Michael Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors, pp. 3—9. London: Routledge.
36.
Laver, Michael and Ben Hunt (1992) Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge.
37.
Laver, Michael, Kenneth Benoit and John Garry (2003) `Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data', American Political Science Review97: 311—31.
38.
Londregan, John (2000) `Estimating Legislator's Preferred Points', PoliticalAnalysis8: 35—56.
39.
Longchamp, Claude (2003) `Sachpolitische Information in Wahlkampfzeiten ', Neue Zürcher Zeitung42 (20 February), p. 15.
40.
Mair, Peter (2001) `Searching for the Positions of Political Actors: A Review of Approaches and a Critical Evaluation of Expert Surveys', in Michael Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors, pp. 10—30. London: Routledge.
41.
Martin, Andrew D. and Kevin M. Quinn (2002) `Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation Via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. SupremeCourt, 1953—1999', Political Analysis10: 134—53.
42.
Noury, Abdul G. and Elena Mielcova (1997) `Roll Call Voting in a Multi-Party Parliament: The Case of the Czech Parliament'. Mimeo. Free University of Brussels, Belgium.
43.
Park, David K., Andrew Gelman and Joseph Bafumi (2002) `State-Level Opinions from National Surveys: Poststratification Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression'. Paper prepared for the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Conference , Seattle, WA.
44.
Poole, Keith (2000) `Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data', PoliticalAnalysis8: 211—37.
45.
Poole, Keith T. (2001) `The Geometry of Multidimensional Quadratic Utility in Models of Parliamentary Roll Call Voting', PoliticalAnalysis9: 211—26.
46.
Poole, Keith (2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Poole, Keith and Howard Rosenthal (1985) `A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis', American Journal of Political Science29: 357—84.
48.
Poole, Keith A. and Howard Rosenthal (1997) Congress. A Political—Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
Rosenthal, Howard and Erik Voeten ( 2004) `Analyzing Roll Calls with Perfect Spatial Voting', American Journal of Political Science48: 620—32.
50.
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl (2003) `Ideology, Party and Interests in the British Parliament of 1841—1847', British Journal of Political Science33: 581—605.
51.
Volkens, Andrea (2001) `Manifesto Research Since 1979: From Reliability to Validity', in Michael Laver (ed.) Estimating the Policy Position of Political Actors, pp. 33—49. London: Routledge.
52.
Von Wyss, Moritz (2003) `Die Namenabstimmung im Ständerat: Untersuchung eines parlamentarischen Mythos', in Isabelle Häner (ed.) Nachdenken über den demokratischen Staat und seine Geschichte. Beiträge für Alfred Kölz, pp. 23—47. Zürich: Schulthess.
