Two research projects were carried out to investigate the effects of improved street lighting on crime in Dudley and Stoke-on-Trent. In Dudley, crimes decreased by 41% in the experimental area, compared with a 15% decrease in a control area. In Stoke, crimes decreased by 43% in the experimental area and by 45% in two adjacent areas, compared with a decrease of only 2% in two control areas. In the two projects, the financial savings (from reduced crimes) exceeded the financial costs by between 2.4 and 10 times after one year. It is concluded that improved street lighting can be extremely cost-effective.
References
1.
Painter KA, Farrington DP.Improved street lighting: crime reducing effects and cost-benefit analyses. Security Journal1999; 12: 17-32.
2.
Brand S, Price R.The economic and social costs of crime. London: Home Office, 2000.
3.
Welsh BC, Farrington DP.Monetary costs and benefits of crime prevention programmes. In Tonry M ed. Crime and justice, Volume 27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000: 305-361.
4.
Painter KA, Farrington DP.The crime reducing effect of improved street lighting: the Dudley project. In Clarke RV ed. Situational crime prevention: successful case studies, second edition. Guilderland, NY: Harrow & Heston, 1997: 209-226.
5.
Painter KA, Farrington DP.Street lighting and crime: diffusion of benefits in the Stoke-on-Trent project. In Painter KA, & Tilley N eds. Surveillance of public space: CCTV, street lighting and crime prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 1999: 77-122.
6.
Home Office. Criminal Statistics, England and Wales 1993. London: HMSO, 1994.
7.
Miller TR, Cohen MA, Wiersema B.Victim costs and consequences: a new look. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice, 1996.
8.
Mirrlees-Black C, Mayhew P, Percy A.The 1996 British Crime Survey. London: Home Office Statistical Bulletin, 24 September 1996.
9.
Safe Neighbourhoods Unit. Crime prevention on council estates. London: HMSO, 1993: 145-145.
10.
HM Treasury. Appraisal and evaluation in central government. London: The Stationery Office, 1997: 24-24.
