The use of short message services (SMS) on mobile phones has gained huge popularity in most western and many developing countries — so much so that it has become established as the preferred medium for mobile communication especially among young people. This article explores SMS as used for discreet communication between people in the same physical space (‘shared physical space SMS’ — or ‘SPS-SMS’). Drawing from semi-structured interviews with young people in Norway, 10 different scenarios of SPS-SMS use are explored and analysed within an interactionist framework. These sites of SPS-SMS are presented here as ‘communicative affordances’. It is concluded that the mobile phone, by the application of SPS-SMS, affords communicative layers of transparency, by which various SMS users maintain semi-synchronous communication, both for care and coordination. Although a qualitative study of this nature does not lend itself to generalizations about SPS-SMS communication, it does demonstrate how detailed studies of extraordinary uses of mediated communication may be used to widen analyses of social interaction.
Ackroyd S. and Hughes JA ( 1992) Data Collection in Context. Harlow : Longman Group.
2.
Akrich M. ( 1992) The De-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker WE and Law J (eds) Shaping Technology - Building Society. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 205-224.
3.
Bell G. ( 2006) No more SMS from Jesus: Ubicomp, religion and techno-spiritual practices. In: Dourish P and Friday A (eds) Ubicomp. BerlinHeidelberg: Springer-Verlag , 141-158.
4.
Berg S., Taylor AS and Harper R. ( 2005) Gift of the gab. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 271-285.
5.
Caron AH and Caronia L. ( 2007) Moving Cultures: Mobile Communication in Everyday Life . Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
6.
Caronia L. and Caron AH ( 2004) Constructing a specific culture: Young people’s use of the mobile phone as a social performance. Convergence10(2): 28-61.
7.
Castells M., Fernández-Ardèvol M., Qiu JL and Sey A. (2006) Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
8.
Cheverest K., Dix A., Fitton D., Friday A. and Rouncefield M. ( 2003) Exploring the utility of remote messaging and situated office door displays. In: Chittaro L (ed) MobileCHI. Berlin and Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag, 336-341.
9.
Cheverest K., Fitton D. and Rouncefield M. ( 2005) Working text: Texting work. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 253-269.
10.
Coutts R., Coutts P. and Alport K. ( 2005) Understanding the user within the innovation spiral . In: Krogstie J, Kautz K and Allen D (eds) Mobile Information Systems II. New York: Springer, 47-62.
11.
Delanty G. ( 2003) Community. London: Routledge.
12.
de Souza e Silva A. ( 2004) Mobile networks and public spaces: Bringing multiuser environments into the physical space. Convergence10(2): 15-25.
13.
Dingwall R. ( 1997) Accounts, interviews and observations. In: Miller G and Dingwall R (eds) Context & Method in Qualitative Research . London: SAGE, 51-65.
14.
Elwood-Clayton B. ( 2005) Desire and loathing in the cyber Philippines. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 195-219.
15.
Fortunati L. ( 2002) Italy: Stereotypes, true and false. In: Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 42-62.
16.
Garcia-Montes JM, Caballero-Munoz D. and Perez-Alvarez M. ( 2006) Changes in the self resulting from the use of mobile phones . Media Culture & Society28(1): 67-82.
17.
Gergen KJ ( 2002) The challenge of absent presence. In: Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 227-241.
18.
Gibson JJ ( 1979) The Ecological Approach to Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
19.
Giddens A. ( 1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge : Polity Press.
20.
Goffman E. ( 1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
21.
Goffman E. ( 1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior . New York: Anchor Books. Goffman E. ( 1971) Relations in Public. Microstudies of the Public Order . London: Allen Lane.
22.
Goffman E. ( 1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
23.
Gordon J. ( 2002) The mobile phone: An artefact of popular culture and a tool of the public sphere. Convergence8(3): 15-26.
24.
Gordon J. ( 2007) The mobile phone and the public sphere: Mobile phone usage in three critical situations. Convergence13(3): 307-319.
25.
Grazian D. ( 2007) The girl hunt: Urban nightlife and the performance of masculinity as collective activity. Symbolic Interaction30(2): 221-243.
26.
Grinter RE and Eldridge M. ( 2001) Y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg? In: Prinz W, Jarke M , Rogers Y, Schmidt K and Wulf V (eds) Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), Bonn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 219-238.
27.
Grinter RE and Eldridge M. ( 2003) Wan2tlk?: Everyday text messaging. Paper presented at CHI 2003, 5-10 April, Ft Lauderdale, Florida USA.
28.
Grinter RE, Palen L. and Eldridge M. ( 2006) Chatting with teenagers: Considering the place of chat technologies in teen life. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction13(4): 423-447.
29.
Hård af Segerstad Y. ( 2005) Language in SMS - a sosio-linguistic view. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 33-51.
30.
Hjorth L. ( 2005) Locating mobility: Practices of co-presence and the persistence of the postal metaphor in SMS/MMS mobile phone customization in Melbourne . Fibreculture Journal (6). URL (consulted February 2010): http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue6/
31.
Hjorth L. ( 2008) Being real in the mobile reel. Convergence14(1): 91-104.
32.
Hjorth L. and Kim H. ( 2005) Being there and being here: Gendered customising of mobile 3G practices through a case study in Seoul. Convergence11(2): 49-55.
33.
Höflich JR and Gebhardt J. ( 2005) Changing cultures of written communication: Letter - E-mail - SMS. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 9-31.
34.
Hutchby I. ( 2001a) Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology35(2): 441-456.
35.
Hutchby I. ( 2001b) Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press .
36.
Hutchby I. ( 2003) Affordances and the analysis of technologically mediated interaction: A response to Brian Rappert. Sociology37(3): 581-589.
37.
Ito M. and Okabe D. ( 2005a) Intimate connections: Contextualising Japanese youth and mobile messaging. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 127-145.
38.
Ito M. and Okabe D. ( 2005b) Technosocial situations: Emergent structurings of mobile email use. In: Ito M, Okabe D and Matsuda M (eds) Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life. Cambridge: MIT Press , 257-273.
39.
Jenson S. ( 2005) Default thinking: Why consumer products fail. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 305-324.
40.
Jones M. and Marsden G. ( 2004) ‘Please turn ON your mobile phone’ - First impression on text-messaging in lectures. In: Brewster S and Dunlop M (eds) MobileHCI. BerlinHeidelberg : Springer-Verlag, 436-440.
41.
Kaare BH, Brandtzaeg PB, Heim J. and Endestad T. ( 2007) In the borderland between family orientation and peer culture: the use of communication technologies among Norwegian tweens . New Media & Society9(4), 603-624.
42.
Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) (2002) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Kendon A. ( 1988) Goffman’s approach to face-to-face interaction . In: Drew P and Wotton A (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 14-40.
44.
Keyani P. and Farnham S. ( 2005) Swarm: Text messaging designed to enhance social coordination . In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 287-304.
45.
Kim SD ( 2002) Korea: personal meanings. In: Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 63-79.
46.
Knoblauch H. ( 2006) Videography. Focused ethnography and video analysis . In: Knoblauch H, Schnettler B, Raab J and Soeffner H-G (eds) Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audovisual Data Analysis in Sociology. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 69-83.
47.
Kopomaa T. ( 2005) The breakthrough of text messaging in Finland. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 147-159.
48.
Lacohée H., Wakeford N. and Pearson I. ( 2003) A social history of the mobile telephone with a view of its future. BT Technology Journal21(3): 203-211.
49.
Lai TL ( 2004) Service quality and perceived values impact on satisfaction, intention and usage of short message service (SMS). Information Systems Frontiers6(4): 353-368.
50.
Latour B. ( 1987) Science in Action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Laursen D. ( 2005) Please reply! The replying norm in adolescent SMS communication . In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 53-73.
52.
Lave J. and Wenger E. ( 1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Lehtonen T-K ( 2003) The domestication of new technologies as a set of trials . Journal of Consumer Culture3(3): 363-385.
54.
Levinson SC ( 1988) Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In: Drew P and Wootton AA (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge : Polity Press, 161-227.
55.
Licoppe C. and Heurtin J-P ( 2002) France: Preserving the image. In: Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 94-109.
56.
Lie M and Sørensen KL (eds) (1996) Making Technology Our Own: Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
57.
Lin A. ( 2005) Gendered, bilingual communication practices Mobile test-messaging among Hong Kong college students. Fibreculture Journal (6). URL (consulted February 2010): http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue6/
58.
Ling R. ( 2001) ‘We release them little by little’: Maturation and gender identity as seen in the use of mobile telephony. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing5(2): 123-136.
59.
Ling R. ( 2004) The adoption, use and social consequences of mobile communication . Telektronikk3: 1-13.
60.
Ling R. ( 2005) Mobile communication vis-à-vis teen emancipation, peer group integration and deviance. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 175-193.
61.
Ling R. and Yttri B. ( 2002) Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway . In: Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139-169.
62.
Ling R., Julsrud T. and Yttri B. ( 2005) Nascent communication genres within SMS and MMS . In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 75-100.
63.
Merton R.K. and Kendall PL ( 1946) The focused interview. The American Journal of Sociology51(6): 541-557.
64.
Nathwani K. and Eason K. ( 2005) Perceptions versus expectations of multimedia messaging service (MMS). Personal and Ubiquitous Computing9(4): 191-197.
65.
Nicholson JA ( 2005) Flash! Mobs in the age of mobile connectivity. Fibreculture Journal (6). URL (consulted February 2010): http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue6/
66.
Oksman V. and Turtiainen J. ( 2004) Mobile communication as a social stage: Meanings of mobile communication in everyday life among teenagers in Finland. New Media & Society6(3): 319-339.
67.
Olofsson S. and Pettersson M. ( 2005) Design for richer reachability: Mobile inspection in building maintenance. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 237-252.
68.
Oudshoorn N. and Pinch TJ ( 2003) How users and non-users matter. In: Oudshoorn N and Pinch TJ (eds) How Users Matter. The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1-25.
69.
Pinch TJ and Bijker WE ( 1987) The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP and Pinch TJ (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems . Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 17-50.
70.
Prøitz L. ( 2005) Cute boys or game boys? The embodiment of femininity and masculinity in young Norwegians’ text message love-projects. Fibreculture Journal (6). URL (consulted February 2010): http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue6/
71.
Puro J-P. ( 2002) Finland: a mobile culture. In: Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19-29.
72.
Rapley T. ( 2004) Interviews. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF and Silverman D (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London: SAGE, 15-33.
73.
Rappert B. ( 2003) Technologies, texts and possibilities: A reply to Hutchby , Sociology37(3): 565-580.
74.
Reid DJ and Reid FJM ( 2005) Textmates and text circles: Insights into the social ecology of SMS text messaging. In: Hamill L and Lasen A (eds) Mobile World. Past, Present and Future. London: Springer, 105-118.
75.
Rettie R.(2009) Mobile phone communication: Extending Goffman to mediated interaction . Sociology43(3): 421-438.
76.
Richardson I. ( 2005) Mobile technosoma: Some phenomenological reflections on itinerant media devices. Fibreculture Journal (6). URL (consulted February 2010): http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue6/
77.
Riviére CA and Licoppe C. ( 2005) From voice to text: Continuity and change in the use of mobile phones in France and Japan. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 103-126.
78.
Rizzo S. ( 2008) The promise of cell phones: From people power to technological nanny. Convergence14(2): 135-143.
79.
Schejter A. and Cohen A. ( 2002) Israel: Chutzpah and chatter in the Holy Land. In: Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30-41.
80.
Schneider-Hufschmidt M. ( 2005) Usability issues of sending text messages. In: Harper R, Palen L and Taylor A (eds) The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer, 223-236.
81.
Silverstone R and Hirsch E (eds) (1992) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge.
82.
Skog B. ( 2002) Mobiles and the Norwegian teen: Identity, gender and class . In: Katz JE and Aakhus M (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 255-273.
83.
Skog B. ( 2003) [MMS - Mobile with Smile] :-). Department of Sociology and Political Science, Report 69. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
84.
Statistics-Norway (2007) Use of electronic services telephone calls and SMS an average day. Whole Country. 2006. Oslo: Statistics-Norway (SSB).
85.
Taylor AS and Harper R. ( 2002) Age-old practices in the ‘New World’: A study of gift-giving between teenage mobile phone users. Paper presented at Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 02 . Minneapolis: ACM Press .
86.
Taylor AS and Harper R. ( 2003) The gift of the gab? A design-oriented sociology of young people’s use of mobiles. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work12(3): 267-296.
87.
Taylor AS and Vincent J. ( 2005) An SMS history. In: Hamill L and Lasen A (eds) Mobile World. Past, Present and Future. London : Springer, 75-91.
88.
Thomas WI and Thomas D. ( 1928) The child in America: Behavior problems and programs . New York: Knopf.
89.
Thulin E. and Vilhelmson B. ( 2007) Mobiles everywhere: Youth, the mobile phone, and changes in everyday practice. Young15(3): 235-253.
90.
Tjora AH(2009) The groove in the box: A technologically-mediated inspiration in electronic dance music. Popular Music28(2): 161-177.
91.
Tjora AH ( 2010) [Qualitative Research Methods in Practice] with the parantheses Den 18. feb. 2011 kl. 17.54 skrev SageproductionOslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
92.
Tutt D. ( 2005) Mobile performances of a teenager: A study of situated mobile phone activity in the living room. Convergence11(2): 58-75.
93.
Weilenmann A. ( 2003) Doing mobility. Doctoral dissertation at the Department of Informatics. Göteborg: Göteborg University.
94.
Wetherell M. ( 2001) Minds, selves and S-making. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S and Yates SJ (eds) Discourse Theory and Practice . London: SAGE, 186-197.
95.
Wilken R. ( 2005) From stabilitas loci to mobilitas loci: Networked mobility and the transformation of place. Fibreculture Journal (6). URL (consulted February 2010 ): http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue6/
