HartKHanIDeppeG. Postoperative radiation for cervical cancer with pathological risk factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1997; 37: 833–838
2.
MorrisMEifelPJLuJ. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Eng J Med1999; 340: 1137–1143
3.
KeysHMBundyBNStehmanFB. Cisplatin, radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Eng J Med1999; 340: 1154–1161
4.
RosePGBundyBNWatkinsEB. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Eng J Med1999; 340: 1144–1153
PedersonDBentzenSMOvergaardJ. Early and late radiotherapeutic morbidity in 442 consecutive patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1994; 29: 941–952
7.
ChassagneDSismondiPHoriotJC. A glossary for reporting complications of treatment in gynaecological cancers. Radiother Oncol1993; 26: 195–202
RoeskeJCMundtAJHalpernH. Late rectal sequelae following definitive radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1997; 37: 351–358
10.
TakeshiKKatsuyukiKYoshiakiT. Definitive radiotherapy combined with high dose rate brachytherapy for stage III carcinoma of the uterine cervix: retrospective analysis of prognostic factors concerning patient characteristics and treatment parameters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1998; 41: 319–327
11.
LancianoRMMartzKMontanaGSHanksGE. Influence of age, prior abdominal surgery, fraction size, and dose on complications after radiation therapy for SCC of the uterine cervix. A patterns of care study. Cancer1992; 69: 2124–2130
12.
CoiaLWonMLancianoRM. Patterns of care outcome study for cancer of the uterine cervix. Results of the second national practice survey. Cancer1990; 66: 2451–2456
13.
LambinPKormasAHaie-MederC. Tumour size in carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Oncologica1998; 37: 729–734
14.
KappKSStuecklschweigerGFKappDS. Carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of the complications after primary external beam irradiation and Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol1997; 42: 143–153
15.
Ter HarmselBVan MuydenRSmedtsF. The significance of cell type and tumour growth markers in the prognosis of unscreened cervical cancer patients. Int J Gynaecol Cancer1998; 8: 336–344
16.
PourquierHDelardRAchilleE. A quantified approach to the analysis and prevention of urinary complications in the radiotherapeutic treatment of cancer of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1987; 13: 1025–1033
17.
OrtonCGWolf-RoseblumS. Dose dependance of cervix complication rates in cervix cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1986; 12: 37–44
18.
PerezCAFoxSLockettMA. Impact of dose in outcome of radiation alone in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: analysis of 2 different methods. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1991; 21: 885–898
19.
EifelPJThornsWWSmithTLMorrisMOswaldMJ. The relationship between brachytherapy dose and outcome in patients with bulky endocervical tumours treated with radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1994; 28: 113–118
20.
UnoTItamiJArugaM. High dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: risk factors for late rectal complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1998; 40: 615–621
21.
CornBWHanlonALPajakTFOwenJHanksGE. Technically accurate intracavitary insertions improve pelvic control and survival among patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynaecol Oncol1994; 53: 294–300
22.
OrtonCG. High and low dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma. Acta Oncologica1998; 37: 117–125
23.
RodrigusPDe WinterKVenselaarJLMLeersWH. Evaluation of late morbidity in patients with carcinoma of the cervix following a dose rate change. Radiother Oncol1997; 42: 137–141
24.
LeborgneFFowlerJFLeborgneJHZubizarettaEChapellR. Fractionation in medium dose rate brachytherapy of cancer of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1996; 35: 907–914
25.
PerezCABreauxSBedwinekJM. Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Analysis of complications. Cancer1984; 54: 235–246
26.
WangCJLeungSWChenHC. High dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical carcinoma: 5 year results and implication of increased low-grade rectal complication on initiation of an HDR-IC fractionation scheme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1997; 38: 391–398
27.
ClarkBGSouhamiLRomanTN. The prediction of late rectal complications in patients treated with high dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1997; 38: 989–993
28.
RakovitchEFylesAWPintilicMLeungPMK. Role of mitomycin C in the development of late bowel toxicity following chemoradiation for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1997; 38: 979–987
29.
PhillipsTLFuKK. Quantification of combined radiation and chemotherapy effects on critical normal tissues. Cancer1976; 37: 1186–1200
30.
EifelPJLevenbackCTaylor WhartonJOswaldMJ. Time course and incidence of late complications in patients treated with radiation therapy for FIGO stage IB carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1995; 32: 1289–1300
31.
DenhamJWO'BrienPCDunstanH. Is there more than one late radiation proctitis syndrome?Radiother Oncol1999; 51: 43–53
32.
WangCJLeungSWChenHC. The correlation of acute toxicity and late rectal injury in radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma: evidence suggestive of a consequential late effect. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1998; 40: 85–91
33.
DentOFGaitEChapuisPH. Quality of life in patients undergoing treatment for chronic radiation induced rectal bleeding. Br J Surgery1998; 85: 1251–1254
34.
StewartFA. Mechanism of bladder treatment and repair after treatment with radiation and cytostatic drugs. Br J Cancer1986; 53: 280–291
35.
Watkins BrunerDLancianoRKeeganM. Vaginal stenosis and sexual function following intracavitary radiation for the treatment of cervical and endometrial carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1993; 27: 825–830
36.
AbitolMMDavenportJH. Sexual dysfunction after therapy for cervical carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynaecol1974; 119: 181–189